1 / 22

Nanorobotics

Nanorobotics. Motivation, Potential and Challenges Kyle Swenson. Introduction. Definition of nanorobotics History and origin of nanorobotics Current status of small robotics Methods to build nanoscale components Technical challenges in building nanoscale components Applications

jenna
Télécharger la présentation

Nanorobotics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nanorobotics Motivation, Potential and Challenges Kyle Swenson

  2. Introduction • Definition of nanorobotics • History and origin of nanorobotics • Current status of small robotics • Methods to build nanoscale components • Technical challenges in building nanoscale components • Applications • Ethical concerns

  3. Nanorobotics • Two definitions • An automated or semi-automated device used in the construction of nanorobots • An active structure at the nanoscale (1 nm to 1 µm) that has movement, sensing, signaling, information processing, or swarm behavior capabilities.

  4. History and Origin of Nanorobotics • Richard Feynman • 1959 lecture “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” • Manipulating matter at the atomic scale • “Swallowing the doctor.” • Improvements in microscopy • Optical microscopes give about 200 nm of resolution • Scanning electron microscopes give about 1 nm of resolution • Scanning probe microscopy (circa 1980) • 0.01 nm to 0.1 nm of resolution

  5. First Nanomanipulation • In 1990s, D.M. Eigler and E.K. Schweizer at IBM • Positioned single atoms with a scanning tunneling microscope • First realization of nanomanipulation • Used an ultra high vacuum (UHV) at about 4 °K http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/07/IBM_in_atoms.gif

  6. Current Status of Small Robotics: Microrobotics • Microrobotics • An active structure at the microscale (1 µm to 1 mm) that has movement, sensing, signaling, information processing, or swarm behavior capabilities. • Uses micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) • Examples • Intelligent Small-World Autonomous Robots for Micro-manipulation (I-SWARM) • NanoHand • ETH Microrobot • ETH Swimming Microrobot

  7. I-SWARM • Purpose: Investigate robot swarming technology • 3 legs that are piezoelectrically actuated • Weighs 65 mg, volume of 23 mm3 • Solar cells for power (2.5 mW) • Flexible PCB with: • IR communication module • Capacitors • ASIC • Locomotion module

  8. I-SWARM: Diagram • Solar panel • IR communications module • ASIC • Capacitors • Piezoelectric module

  9. NanoHand • Microgripper designed to grab and accurately place a signal carbon nanotube • Electrothermal principles • Can pick up and place objects from about 100 nm to about 20 nm • Easy to pick up objects, difficult to drop them • Intermolecular forces are much stronger than gravity at this scale. • “Glue” the CNT in place using electron beam-induced deposition

  10. ETH Microrobot • Magnetic approach to moving microrobots • Can only move along an engineered substrate, limiting it’s usability • The microrobot aligns itself depending on the orientation of the magnetic field • A changing magnetic field causes the gap to narrow, and the spring gets compressed • This force creates a frictional difference and the microrobot moves

  11. ETH Swimming Microrobot • Based off flagellum • Some bacteria (E. Coli) use flagella for propulsion • In the presence of a small rotating magnetic field (1 – 2 mT) they can “swim” through water • 20 um/sec • About 25 to 60 um long • Body: indium, gallium, arsenic and chromium • Head: chrome, nickel and gold

  12. Current Status of Small Robotics: Nanorobotics • In the research and theoretical phase • Global research effort increased from $432 million in 1997 to $3 billion in 2003 • Expected to exceed $1 trillion in next 10 to 15 years • Two primary research foci • Using macroscale tools to manipulate nanoscale objects • Virtual reality representations of nanoscale objects • Adaptations of CAD tools • Developing and investigating nanoscale components • Carbon nanotubes (CNT) • Pharmaceutical drug delivery mechanisms • DNA computation

  13. Building Nanoscale Components • Top down approach • Uses techniques similar to current microchip fabrication • Lithography and etching • Currently make MEMS in this way, potentially NEMS • Bottom up approach: placing individual molecules (manually, self-assemblers, or a growing mechanism) • Synthetic • Biological • Combination

  14. Building Nanoscale Components: Bottom Up Methodology • Synthetic • Carbon nanotubes • Pharmaceutical drug delivery • Biomimetic • Imitating nature (flagella) • Biological • Nubots (Nucleic acid robots) • Uses DNA, RNA, and proteins to build motors, transmission elements, and sensors. • Combination • Generally use bacteria or proteins (e.g. E. Coli) to provide transportation, signaling, or actuation mechanisms for a synthetic nanorobot. • Nanorobot would change conditions in the environment to get the protein/bacteria to do what it needs to do.

  15. Challenges Building Nanoscale Devices • Physical and chemical properties of molecules aren’t completely understood at the nanoscale • Electrostatic, interatomic, and intermolecular forces dominate, gravity is negligible. • The surface area effect • As 3D objects shrink, their volumes decrease by , but their surface areas only decrease by a • This drastically increases the amount of effort it takes to overcome frictional effects. • Motion • Due to the surface area effect, moving is difficult. • Microorganisms don’t swim, they use drag (friction) forces to move

  16. Challenges Building Nanoscale Devices • Power • Can’t use conventional methods • Mimic biology • Use ATP or pH difference to cause motion • Communication • Nanorobotics will need some form of communication if they are to swarm • Potential for acoustic communication • Between 10 MHz and 300 MHz • 100 micron distance • 10 kbits/sec • Interdisciplinary by nature • Require chemists, physicists, molecular biologists, doctors, engineers (electrical, computer, software, biological, chemical) to all work together efficiently

  17. Application Areas for Nanorobotics • Medical • Targeted pharmaceutical drugs • Nanorobots could target specific cells (e.g. cancer) and release their payload (chemotherapy drugs) and drastically reduce side effects while increasing effectiveness • Preventive medicine • Swarms of nanorobots could actively patrol for pathogens in the body • Dentistry • Active cleaning • Decay resistant teeth

  18. Application areas for nanorobotics • Medical • Tissue Regeneration • Researchers at Rice University have used nanoparticles to “wield” chicken meat together • Sensory Regeneration • Sensors • Femtogram scales • Create synthetic biological sensor systems • Surveillance

  19. Ethical concerns • Patents • At what point is the line drawn between invention and nature? • Privacy • Massive amount of personal information could be gained from something we can’t see • Big knowledge gap between manufacturers and users • Potential health issue disclosure • Human enhancement • What is the limit? • Who benefits? • Autonomous nanorobots • Uncontrolled replication

  20. Questions?

  21. Web Sources • http://www.iris.ethz.ch/msrl/research/current/helical_swimmers/images/swimmer_robot.png • http://www.emeraldinsight.com/content_images/fig/0490370401007.png • http://www.emeraldinsight.com/content_images/fig/0490370401006.png • http://www.emeraldinsight.com/content_images/fig/0490370401004.png • http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/hires/2009/iswarm.jpg • http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/news/hires/2009/iswarm4.jpg • http://phys.org/news170678733.html • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There%27s_Plenty_of_Room_at_the_Bottom • http://ida.lib.uidaho.edu:2065/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4264371 • http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2005/056808.pdf • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/07/IBM_in_atoms.gif • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_force_microscopy • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanning_probe_microscopy • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanning_tunneling_microscope • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scanning_electron_microscope • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_nanotechnology • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bionanotechnology • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_Small_World_Autonomous_Robots_for_Micro-manipulation • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectromechanical_systems • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_flying_robot • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microbotics • http://www.inespe.org/schummer.pdf • http://www.capurro.de/nanoethics.html • http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/nanorobot6.htm • http://www.nanobot.info/ • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_scale_electronics • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biocomputers • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_computing • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_Genes • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanomedicine • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanorobotics • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanotechnology • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biorobot

  22. Other Sources Bogue, Robert. “Microrobots and Nanorobots: A Review of Recent Developments.” Okehampton, UK. 2010 Kroeker, KrikL. “Medical Nanobots.” Sept 2009 Patel, G. M. “Nanorobot: A Versatile Tool in Nanomedicine.” Jan 2006. Verma, Santosh and Chauhan, Rashi. “Nanorobotics in Denitsry- A Review.” 2013. Hogg, Tad and Freitas, Robert A. Jr. “Acoustic communication for medical nanobots.” 2012

More Related