1 / 14

Program Review Training Workshop

This workshop series aimed to improve program review processes through collaborative training and data analysis across various disciplines, including Humanities, Business Administration, and more. Led by a dedicated team, the sessions focused on aligning program categories with AQIP metrics and fostering departmental engagement. Participants explored best practices in data analysis, stakeholder feedback, and action plan creation. Key milestones guided teams to streamline reviews and enhance academic decision-making, ensuring that each program meets student and community needs effectively.

joy
Télécharger la présentation

Program Review Training Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Program Review Training Workshop August 2012

  2. 2013 Program Reviews Slated • Reading (1-9-13) • Humanities & Literature (1-9-13) • Anthropology (2-8-13) • History (2-8-13) • Business Administration, Marketing & Management (2-8-13) • DMS General (3-6-13) • DMS Vascular (3-6-13) • Education (4-10-13) Dates Due to Karen Marler for Academic Council

  3. Your Experiences with Program Review?

  4. Program Review Revision Team Matt Fall Kristen Buttigieg Nancy Miller Rebekah Woods • Joe Shackelford • Martha Petry • Geri Jacobs • Kristi Laird • Denise Geisman • Dave Fitzgerald • Chris Beacco • Todd Butler • Jeremy Frew

  5. Program Review Improvement Outcomes • Aligning Program Review categories with AQIP (Balanced Scorecard/Stakeholders/Data Analysis of Student Learning, Growth, Program Needs) • Voicing department and discipline curricular and co-curricular needs • Improving processes for program review reading, delivery, feedback, action, and institutional decision-making!

  6. Balanced Scorecard

  7. StudyDatapre-populated by IR/Deans Office/HR/Business Office Program Review Metrics: • Course Success • Awards Conferred • Student Satisfaction • Student Engagement • Graduate Satisfaction • Percent of Seats Filled • HQV Course Participation • ADO Reporting • Enrollment – Billing Contact Hours • Enrollment – Unduplicated Headcount • BCH Taught by FT Faculty • Cost per BCH • Faculty with HLC Min Degree Requirement

  8. Discover, Analyze, Act, Inspire

  9. The Process

  10. Another View of the Academic Program Review Process…

  11. Timelines for disciplines whose reviews are due in January and February 2012 Reconvene: Sept. 18, 2012 2-4 pm JW 201 Receive Data Back, Delve into Data Analysis Oct. 19, 2012 10-Noon JW 201 Touching Base, Q & A August:Program/Discipline Review Training Workshop • Create Discipline Team Leader and Team members • Create Timeline September: Complete Course Reviews • Plug in Data; Analyze Data • Conduct Focus Groups (current students, graduates/employers) • Hold Cross Curricular Focus Groups to assess other discipline needs/concerns October and November: • Design Action Plans • Share Progress Milestone checkpoints with Deans December: • Finalize Review • Present full Review to Executive Dean, Dean, team members and other relevant parties • Checkpoints with Deans January – February: • Present Executive Summary and Action Plans to Academic Council

  12. Timelines for disciplines whose reviews are due in March and April 2013 Reconvene: Sept. 18, 2012 2-4 pm JW 201 Receive Data Back, Delve into Data Analysis Nov. 16, 2012 10-Noon JW 201 Touching Base, Q & A August/September: • Create Program Review Team • Design Specific Discipline timelines September/October: Complete Course Reviews/ Data Analysis October/November: • Conduct Stakeholder Focus Groups: Students, Grads, Employers, Advisory Councils • Meet with Other Disciplines for Co-Curricular needs/concerns December: • Plug in Data • Initial Meeting with Executive Deans—Questions/Concerns/ Milestone Checklist January and February: • Design Action Plans • Complete all aspects of the Program Review March and April • Finalize Review • Present full Review to Executive Dean, Dean, team members and other relevant parties • checkpoints with Deans; D • Present Executive Summary and Action Plans to Academic Council

  13. Your input is invaluable! Guinea Pigs Unite! A Team Approach….

  14. End of Year Celebration!!

More Related