1 / 25

Encodings

Encodings. Overview. Review of some basic math Error correcting codes Low degree polynomials. H.W. +, ·,0, 1, -a and a -1 are only notations!. Review - Fields. Def (field): A set F with two binary operations + (addition) and · (multiplication) is called a field if.

Télécharger la présentation

Encodings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Encodings

  2. Overview • Review of some basic math • Error correcting codes • Low degree polynomials H.W

  3. +,·,0, 1, -a and a-1 are only notations! Review - Fields Def (field): A set F with two binary operations + (addition) and · (multiplication) is called a field if 6 a,bF, a·bF 7 a,b,cF, (a·b)·c=a·(b·c) 8 a,bF, a·b=b·a 9  1F, aF, a·1=a 10a0F,  a-1F, a·a-1=1 1 a,bF, a+bF 2 a,b,cF, (a+b)+c=a+(b+c) 3 a,bF, a+b=b+a 4  0F, aF, a+0=a 5 aF,  -aF, a+(-a)=0 11 a,b,cF, a·(b+c)=a·b+a·c

  4. Finite Fields Def (finite field):A finite set F with two binary operations + (addition) and · (multiplication) is called a finite field if it is a field. Example:Zpdenotes {0,1,...,p-1}. We define + and · as the addition and multiplication modulo p respectively. One can prove that (Zp,+,·) is a field iff p is prime. Throughout the presentations we’ll usually refer to Zpwhen we’ll mention finite fields.

  5. Strings & Functions (1) • Let  = 0 2 . . . n-1, where i.We can describe the string  asa function  : {0…n-1}  , such that i (i) = i. • Let f be a function f : D  R. Then f can be described as a string in R|D|, spelling f’s value on each point of D.

  6. Strings & Functions - Example For example, let f be afunction f : Z5  Z5, and let  = Z5. 

  7. received message “noise” 1 1101110 Introduction to Error Correcting Codes Motivation: original message 1001110 1001110 communication line We’d like to still be able to reconstruct the original message

  8. Error Correcting Codes Note that :mmR+ is indeed a distance function, because it satisfies: (1) x,ym(x,y)0 and (x,y)=0 iff x=y (2) x,ym(x,y)=(y,x) (3) x,y,zm(x,z)(x,y)+(y,z) Def (encoding): An encodingE is a function E : n  m, where m >> n. Def (code word): A code word w is a member of the image of the encoding E : n  m. Def (-code): An encoding E is an-code if n (E(),E())  1 - , where (x,y) (the Hamming distance), denotes the fraction of entries on which x and y differ.

  9. Example – a simple error correcting code Consider the following code: for every n , let E(,k)=^k (the same word repeated k times, hence m=kn). E(,4)

  10. Example – a simple error correcting code Because every two words n were different on at least one coordinate to begin with, the distance of the code (1-alpha) is:

  11. E  1-=1/n Example – a simple error correcting code D R

  12. Reed-Solomon codes We shall now use polynomials over finite fields to build a better generic code (larger distance between words) Def (univariate polynomial): a polynomial in x over a field F is a function P:FF, which can be written as for some series of coefficientsa0,...,ar-1F. The natural number r is called the degree-bound of the polynomial. Note: A polynomial whose degree-bound is r is of degree at most r-1 !

  13. Reed-Solomon codes Thm : Given x0,y0,...,xr-1,yr-1F there is a single univariate polynomial P and degree-bound r, which satisfies 0kr-1 P(xk)=yk Proof :  Uniqueness: If there are two such polynomials: p1 & p2, then p1-p2 is a polynomial with degree-bound r, which has r roots. This contradicts the fundamental theorem of Algebra!  Existence: We shall build such a polynomial using Lagrange’s formula:

  14. Reed-Solomon codes yt 0 a-b denotes a+(-b) a/b denoted a•(b-1) Let’s check the value of this polynomial in x = xt for some 0  t  r-1: Since the degree-bound of this polynomial is r, we in fact proved the correctness of the formula

  15. Reed-Solomon codes Def (the Reed-Solomon code): Set Fto be the finite field Zp for some prime p, and assume for simplicity that = Fand m = p. Given n, let E()be the string of the function f : F  F that satisfies:f is the unique polynomial of degree-bound n such that f(i) = ifor all 0  i  n-1.

  16. Reed-Solomon codes • E()can be interpolated from any n points. • Hence, for any , E()and E() may agree on at most n – 1 points. • Therefore,Eis an (n – 1) / m– code, that is a code with distance of:

  17. Reed-Solomon codes p = m = 5, n = 2

  18. Strings & Functions (2) • We can describe any string as a function f:Hd  H (H is a finite field, d is a positive integer). • Given a n we’ll achieve that by choosing H=Zq, where q is the smallest prime greater than ||, and d=logqn.

  19. Reed-Muller Codes Def (multivariate polynomial): Let F be a field and let d be some positive integer number. A function p:FdF is a multivariate polynomial if it can be written as for some series of coefficients in the field. h is the degree-bound on each one of the variables. The total-degree of the polynomial is max{ i0+…+id-1 : ai0…id-1 0 }.

  20. Error correcting Codes Home Assignment • We’ve seen that Reed-Solomon codes using polynomials with degree-bound r have distance of: • What is the distance of error correcting codes that use multivariate polynomials (over a finite field F, with degree-bound h in each variable and dimension d)? Next

  21. Low Degree Extension (LDE) Def: (low degree extension): Let  : Hd  H be a string (where H is some finite field). Given a finite field F, which is a superset of H, we define a low degree extension of  to F as a polynomial LDE : Fd  F which satisfies: • LDE agrees with  on Hd(extension). • The degree-bound of LDEis |H| in each variable (low degree).

  22. Low Degree Extension (LDE) Goal: To be able to find the value of an LDE in any point (set of points) of Fd. LDE x LDE(x)

  23. Low Degree Extension (LDE) Straightforward approach: Represent the LDE by its coefficients. Alas, this will require access to |H|d variables,log|F| bits each, each time! the coefficients of the dimension-d, degree-bound- |H|LDE x LDE(x)

  24. Low Degree Extension (LDE) Second approach: Represent the LDE by its values in the points of Fd. Now we only need access to one variable (log|F| bits) each time. But now we encounter anew problem: we cannot be sure the values we are given are consistent, i.e. correspond to a single dimension-d, degree-bound-|H| polynomial. the value of the LDE in every point in Fd x LDE(x)

  25. Consistent Readers In the upcoming lectures we’ll see how to build readers which: • access only a small number of the variables each time. • detect inconsistency with high probability.

More Related