1 / 11

CASE STUDY – Combined Loading

This case study explores the design and performance of combined drill bit isolators specifically engineered for underground mining applications. These isolators are crafted to handle a thrust load of 8,000 lbs and 300 lb-ft torque, ensuring maximum safety during operation. Results indicate that the integration of bit and chuck isolators yielded a significant 7 dB(A) reduction in sound pressure levels at the operator’s position. Detailed design reviews highlight the critical stress points in metal components, supported by finite element analysis (FEA) and hand calculations to validate performance metrics. ###

job
Télécharger la présentation

CASE STUDY – Combined Loading

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CASE STUDY – Combined Loading • Drill bit isolators for underground mining – all metal components and elastomer must be safe! • Design requirement: 8,000 lb thrust load and 300 lb-ft (3,600 lb-in) torque – these are basically the cutting forces.

  2. Bit Isolator Drill Depth up to 48” Chuck Isolator

  3. Results showed that in combination, the bit isolator and the drill chuck isolator provided a 7 dB(A) reduction in sound pressure level at the operator position. Ref: Noise controls for roof bolting machines, P. Kovalchik, A. Smith, R. Matetic and J. Peterson

  4. FULLY BONDED: 1 3/8”” 1 3/8” Drill Bit Isolator – Design Review: Drill Bit isolator: Chuck isolator: 1 3/8" DBI, R. Michael, PE

  5. Critical Area!! Look at metal components: Where would you expect max stress to occur? 1 3/8" DBI, R. Michael, PE

  6. 1 3/8" DBI, R. Michael, PE

  7. Results: FE Analysis 1 3/8” DBI All cases, thurst load = 8,000 lb, torque = 300 lb-ft (3,600 lb-in) 1 3/8" DBI, R. Michael, PE

  8. Max Principal, s1 Min Principal, s1

  9. Max shear stress, tmax VERIFY FEA RESULTS WITH HAND CALCS!!!!

  10. HAND CALCS: From Axial Load From Torque Principal Stresses: =11.95 +/- 35.8 ksi How do these values compare with FEA results? Next: use Mohr’s circle to resolve

More Related