1 / 23

Reverse-Engineering Instruction Encodings

Reverse-Engineering Instruction Encodings. Wilson Hsieh, University of Utah Dawson Engler, Stanford University Godmar Back, University of Utah. What’s the Problem?. Dynamic code generation, JIT compilation Emit instructions quickly Therefore, avoid assembler

yoko
Télécharger la présentation

Reverse-Engineering Instruction Encodings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reverse-EngineeringInstruction Encodings Wilson Hsieh, University of Utah Dawson Engler, Stanford University Godmar Back, University of Utah

  2. What’s the Problem? • Dynamic code generation, JIT compilation • Emit instructions quickly • Therefore, avoid assembler • Need to know how to produce binary instructions • Want to express instructions in assembly “Generate add %l1, %l2, %l1 for SPARC”

  3. assembly instruction binary instruction assembler What Do We Do? • How can I get the following mapping: assembly instruction  binary format • That mapping exists in the assembler already! • So let’s reverse-engineer it out of the assembler.

  4. debugger disassembler encoding description JIT compiler code emitter generator code emitter DERIVE Tool Chain instruction description instruction description DERIVE assembler

  5. Instruction Descriptions /* SPARC fragment */ iregs = ( %g0, %g1, %g2, ..., %i6, %i7 ); and, andcc, andn, ...  &op& r_1:iregs, r_2:iregs, r_dest:iregs | &op& r_1:iregs, imm, r_dest:iregs ; ba, bn, bne, …  &op& &label& | &op&”,a” &label& ;

  6. debugger disassembler encoding description JIT compiler code emitter generator code emitter DERIVE Tool Chain instruction description DERIVE assembler

  7. Encoding Descriptions /* MIPS breakpoint instruction */ { “break”, “&op& imm”, 1, /* operand */ 4, /* bytes */ ... { 0xd, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, }, /* opcode information */ { /* operand information */ { “imm”, /* name */ IMMED, /* an immediate */ IDENT, /* encoded value = input value */ 0, /* lowest value */ 10, /* length */ ... 16, /* bit offset */ I_UNSIGNED, /* unsigned field */ ...}, } }

  8. debugger disassembler encoding description JIT compiler code emitter generator code emitter DERIVE Tool Chain instruction description DERIVE assembler

  9. Code Emitters /* x86 addl instruction */ #define E_addl_rr_1(_code, rf, rt) do {\ register unsigned short _0 = (0xc001\ | ((((rf)) << 11))\ | (((rt)) << 8)));\ *(unsigned short*)((char*) _code) = _0;\ _code = (void *)((char *) _code + 2);\ } while (0) /* emit “addl %ecx, %ebx” in code_buffer */ E_addl_rr_1(code_buffer, REGecx, REGebx);

  10. Instruction Model • Opcode • Registers (names) • Register sets • Cache prefetch hints on MIPS • Address scale on x86 • Immediates (integers) • Not registers • Labels (jump targets) • Absolute jumps • Relative jumps 31 0 O P C ODE ARG 1 ARG 2 ARG 3

  11. Overall Strategy • Solve for one field at a time • Hold other fields fixed and vary the desired field • Use randomization when necessary to find legal values • Anything that is not in a field is the opcode

  12. Intuition Behind DERIVE Assembly instruction Binary encoding and %g7, %g6, %g0; 0x8009 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g1; 0x8209 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g2; 0x8409 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g3; 0x8609 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g4; 0x8809 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g5; 0x8a09 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g6; 0x8c09 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g7; 0x8e09 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o0; 0x9009 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o1; 0x9209 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o2; 0x9409 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o3; 0x9609 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o4; 0x9809 0xc006

  13. DERIVE Structure

  14. Register Solver • Primary assumptions (for purposes of the talk): • Register fields are independent • All register values are legal • Enumerate registers for one field at a time • Hold other fields constant • Solve each field separately • Example: 3 register fields, 5 bits per field • 2^5 * 3 = 32 * 3 = 96 combinations

  15. Intuition Behind DERIVE Assembly instruction Binary encoding and %g7, %g6, %g0; 0x8009 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g1; 0x8209 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g2; 0x8409 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g3; 0x8609 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g4; 0x8809 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g5; 0x8a09 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g6; 0x8c09 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %g7; 0x8e09 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o0; 0x9009 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o1; 0x9209 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o2; 0x9409 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o3; 0x9609 0xc006 and %g7, %g6, %o4; 0x9809 0xc006

  16. Immediate Solver • Primary assumptions: • Immediate field is a single range of bits in instruction • Explore each bit size to find encoding of one field • Values of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, ... • Again, hold other fields constant • Example: 10-bit immediate field • 10 combinations

  17. Jump Solver • Primary assumptions: • Label field is a single range of bits • Emit jumps to different offsets • Find where label goes for encoding of “0” • Find smallest jump size • Find high bit by emitting a negative-valued jump

  18. Solving Time

  19. Instruction Emitter Generator • Reads in DERIVE-generated specifications • Produces C macros • Can generate runtime checks • Debugging support • Handles multiple instruction encodings • “Linkage” macros for backpatching • Used to retarget Kaffe (publicly available JVM) on x86 • Reduced backend description from 20841267 lines (40%)

  20. Extensions • Can handle instructions that take a subset of registers • SPARC double-word loads • Special encodings that are register-dependent • %eax on x86 • Can handle simple transformations • Low bits dropped off of jump offsets • User can specify transformations • Address scaling on x86 • User can specify registers that are dependent • PowerPC post-increment instructions

  21. Future Work • Extending DERIVE • Fields that are broken up into multiple bit ranges • Memoization of computations • ATOM-like tools • Reverse-engineering linkers

  22. Related Work • Instruction encoding munging • NJ Toolkit [Ramsey & Fernández, USENIX 1995] • Testing assemblers • NJ Toolkit [Fernández and Ramsey, ICSE 1997] • Reverse engineering compiler technology • Retarget back-end generators [Collberg, PLDI 1997]

  23. Summary • DERIVE is a cool hack, but it isn’t just a hack. • It is a useful tool. • It is a good proof of concept. • We did some clever tricks to build it. • http://www.cs.utah.edu/~wilson/derive.tar.gz

More Related