1 / 26

Promotion & Tenure

Promotion & Tenure. New Faculty Workshop December 7, 2012. Purpose of Workshop. Reduce stress Understand the process Plot-out your strategy. Rationale. Having a great faculty is the key to having a great university We try to develop that great faculty

jock
Télécharger la présentation

Promotion & Tenure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Promotion & Tenure New Faculty Workshop December 7, 2012

  2. Purpose of Workshop • Reduce stress • Understand the process • Plot-out your strategy

  3. Rationale • Having a great faculty is the key to having a great university • We try to develop that great faculty • Retention of faculty through promotion and tenure is the pathway

  4. The Investment • You were hired to be successful. • MTSU has a big investment in you. • Time, money and energy recruiting • Start up funds • Mentoring

  5. P & T Policies • TBR • Policy: 5:02:03:60 (Tenure) • Policy: 5:02:02:20 (Promotion) • MTSU • II:01:05B (Tenure) • II:01:05A (Promotion) • Department • All TBR and MTSU P & T policies are in the Faculty Handbook

  6. Probationary Review • Annual evaluations • Third Year: • Midpoint corrections • Critical juncture • You should know where you stand in all three areas

  7. When Can I Be a Candidate? • To Associate Professor: • At beginning of your 6th year (fulfill five complete years in rank). • To Professor: • After completion of 10 years in combined ranks, 4 years as an associate professor (i.e., at beginning of your 5th year) • Application of past service credit upon being hired

  8. To Associate • Promotion to the rank of Associate Professor is based upon both demonstrated performance and potential • What have you accomplished since being hired?

  9. To Professor • Promotion to the rank of Professor is based upon having achieved professional and scholarly distinction. • Evidence of outstanding teaching, significant scholarship and professional growth, service • What have you accomplished since last promotion? • Concept of identity as a scholar

  10. Threshold Concept Scholarship Service Teaching

  11. Review Process • Spring announcement of upcoming calendar • In the Fall: • Preparation of Candidate Information • Review by Dept., Chair, College, Dean • Review by Vice Provost • Winter-Spring: • Review by Provost • Review by President • Submission to TBR • Approval by TBR

  12. Teaching • Primary variable • Narrative statement by candidate on teaching philosophy • Student evaluations • Optional peer evaluations

  13. Teaching • Exceptional teachers will: • Show command of their subject, • Be creative and imaginative, • Be enthusiastic, • Promote critical thinking, • Stimulate their students to improved performance, • Engage in and use research, and • Be outstanding communicators

  14. Scholarship/Creative Activity • Focused approach to scholarship identity • Continuous growth through time • Trends from local to regional to national and beyond • Articles, Monographs, Paper Presentations, Creative Works, Funded Research • No magic numbers

  15. Service • Continuous service • Departmental, College, University, Professional Organizations

  16. Mentoring • Some departments assign mentors • Seek one out-does not need to be from your department • Consult your Chair and Dean

  17. Promotion Exception Rule • Rarely allowed • Often hinges on exceptional scholarship record • Not been granted recently

  18. Appeals • Related to any alleged error in the review process leading to a negative recommendation • Violation of academic freedom • Violation of TBR or University policies • Violation of EEO • Formation of Appeals Committee

  19. Tenure • To be eligible for tenure, must hold rank position • Five years in rank minimal probationary period • Credit for prior service (max. 3 years) • Stopping tenure clock (1 year) • Consideration of teaching, scholarship, service • Termination of Tenure Policy

  20. Myth 1 • Tenure is a right. I will receive tenure if I do a reasonable job. • Tenure is a long-term commitment for the University. • The University expects better than average performance

  21. Myth 2 • Getting tenure is tough. Most faculty will not receive tenure. • Faculty are hired on the assumption that they will receive tenure. • Approximately 90% of those who come up for tenure and/or promotion receive it. • Some faculty members leave the University before standing for tenure.

  22. Myth 3 • Only research and grant funding count. • Performance in teaching, scholarship, and service all count. • The exact factors and their weights vary by department. • Learn about your department.

  23. Myth 4 • I’ll get tenure/promotion if I have x papers. • Teaching and service count • Quality counts • Level of contribution counts • Other factors contribute to scholarship (e.g., grant funding) • No magic numbers!

  24. Myth 5 • If Professor X got tenure/promotion, I’ll get tenure/promotion. • Cases are judged on their merits relative to standards, not in comparison to others. • You may not know everything about Professor X. • Standards change over time.

  25. Possible Policy Changes • Linking Tenure & Promotion • Required peer teaching evaluation • External analysis of scholarship

  26. Conclusions • Stay focused: craft an identity for yourself • Demonstrate continuous growth • Take to heart annual evaluations • What have you accomplished since being hired or last promotion? • Seek advice • Request peer teaching evaluation • Know the guidelines/policies • Approximately 85% of candidates successful annually for promotion

More Related