1 / 11

Overview

Overview. Collaboration Rich Interfacing Technically feasible Vision Agreed upon Funding?. Users. Groups. WBS. Articles. Org. Articles/PBS. WBS. CATIA. CDS. Indico. PPT. PLM. Documents. Meetings/ Conferences. Project Planning Data. Engineering Documents. Other CAD….

jtai
Télécharger la présentation

Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview • Collaboration • Rich • Interfacing • Technically feasible • Vision • Agreed upon • Funding?

  2. Users Groups WBS Articles Org Articles/PBS WBS CATIA CDS Indico PPT PLM Documents Meetings/ Conferences Project Planning Data Engineering Documents Other CAD… CAD (Original format) CAD (JT Neutral format) CAE… Shared Data Layer E R P MTF D7i Asset Tracking

  3. Users Groups WBS Articles WBS Articles/PBS Org CATIA CDS Indico PPT PLM Documents Meetings/ Conferences Project Planning Data Engineering Documents Other CAD… CAD (Original format) D7i Asset Tracking CAD (Neutral format) CAE… Shared Data Layer E R P Equipment

  4. General Scenarios emerging Scenario 1. Integrate existing tools as-is Scenario 2. SmarTeam + EDMS + integration Scenario 3 TeamCenter + EDMS + integration

  5. Current Coherency: Can I guarantee the design of dependent components won’t evolve? Idea Plan Design Build Install Operate Maintenance : Can I trace defects to the original design? Casual 3D “gaseous phase” Assembly : Can I guarantee all the parts of an assembly will fit together? 2D 2D workflow Traceability : Can I trace the prototype to the design?

  6. Future Defects traced to earliest possible stage Idea Plan Design Build Install Operate Casual 3D “gaseous phase” 3D visualisation of assembly in workflow provides for rapid & early error detection 2D All Items/ Assembly declared even in prototype phase 3D model workflow Assembly Impact analysis 2D plans Invalidates assemblies if dependent components altered

  7. Assembly 2 Assembly 1 Flange

  8. CATIA & SmartTeam Read-any format, but produce one format only ITER, IN2P2, Orsay Same vendor Smaller Budget Weaker 3D viewer Weaker dependency tracking Works if CERN is integrator CATIA & TeamCenter Read-any & support any (via JT) DESY, Fermi, INFN… Multicad viewer Strong dependency tracking Neighbourhood tracking Covers agile functionality Works if CERN integrator or collaborator Big Budget EDMS Scenarios

  9. EDMS / CDS EDMS CDS Talks & Seminars Work in Progress Design Documents Committee Documents Drawings Preprints Books Overlap Proceedings Engineering Data Change Requests Publications Photos Measurements Reports Highly visible to top Management as they tend to be Management Meeting documents…

  10. Costs • Operating • PPT, CDS, EDMS : 0.2 -> 0.5 FTE each for a given project • Integration • 2 FTE for 1 year • Setup • Negligible if same server & config as existing • PDM • DESY “1-2m Euro”, Stark “1m$ -> company 1000 people” • 3 FTE : product, system, webservices • 2 FTE : Training, Support & QA • Licenses : Server + end-user + consulting • Time (DESY , Fermi ~ 2 years) • Consulting (DESY – 2.5 UGS x 6 months for startup)

  11. ILC observations • Design already quite advanced • Major players DESY & Fermi using IDEAS • DESY ILC Teamcenter operational • CERN • 1 year before operational • (DESY 1 yr + half year * 2.5 UGS consulting, Fermi 2 years still not oper and they have x-UGS recruits!)

More Related