70 likes | 193 Vues
Explore innovative methods for improving student work in design through structured critiques and peer feedback. This guide emphasizes kindness, specificity, and helpfulness in evaluations while fostering a supportive creative community. It includes links to critique protocols, gallery discussions, and video resources demonstrating effective critique practices. Students are encouraged to articulate their goals and engage in collaborative discussions, focusing on improvement and learning. The process includes multiple drafts, peer assessments, and discussions that highlight both strengths and areas for growth in student projects.
E N D
Getting to Excellent Student Work New Technology School of Design
Quality work means… Rethinking Reworking Polishing
Critique Student work with Protocols • Be kind • Be specific • Be helpful http://digitalartandmedia.org/assets/critique-peer-edit-sheet.docx
Gallery Critique • Beginners Gallery Critique • Student work is posted • Students find what impresses them and discuss why • Positive pressure to produce • http://www.hightechhigh.org/projects/?name=HTH%20Structures:%20Critique&uid=62b71eda34c5facd43a5dbe4cfed90a2 • Marisol Franco: Part I, II, III • Dr. Ron Berger http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1znB1ox0_EI • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2K75WO7a70
Follow clear and specific guidelines • Begin with the author explaining the goals and ideas behind the work as well as what they are trying to achieve • Critique the work, not the person • Begin with positives, “I like…” • Use I statements. “I am confused by…” • Use question format when possible
In depth critique • Student assignment is one requiring at least 3 drafts • All students look at the work of one student or one group selected by you • The work selected is either of good quality or poor quality • Demonstrates what is good work • Demonstrates what to avoid • Discussion, Discussion, Discussion