1 / 24

A case of inappropriate ICD shock causing cardiac arrest

A case of inappropriate ICD shock causing cardiac arrest. Dr Darragh Moran, Dr Niall Mahon. 2003 ED MMUH 16 year old male Chest discomfort Abnormal ECG Normal coronaries. IVDd of 22mm No LVOT gradient noted Satisfactory TMET Rx betablockade Normal 24 holter

judson
Télécharger la présentation

A case of inappropriate ICD shock causing cardiac arrest

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A case of inappropriate ICD shock causing cardiac arrest Dr Darragh Moran, Dr Niall Mahon

  2. 2003 ED MMUH • 16 year old male • Chest discomfort • Abnormal ECG • Normal coronaries

  3. IVDd of 22mm • No LVOT gradient noted • Satisfactory TMET • Rx betablockade • Normal 24 holter • Episodic left-sided chest discomfort persisted • No family history of SCD

  4. May 2007, aged 20 • ED MMUH – collapse following game of soccer

  5. No arrhythmia seen during inpatient monitoring • TMET – drop in blood pressure at peak exertion

  6. ACC/ESC expert consensus HCM Maron BJ, McKenna WJ, Danielson GK, Kappenberger LJ, Kuhn HJ, Seidman CE, et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1687–713.

  7. 18 days later – ED MMUH • OHCA whilst cycling • Prolonged CPR, external DCCV for VF at scene • GCS 3, intubation and ventilation with inotropic support • GCS 11 day 2, GCS 15 day 4 • Aspiration pnemonia • Post-traumatic amnesia, poor concentration, attention deficit

  8. RV lead repositioning • DFT testing – failed 25J and 35J shocks requiring 200J external rescue shock

  9. Defibrillation testing was repeated 1 week later. No further T wave oversensing was detected during this interrogation. VF was appropriately sensed by the ICD, both a 20J and 25J shock were unsuccesful, with a 30J rescue shock being required to restore sinus rhythm. The patient was discharged home in the days that followed.

  10. 2/12 later, patient returned to hospital as SC array had dislodged whilst swimming

  11. 2 years of uneventful follow-up • 2009 – threatened pocket erosion of device • Deep submuscular repositioning • Device check April 2010, high impedance values, >200J, sensitivity of 0.6mV • Admitted for revision and testing of leads and epicardial patch

  12. 3/7 later patient returned for DFT testing • 1st 35J shock was unsuccessful, 2nd successfully restored SR • Long discussion with patient regarding risks and benefits of further intervention • Discharged home, albeit with unsatisfactory DFT

  13. Few months later… • Pain and swelling around device insertion site • Chronic pocket infection • Device explanted

  14. 7 years of device complications • No ventricular events in that time • High risk of SCD • SC implantable defibrillator offered • AEDs located at workplace and also at the gym patient attends to reduce risk of SCD • No further symptoms/adverse events to date

More Related