1 / 12

Part 851 & Vacuum Systems

Part 851 & Vacuum Systems. Office of Science Accelerator Safety Workshop. W.R. Casey NSLS-II Project Brookhaven National Laboratory August 12, 2008. Vacuum System Design Issue.

joanna
Télécharger la présentation

Part 851 & Vacuum Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Part 851 & Vacuum Systems Office of Science Accelerator Safety Workshop W.R. Casey NSLS-II Project Brookhaven National Laboratory August 12, 2008

  2. Vacuum System Design Issue Part 851 defines a vacuum system as a pressure system because of the potential for back-pressurization which invokes ASME Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII Discussed at length at SC sponsored Accelerator Safety Workshop held 8/07 Uncertainty was expressed regarding interpretation and implementation of requirement Potential impact to design of NSLS-II and other new accelerators was noted

  3. Approach to Addressing Pressure System Requirements for Vacuum Systems • Developed during break-out session at Accelerator Safety Workshop • ORNL, BNL, ANL, LANL, TJNL, and others • Prevent pressure differential greater than 15 psig through use of pressure relief devices (prevent over-pressurization if accidentally backfilled) • Develop guidance that defines the design, fabrication, inspection, & test requirements for a vacuum vessel.

  4. Approach to Addressing Pressure System Requirements for Vacuum Systems (cont.) • Form a working group to further develop this guidance. • Issue guidance as an Office of Science document, most likely as an attachment to the Implementing Guidance for the DOE Accelerator Safety Order 420.2B.

  5. Status of Effort • Working Group was formed Jan. 2008 • Technical issues were discussed during 6 conference calls from January to April. • Six drafts of consensus standard were reviewed • Final draft issued 6/17/08 • Edited version issued 7/17/2008

  6. Members of Working Group • Argonne National Laboratory • Jeffrey T Collins • William F Toter • Brookhaven National Laboratory • Robert Casey (Chair) • Edwin Haas • Dick Hseuh • Steven Kane • Edward Lessard • Sushil Sharma • Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory • Daniel R Olis • David R Pushka • Oak Ridge National Laboratory • Peter Ladd • Stanford Accelerator Center • R. Keith Jobe

  7. Summary of Standard • Key features of standard • Defines design requirements for all vacuum vessels • Requires ASME code compliance for vacuum vessels subject to over pressurization > 15 psig • Defines requirements for equivalent level of safety when ASME code does not apply (because of pressure range, vessel geometry, use of special materials, etc) • Provides exemption for vacuum vessels with energy less than 100,000 joules or vessels with small dimensions (cross-sectional area less than 28.5 in2)

  8. Summary of Standard (cont.) • Defines • Authority having jurisdiction • Engineering evaluation • Independent design professional • Pressure Safety Committee • Responsible vacuum system design engineer • Vacuum systems • Category I • Category II • Category III

  9. Summary of Standard (cont.) • Defines responsibilities and qualification requirements for the responsible design engineer, independent reviewer, authority having jurisdiction, and Pressure Safety Committee • Establishes requirements for • Design • Design review • Fabrication • Welding • Inspection • Testing • Pressure Relief • Records

  10. Summary of Standard (cont.) • Two Appendices • Appendix A defines “Engineering Evaluations” • Appendix B defines independent review requirements for Category III vacuum vessels

  11. Current Status • The working group is very satisfied with its product – there was a true consensus. • Definitions and requirements are being incorporated into BNL Pressure Safety requirements (other Labs are doing the same) • However – we need for this standard to be recognized by the Office of Science and incorporated into the Accelerator Safety Order (or other appropriate documents)

  12. Next Step • Review standard at break-out session • Incorporate any additions, deletions, modifications to standard • Identify responsibility and process for moving the document into the Office of Science • Establish time line for official recognition of standard

More Related