1 / 23

HUNGARIAN BORDER GUARDS

2004.05.01. HUNGARIAN BORDER GUARDS. INTEGRITY. EFFICIENCY. PROFESSIONALISM. 2005. „No wind is favourable for the one who does not know which port to reach.” /Seneca/. INTERNATIONAL ROUTES OF ILLEGAL MIGRATION.

jlemos
Télécharger la présentation

HUNGARIAN BORDER GUARDS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2004.05.01 HUNGARIAN BORDER GUARDS INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY PROFESSIONALISM 2005

  2. „No wind is favourable for the one who does not know which port to reach.” /Seneca/

  3. INTERNATIONAL ROUTES OF ILLEGAL MIGRATION

  4. Changes in the Organisation of the Border Guard and Recent Shifts in Migration Phenomena after EU Accession

  5. 8 9 7 1 10 2 3 6 5 4 TERRITORIAL ORGANISATION OF THE B.G. 2003 16.06.2004

  6. Statistics on application of refusal of entry in Hungary (2004) Visszautasítási őrizet végrehajtása igazgatósági bontásban Szlovákia Ukrajna The number of applying (as a preventive measure) refusal of entry has risen: 24.572 in 2004 4.169 persons Miskolc Ausztria Balassagyarmat Nyírbátor • Main reasons for applying refusal of entry: • prohibition of entry and stay (28%) • absence of a valid passport (15%) • falsification of official records (5%) • absence of a visa valid for Hungary (45%) • absence of a visa valid for travelling on from HU(3%) Győr Budapest Románia Szombathely 5.906 persons JELMAGYARÁZAT Szlovénia Nagykanizsa Orosháza Határőr Igazgatóság 3.569 persons 1.060 persons Kiskunhalas 6. Pécs Szerbia-Montenegró Horvátország

  7. Illegal Crossing of the Border and its Attempt at our External and Internal Borders Internal 50 % External 50 % 2003.01.01. -2003.12.31. Internal 67 % External 33 %

  8. Illegal Crossing of the Border and its Attempt at our External and Internal Borders(2004) 2004. External border 16 % 84 % Internal border

  9. Changes in the Measures against Illegal Migration Infringements of the law are mostly detected at the border crossing points. (green border: 23 %; border crossing points : 55%; within the country: 22 %)

  10. ORGANIZATIONS DEALING WITH MIGRATION IN HUNGARY POLICE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY (OIN) BORDER GUARDS NATIONAL INSPECTORATE OF LABOUR AND LABOUR SAFETY CUSTOMS AND FINANCE GUARD 34.

  11. Border Control System of Hungary Patrolling on the territory of 8-20 km Cooperation of the executive units along the external borders Coordination among the services, common patrolling along the internal borders of Austria, Slovenia,Slovakia Operating the illegal migration net, Border Guards, Police, Custom and Finance Service Immigration and Naturalization Office, National Inspectorate of Labour and Labour Safety Countrywide activity of Criminal Investigation and Intelligence Service; Alien Policing and Petty Offence.

  12. Falsification of Official Records:3.181 cases in 2004 • Permesso di Soggiorno, • Slovakian IDs, • falsified Lithuanian passport and travel documents of EU Member states

  13. People Smuggling 660 persons in 2004

  14. Smuggling of Tobacco Products • 2003: 117 million HUF- 460.000 € • 2004: 175 million HUF- 700.000 €

  15. Asylum seekers in Hungary

  16. Main Factors Affecting Border Safety GLOBAL FACTORS • migratory movements •organised crime features being part of the migration phenomenon • fight against terrorism REGIONAL FACTORS • preparations of new EU MSs for Schengen accession • process of integration of the Balkans : • Widening international co-operation • establishment of the External Borders Agency (May 2005)  further EU enlargement (2007: Romania, Bulgaria)  Croatia  Turkey  Western Balkans •situation of Ukraine and Moldova affecting border security INTERNAL FACTORS • difficulties arising from the abolition of internal borders • very limited financial possibilities • possible use ofEU funds • need for strategic partnership (Police, OIN, Customs and Finance Guard, MFA) •reforms of public administration •modifications of relevant acts (Constitution, Act on BG, Aliens Act, Act on Asylum) • citizens’ claims for further abolition of internal borders, and making external border crossing easier

  17. XII. 50 countries and 18 organizations participated in 2004 XII. International Border Police Conference Siófok, May 09-12th 2004

  18. T r a i n i n g • Implementation of a common project with our Spanish partners aiming at the updating of the training system of the Turkish Border Guards -- from January 1st 2006 onwards • Submitting a project proposal to participate in a twinning programme aiming at facilitating thepreparations for Schengen accession of the Romanian Border Police (assessment of applications is underway)

  19. Why is the Söderköping Process Important for Hungary? Hungary situated at the gates of Ukraine and the Balkans plays an important role in the border security system of the EU. • We have to possess broad range of information on the authorities participating in migration management in the new EU MSs and those of our neighbouring countries situated at the EU’s external border (organisational structure, legislation on their operation); • Up-to-date information on illegal migration channels, as well as on current changes in the migration phenomenon can be obtained; • Provides a useful forum for exchange of views helping to better understand possible ways for action; • Gives excellent opportunities to establish personal contacts supporting exchange of experiences.

  20. Why is the composition of participating states of the Söderköping Process very appropriate? • Same area, same challanges in the field ofthe fight against illegal migration, • Opportunity to disseminate experiences of the establishment of organisations in conformity with EU standards, • Pooling expertise, • Creation of professional relations of experts, strengthening good neighbourhood practice.

  21. HATÁRŐRSÉG 2004.05.01 "No wind is favourable for the one who does not know which part to reach" (Seneca) EU Schengen 2007

  22. HATÁRŐRSÉG 2004.05.01 Thank You for Your Attention

More Related