1 / 9

Group 1 Xiao Gong Charlie Hanson     Nishant Mudgal Venetia Siafaka Jiajing Chen Alex Solomko

Group 1 Xiao Gong Charlie Hanson     Nishant Mudgal Venetia Siafaka Jiajing Chen Alex Solomko. Introduction

jesse
Télécharger la présentation

Group 1 Xiao Gong Charlie Hanson     Nishant Mudgal Venetia Siafaka Jiajing Chen Alex Solomko

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Group 1 Xiao Gong Charlie Hanson     NishantMudgal Venetia Siafaka JiajingChen Alex Solomko

  2. Introduction Manchester Metrolink is an urban light-rail system in Greater Manchester, Englandcentred on Manchester City Centre. It operates services to the towns of Bury, Altrincham and Eccles. Metrolink is operated under a management contract by Stagecoach Group, on behalf of the system’s owner, the GMPTE. Because much of the Metrolink route was formerly main-line railway with platforms about 900 mm above ground level, the new stops in the city centre also have 900 mm-high platforms.

  3. Problems Overcrowding 8am & 5pm Unreliable because of delays Poor health and safety record Inaccurate information system Poor ticketing system Poor maintenance

  4. FMEA • A method of reliability analysis intended to identify failures which have consequences affecting the functioning of a system within the limits of a given application, thus enabling priorities for action to be set. • - Perfect for service system • - Identify, prioritize and evaluate failures • Increase user satisfaction • Improve the quality, reliability and safety of a product/process • Early identification and eliminitation of potential failure modes

  5. Data collection and assumptions Observation Interviews Newspaper articles Personal experience Data Analysis # of accidents # of delays Average delay duration # of DEATHS

  6. Quality Attributes for the • Access -the physical approachability of service location • Information - ability of the service to communicate with the customer • Functionality - the serviceability for purpose of service facilities • Punctuality - speed and timeliness of service delivery • Tidiness – neat and tidy appearance of the tangible components of the service • Security – personal safety of the customer while participating in the service process • Competence - the skill and expertise with which the service is executed

  7. in person payment online payment IT service register academic swipe card 4 5 2 1 3 Determination of Potential Failures(Registration) +5 Delighted • 0 mins wait • Clear Introduction • System functionality • Simplicity of terms • Completely informative • lectures • 10 mins wait • Explanations • Quick responsiveness • Lecturer covering basic • material 0 Satisfied • 20 mins wait • Unclear Introduction • Inconvenience of system • Poor responsiveness • Complexity and • usefulness of lectures FAILURES Dissatisfied -5 EXPECTATIONS PROCESS OUTCOME Figure 1.Managing Perceptions with Expectations (Source: Johnston and Clark (2001)’s study)

More Related