330 likes | 345 Vues
Explore the benefits of dynamic late merge compared to conventional merge in work zones on rural freeways. Analyze early and late merge approaches, Indiana lane merge data, and operational issues. Research needed for volume thresholds and driver information warrants.
E N D
Dynamic Late Merge Control ConceptForWork ZonesOnRural Freeways
Basic Approaches • Early Merge • Late Merge
Early Merge • Static • Dynamic
Indiana Lane Merge ConventionalMerge
Forced Merges • Indiana: 0.4/hour • Conventional: 20/hour
Capacity • Indiana: 1540 pcph • Conventional: 1460 pcph
Conventional Merge Late Merge
Conventional Merge Late Merge
Conclusions • Early & Late Merge Performed Better Than Conventional Merge • Lower Volumes: Early Merge May Be Safer • Higher Volumes: Late Merge May Be Safer & More Efficient
Research Needed • Volume Thresholds for Transition Between Early & Late Merge • Driver Information Needs • Warrants for Implementation