ECOMM 2017 Maastricht, 2nd June 2017

1. SUMP in Czech cities: a compromise or a winning strategy? Hana Brůhová Foltýnová Radomíra Jordová ECOMM 2017 Maastricht, 2nd June 2017

2. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 Trends in passenger transport Accelerated demand for transport since 1990 in CZ • ↑ share of cars • ↓ share of public transport • ↓ share of rail passenger transport • High external costs of (passenger) transport in CZ • Dealing with societal changes Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová, bruhova@koltech.cz, +420 736 434 347

3. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 SUMP – situation in CZ • new approach in CZ • cities over 40 thous. inhab. must have a SUMP when applying for EU Operational Funding since 2021 • temporarily, cities can prepare a „SUMF“ by 2020 SUMF = Sustainable Urban Mobility Framework, defined by the Czech Ministry of Transport, based on public transport master plans with some principles of SUMPs Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová, bruhova@koltech.cz, +420 736 434 347

4. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 SUMP – situation in CZ no experience with SUMPs no funding for SUMPs preparation available missing trust and understanding to this concept existing national SUMP guidelines (since Dec. 2015) well-established groups and platforms supporting cities Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová, bruhova@koltech.cz, +420 736 434 347

5. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 State of the art of SUMP implementation

6. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 State-of-the-art in CZ Relatively well developed • Actions towards support of PT and use of smart technologies • Planning of cycling infrastructure Needs more focus and support • Stakeholders involvement and full participatory approach during the whole planning and implementation process • Mobility management and its measures • Promotion of sustainable transport modes, campaigns • Better monitoring and evaluation of the already implemented policies, transport behaviour surveys, data collection Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová, bruhova@koltech.cz, +420 736 434 347

7. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 Barriers of SUMPs implementation • Communication among relevant departments at city halls (no mobility manager) as well as with other stakeholders • Local elections and personal changes at city halls • Missing legislation for complex ´urban mobility´ issues • Making visions and involvement and coordination of key stakeholders • No or a lack of finances allocated to SUMPs preparation and implementation Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová, bruhova@koltech.cz, +420 736 434 347

8. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 Main challenges of SUMPs implementation • Often only a strategy on paper – to fulfil the requirement to get funding for transportation projects • Low ambition • Missing political will to regulate car traffic • Missing political will for innovative measures

9. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 Good practice in Czech SUMPs • Zlín • Transformation of the general traffic plan to SUMP • Litoměřice • preparation study for SUMP • pilot SUMP for a small city (24 thous inhabitants) • experts driven • Brno • separate tenders on SUMP preparation and communication • activation of NGOs and the non-governmental sector • Parallel communication channels and public involvement • Visions of mobility defined by several experts and discussed on an expert workshop to find a consensus Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová, bruhova@koltech.cz, +420 736 434 347

10. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 Firstwinners? Brno: 2010 2016

11. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 Firstwinners? Prague: 2008 2016

12. ECOMM 2017, Maastricht, June2, 2017 Factors of success • Strong political support • Local leader • Existence of guidelines • Institution guaranteeing SUMP quality • Financial sources • General awareness and ability to gain support of stakeholders Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová, bruhova@koltech.cz, +420 736 434 347

13. Thank you for your attention! Contact: Hana Brůhová-Foltýnová Kolin Institute of Technology prev. Transport Research Centre bruhova@koltech.cz Radomíra Jodrová Transport Research Centre radomira.jodrova@cdv.cz