1 / 104

Problem Solving Model Preparation for Implementation

Problem Solving Model Preparation for Implementation. Adapted from the NC Department of Public Instruction. Shift Happens. Why change, why now? Legislation is necessitating a change Research has shown that there is a better way. What about Assessments?. RtI advocates two principles:

jorn
Télécharger la présentation

Problem Solving Model Preparation for Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Problem Solving ModelPreparation for Implementation Adapted from the NC Department of Public Instruction

  2. Shift Happens Why change, why now? • Legislation is necessitating a change • Research has shown that there is a better way

  3. What about Assessments? RtI advocates two principles: • Assessments should have a relationship to positive child outcomes, not just predictions of failure • Assessments without this relationship do little to benefit children and waste precious time and resources

  4. What About Traditional Evaluations? • Brief screening measures of IQ can rule out mental retardation • If mental retardation is not suspected, measures of IQ have no role in LD diagnosis with RtI

  5. Assessment In RtI • Focus on achievement, behavior, and the instructional environment • Measurable and changeable • Related to child outcomes • In-depth analysis of performance relative to peers • Intervention aimed at improving rate and level of skill development

  6. Cautions in Assessment • Focusing only on the child can miss important factors • “Instructional casualties” • Not exposed to early literacy skills • Marginally effective general education • Instruction not scientifically validated • Instruction implemented with poor integrity

  7. Core of RtI Assessment • Measures all domains that may affect achievement • Comprehensive assessment includes: Screening of hearing & vision Social Developmental History • In-depth assessments in: • Current academic skills • Instructional environment • Behaviors • Interventions

  8. RtI • Focuses on assessment of instructional principles • Variables assessed and considered for intervention: • Time allocated for instruction • Academic learning time • Pacing of instruction • Number of opportunities to respond • Sequencing of examples and non-examples of skills • etc

  9. RtI • Use assessment to make good teaching decisions • Include a measure of integrity in interventions

  10. RtI • Measurement of intervention effectiveness • Early identification and early intervention • Intervention increase in intensity, guided by databased decision making

  11. So How Do We Do This Differently? Problem-Solving Model!

  12. PSM • Problem-solving involves both a conceptual and applied activity • Activities necessary prior to implementation of RtI: • Training • Local norms

  13. PSM • Model designed to meet the needs of diverse learners within school districts • Attempts to identify and implement best educational strategies to meet the needs of all learners • Requires significant changes in mind set and philosophy

  14. Thinking Outside the Box !

  15. Prerequisites • Changes in mind-set that are necessary for all of those involved • Student problems can be defined (academic and behavioral) • Questions drive assessments • Engage in instruction that addresses learning • Intervention is derived from analysis of baseline data

  16. More About This Magic ! PSM: • Seven step cyclical process • Approach to develop interventions and ensure positive student outcomes, rather than determining failure or deviance (Deno, 1995).

  17. Implementation of a RtI System • All seven cyclical stages occur on four different tiers • Movement through the tiers guided by intensity of services of needed

  18. Problem Solving (PSM) Process 1 Step 1 Define the Problem Develop a behavioral (observable) definition of problem 2 7 Step 7 Analysis of the Intervention Plan make a team decision on the effectiveness of the intervention Step 2 Develop an Assessment Plan Generate a hypothesis and assessment questions related to the problem 6 3 Step 6 Implement the Intervention Plan Provide strategies, materials, and resources: include progress monitoring Step 3 Analysis of the Assessment Plan Create a functional and multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis 5 4 Step 5 Develop an Intervention Plan Base interventions on best practices and research-proven strategies Step 4 Generate a Goal Statement Specific Description of the changes expected in student behavior

  19. Training • Important to have training on at least two components of RtI • Problem-Solving Model (PSM) • Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM)

  20. PSM • Implementation is guided by nine principles of the PSM

  21. PSM • Principle #1 • Should involve seven steps • Develop behavioral definition of the problem • Generate hypothesis and assessment questions related to problem • Functional and multi-dimensional assessment to test hypothesis and respond to questions

  22. PSM • Principle #1 (continued) • Generation of goal statement • Develop and implement intervention • Progress monitoring • Decision-making about effectiveness of intervention

  23. PSM • Principle #2 • Collaborative consultation is the means by which PSM is conducted • Team work • No longer does one “expert” make determinations • Each member of team provides their expertise from their perspective

  24. PSM • Principle #3 • Develop hypothesis as to why the problem is occurring • The hypothesis is tested through assessment questions and baseline data collection • Hypothesis is designed collaboratively

  25. PSM • Principle #4 • Functional assessment procedures are implemented • Assessment is performed relevant to the identified problem, rather than determination of disability • Data is collected to prove or disprove hypothesis, answer assessment questions, and provide basis for interventions • Data serves as baseline, comparison to peers, and progress monitoring

  26. PSM • Principle #5 • Implementation of multi-dimensional assessment procedures – RIOT • Four domains are considered: environment, curriculum, instruction, and learner • Remember problems do not always belong to the learner • Review, Interview, Observe, and Test (RIOT) in all fourdomains if relevant

  27. PSM • Principle #6 • Goals identified that should occur as result of intervention • Performance described in concrete, measurable terms • Period of time for intervention identified • Exit criteria for intervention identified

  28. PSM • Principle #7 • Development of prescriptive interventions • Based on data collected and address changeable variables in the relevant domains • Intervention is direct service, progress monitoring, on-going consultation, technical assistance, and a team effort • Effectiveness of intervention continuously tested and changes made when necessary

  29. PSM • Principle #8 • Progress monitoring • Data collected regularly and frequently • Data graphed and analyzed • Effectiveness of intervention analyzed and changes made when needed

  30. PSM • Principle #9 • Decision making based on progress monitoring data • Responsiveness to Instruction evaluated, based on progress monitoring data relative to goal • Continue intervention, change intervention, new intervention, • Evaluation of program, modify program, exit program

  31. Implementation of a RtI System • First three tiers call for implementation of PSM and CBM in the general education setting • Fourth tier represents determining the need for special education referral – the highest level of service intensity

  32. PSM Procedures • Activities at Tier I • Parent and teacher working together to define the problem • What is it? • When does it occur? • Why is this happening? • Then, analyze baseline data or develop plan for collecting baseline data

  33. PSM Procedures • Activities at Tier I • Based on baseline data develop an intervention plan • Parent and teacher together brainstorm ideas for interventions • Discuss what interventions look like • Look at differentiated instruction • Create a Parent/Teacher Log • Develop progress monitoring plan • Set time table for reconvening to evaluate interventions

  34. PSM Procedures • Activities at Tier I • Implement intervention plan • Evaluate • Use progress monitoring • Determine effectiveness of intervention

  35. Examples of Data at Tier I • STAR reading • Pre-EOG • Running Record • Curriculum based measurements (DIBELS, Aimsweb, for example) • Specific skill growth or performance

  36. PSM Procedures • Activities at Tier II • Steps of cyclical problem-solving model repeat, but more school personnel are involved as needed • Parent • Teacher • Counselor, school psychologist, reading teacher, administrator, social worker, nurse, etc.

  37. PSM Procedures Examples at Tier II Parent, Teacher and Other Teacher/Specialist (other professional in the building) Reading Recovery Title 1 services Informal speech interventions Intervention groups 3 times a week for 30 minutes Computer remediation lab: Orchard, Waterford

  38. PSM Procedures • Activities at Tier III • Steps of cyclical problem-solving model repeat • Team members may vary

  39. PSM Procedures • Formalization of process • Problem-solving model forms are completed • Baseline, goal setting, and progress monitoring data systematically collected and charted • Research based interventions are implemented • Data is provided as evidence for need of intervention

More Related