1 / 9

LSST-SNAP complementarity

LSST-SNAP complementarity. Reynald Pain IN2P3/LPNHE Paris, France. LSST vs SNAP (and vice-versa). True: Target Dark Energy (and Dark Matter) as primary science Use wide field imager as (main) instrument Hope to start operating in ~2015 A re competing for (some of) the same money But ….

jprager
Télécharger la présentation

LSST-SNAP complementarity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LSST-SNAP complementarity Reynald Pain IN2P3/LPNHE Paris, France 9/18/2008

  2. LSST vs SNAP (and vice-versa) • True: • Target Dark Energy (and Dark Matter) as primary science • Use wide field imager as (main) instrument • Hope to start operating in ~2015 • Are competing for (some of) the same money • But … 9/18/2008

  3. LSST & SNAP apparatus • Primary mirror : ~2m • Field-of-view : ~ 1 deg2 • 6 filters in the visible : • 320 nm -> 1100 nm • 3 filters in NIR (->1700 nm) • low-z spectrograph • Primary mirror : 8.4 m • Field-of-view : ~ 10 deg2 • 6 filters in the visible : • 320 nm -> 1100 nm 9/18/2008

  4. LSST & SNAP surveys LSST Survey SNAP Survey Area(sq.deg) Depth(AB mag) ngal(arcmin-2) Ngal Deep/SNe 15 30.3 250 107 Wide 4000 27.8 100 108.5 Panoramic 7000-10000 26.7 40-50 109 9/18/2008

  5. SNAP & LSST strategies for Supernovae SNAP: Area : 2x7.5 sq. deg. Cadence : 4 days Imaging and spectroscopy Total nb of SN : ~ 2000 LSST: full sky, twice a week => 250000 SN/yr ! well measured subsample at z<1 Some DE models require SN at z>1 Dust modeling requires IR meas. Need for “nearby” SN (ground) Light curve modeling requires lots of SN 9/18/2008

  6. SNAP & LSST strategies for Weak Lensing SNAP: increase the number of resolved galaxies (spatial resolution) and PSF stability LSST: 200 exposures per sky patch will yield negligible PSF induced shear systematics Cosmic shear signal Stars 9-band photometry (incl NIR) helps for phot-z SNAP and LSST will have very different systematic uncertainties 9/18/2008

  7. LSST and SNAP Rely on the same techniques (SN, WL, BAO, ..) to constraint DE but use a very different instrumental approach DE is a difficult measurement. Improving on current (+ near future) constraints will be extremely difficult and will in fine come tohow well one does on controlling the systematic uncertainties LSST and SNAP are complementarity in particular when dealing with systemactic uncertainties Combined, they will yield improved constraints on Dark Energy 9/18/2008

  8. 9/18/2008

  9. Cosmological parameters (1st year) 68.3, 95.5 and 99.7% CL Green SNLS, Blue SDSS/BAO 2005 WM = 0.271 +/- 0.021 (stat) +/- 0.007 (syst) w = -1.023 +/- 0.090 (stat) +/- 0.054 (syst) 9/18/2008

More Related