1 / 17

Projective Personality Tests

Projective Personality Tests. Projective Personality Tests. Based on PROJECTIVE HYPOTHESIS: when people attempt to understand an ambiguous or vague stimulus their interpretation of that stimulus relfect their needs, feelings, experiences, prior conditioning, thought processes

joann
Télécharger la présentation

Projective Personality Tests

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Projective Personality Tests

  2. Projective Personality Tests • Based on PROJECTIVE HYPOTHESIS: • when people attempt to understand an ambiguous or vague stimulus their interpretation of that stimulus relfect their needs, feelings, experiences, prior conditioning, thought processes • Ambiguous stimuli that have been used include: • Ink blots (Rorschach) • Ambiguous pictures (Thematic Apperception Test) • Sentence stems

  3. Popularity of Projective Tests

  4. The Rorschach Inkblot Test • use of inkblots to assess personality functioning proposed by Binet in 1916 • Rorschach was first person to use them to identify psychological disorders • began his inverstigations around 1911 • “Psychodiagnostik” 1921 • died in 1922 at age of 36

  5. History of the Test • initially unenthusiastic response to book • David Levy brought test to US from Europe • his student, Samuel J. Beck, wrote a no. of books about the test, & helped popularize it until his death in 1980 • others who popularized it were Marguerite Hertz, Bruno Klopfer, Zygmunt Piotrowski & David Rapaport • became extremely popular • WLU library holds about 20 books on Rorschach • there is an annual international conference just on the Rorschach

  6. Test Stimuli • inkblots formed by dropping ink on piece of paper & folding it • Rorschach selected 10 from thousands of inkblots he experimented with: • five black & gray; • 2 black, grey & red; • 3 different colours

  7. Administration of Test • examiner hands card to subjects & asks “what might this be” • examiner keeps a verbatim record of responses to each card, reaction time & duration of responses, position in which cards are held, spontaneous remarks, emotional expressions • each card administered twice • free association • inquiry • during inquiry, tester attempts to ascertain what in the inkblot made person see what he/she saw

  8. What might this be?

  9. Scoring

  10. Scoring Systems • Content analysis • Exner’s scoring system

  11. Reliability & Validity • Reliability using Exner’s scoring system is reasonably high (.61 to .74), but many do not consider this to be adequate • Poor as a diagnostic tool: no relationship with • psychopathology • conduct disorder • antisocial personality • depression • PTSD • anxiety disorder • antisocial personality etc., etc., etc.

  12. The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) • introduced by Christiana Morgan & Henry Murray in 1935 as a method to explore unconscious thoughts and fantasies • based on Murray’s theory of needs • test material administered to any one subject consists of 10 or 12 cards, chosen from 31 available (1 of these being blank)

  13. Administration Procedure • “I am going to show you some pictures. I want you to tell me a story about each picture. Tell me what led up to the story, what is happening, what the characters are thinking and feeling, and what the outcome will be”

  14. Scoring • HERO: • character with whom subject seems to have identified • traits of hero: superiority, intelligence, loneliness • NEEDS of the hero: • using Murray’s formulation – includes achievement, agression, nurturance • scored on an intensity scale from one to five • PRESS (environmental forces that interfere with or facilitate satisfaction of various needs) • e.g., aggression, in which hero’s property or possessions are destroyed; dominance, where hero is exposed to commands; rejection, where hero is rejected, ignored

  15. Scoring (continued) • OUTCOMES • amount of hardship, frustration experienced • degree of success, failure • usually inferred from the way in which respondents wind up their stories • THEMES • interplay of the hero’s needs, press, and unsuccessful or successful resolution of conflicts, constitute a theme • they represent need-press combinations • when reviewing totality of response, question is “what issues, conflicts, or dilemmas are of the greatest concern to the respondent?”

  16. Reliability & Validity • mixed results for reliability and validity • better for specific scoring protocols, such as achievement motivation

  17. Other Projective Tests • Blacky Pictures • Rosenzweig Picture Frustration Test • Draw-a-Person Test • Word Association Test • Rotter Incomplete Sentence Blank

More Related