1 / 15

Contracting Business Unit

Contracting Business Unit. Contracting Organization DoD COR / QAE Policy Service / Supply Contracting CA Contracting. DeCA Contracting Structure. Contracting Authority. Contracting Authority. CBU Update On New DoD COR / QAE Policy.

jock
Télécharger la présentation

Contracting Business Unit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Contracting Business Unit • Contracting Organization • DoD COR / QAE Policy • Service / Supply Contracting • CA Contracting

  2. DeCA Contracting Structure Contracting Authority Contracting Authority

  3. CBU UpdateOn New DoD COR / QAE Policy • More funds are now spent by DoD on Service Contracts than for Supplies, Equipment and Weapon Systems combined. As a result, Congress has now taken a more active role in the oversight of Service Contracts. • The most recent DoD policy impacts our stores directly. This policy requires appointment of a QAE or COR for all Service Contracts, ranging from the contract to pick up Fats & Bones to your CA contracts

  4. DoD COR / QAE Policy QAEs or CORs must: • Be identify in writing, by name, with a copy to the contractor • Be trained prior to contract performance • Most stores have been required to provide names and conduct on-line COR training over the past 6 months • This will continue to be an ongoing effort • QAE/COR duties must be addressed in performance plans

  5. Contracting Division • Provides Contracting for Support Services, Supplies and Revenue Generation • Bruce Piper, Chief, Contracting Division • 804-734-8640 • Melissa Rios, Chief, Support Services Branch • 804-734-8680 • Michael Shaffer, Chief, Revenue, Supply and HQ Support Branch • 804-734-8681 • Emergency phone for non-business hours 804-536-6500

  6. Micro Purchase Threshold • Micro Purchase aka GPC (Government Purchase Card) • General threshold is now $3000 and stores should use their cards up to that limit • 2 Key Exceptions: • Construction/Facility repairs is limited to $2000 • Services are limited to $2500 • Limitations are based on prevailing labor laws (Davis-Bacon, Service Contract Act) • Convenience Checks • May request after exhausting all other remedies

  7. Service Contracts • Average store has 6 - 8 Service Contracts / Purchase Orders • Linen, Laundry, Mats Rental & Cleaning • Door Maintenance • Knives and Blades • Fats and Bones Removal • Pest Control • Alarm System Maintenance • Banking, Armored Car, EBT

  8. Supply Contracts • Several large ongoing Supply contracts to support stores • Paper / Plastic / Produce Bags • Federal Express • Miscellaneous Supplies (currently Bunzl) • Store Décor • Inventories • Individual contracts/orders awarded to support a store’s specific need

  9. Revenue Contracts • Coupons • Scanner Data • Floor Advertising • Recycling • Managed through OPS • Cardboard • Phasing in Plastic • Converting to DeCA contracts

  10. Unauthorized Commitments • What are they? • Contractor performs without contract or GPC authority • How do they happen? • Unauthorized person directs a contractor to perform • GPC order issued without confirming contractor takes GPC • Resolution • Long and painful, individual could be personally liable • Region Director must personally sign documents • Subject to disciplinary action (individual and management) • Negative opinion of DeCA in contractor community

  11. Commercial Services Division (AMC) Debbie Wiggins, Division Chief (804) 734-8654 Ginna Thomas, Chief, East Branch (804) 734-8546 March 13, 2008

  12. AMC MISSION • Provide contracting support for 170 CONUS commissaries’ shelf stocking, custodial, and RSHA operations contracts. • “Cradle to Grave” contracting • QAE Training (formal and informal) – next two sessions are scheduled during 05/12 – 05/16/08 @ Langley AFB Commissary • Monthly Processing of all DD 250s • Monthly Review of all QAE Surveillance Packages • Conduct On-Site/Telephonic Meetings • A-76 Contracting Mission 12

  13. AMC CONTRACT REPORTING • Bi-Weekly Report • Lists Significant Issues Relative to Store Support for All Contracting Areas • CA Pre-Award Status Report • Reflects All CA Contract Renewals and Updated Monthly. • CA Contract Admin Report • Reflects Pending Admin Actions for Each Store by Zone/Region and Updated Monthly • Overwrites Report • Reflects Monthly Overwrite Percentages/Store 13

  14. AMC LITIGATION • Travis AFB – HDEC08-05-C-0038 • An appeal was filed with the ASBCA by Pride Industries (PI), the former contractor at the Travis AFB Commissary • The appeal requested relief for deductions which were taken from PI’s May 2006 DD 250 for defective services during the months of Dec 2005 through Mar 2006 • Original proposed deductions totaled $123,238.44 • Deduction amount was reduced to $21,987.19, due to insufficient supporting documentation • A hearing in California took place 08/28 and 08/29/07 • DeCA participants were Elliott Clark (GC), Debbie Wiggins (AMC), Romy DeGuzman (QAE), Paul Schultz (QAE), and Lester Benton (QAE). The SA was listed as a witness, but did not have to testify and the SD would have been called as a witness; however, due to illness, he was not.

  15. AMC LITIGATION • In November 2007, a post-hearing brief was filed with ASBCA • Involved the review of over 650 pages of hearing transcripts • Pointed out discrepancies in testimony of PI participants • Pointed out non-compliance with contract terms • Requested denial of the appeal of PI • ASBCA Decision • Issued December 31, 2007, denying the claim of PI • The PI Project Manager should have accompanied QAE on inspections • It was appropriate for QAEs to wait until PI was complete before starting inspections • Non-receipt of copies of DDOs, does not hinder the contractor’s ability to perform to standard • DeCA was entitled to take deductions

More Related