1 / 18

Plenary session 3: The EU Urban Agenda and cities’ role in the creation of growth and jobs

Plenary session 3: The EU Urban Agenda and cities’ role in the creation of growth and jobs TOWN in Europe Loris Servillo. ESPON Open Seminar 2014 “Opportunities and threats for territorial cohesion: Blue Growth and Urban Poverty”. Three items Main territorial trends

juliet
Télécharger la présentation

Plenary session 3: The EU Urban Agenda and cities’ role in the creation of growth and jobs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Plenary session 3: The EU Urban Agenda and cities’ role in the creation of growth and jobs TOWN in Europe Loris Servillo ESPON Open Seminar 2014 “Opportunities and threats for territorial cohesion: Blue Growth and Urban Poverty”

  2. Three items • Main territorial trends • Opportunities and challenges • Experiences and examples

  3. Morphological analysis

  4. General picture ~8,350 urban settlements can be classified as SMSTs ~70,000 urban settlements can be classified as Very Small Towns (below the 5.000 inhabitant threshold) SMST: about 27% of EU population Very Small Towns: 19% of EU population

  5. What makes SMSTs different • On average, SMSTs (in database) are different from large cities on a range of measures: • Social (older working population, more pensioners, higher ‘non-foreign’ population) • Economic (greater proportion employment in manufacturing, more self-employment, more likely to be net exporter of labour (dormitory), less diverse in sectoral mix) • Housing issues (more second homes)

  6. Changes in SMSTs during the period 2001-11 are different from the change that are observed in cities over the same period • Demographic (faster growing, net migration rate higher) • Economic (slightly greater rate) • However between group and between country differences: ‘All’ Small towns (N=1339) Small towns in NW Italy Small towns in Slovenia

  7. Net migration by country Migration-enhanced aging? Growing Labour exporters Shrinking

  8. Is ‘town’ as a proper category? Socio-spatial configurations with a specific regional dependency high variety of socio-economic performances

  9. EU Settlement polygons NUTS3 with prevailing settlements

  10. Issues for further thoughts concerning regions predominantly populated in small settlements Prevalence of macro trends • less spatial inertial capacity to bounce them back macro/meso regional dependency - relationship with urban regions? National policies matter?

  11. Preliminaryresults

  12. Economic activity mix and population size in SMSTs

  13. Catalonia Slovenia Czech Republic Flanders

  14. ! Policy message

  15. ! Policy message So what? Do SMSTs across Europe face ‘common problems’? • Diverse? Social and economic problems for SMSTs are only ‘common’ in an abstract sense • In practice the ‘problems’ of towns are mainly framed by their national/regional context (clusters of ‘problem-sets’) What concerns of European policy touch down on SMSTs? • Giving SMSTs a voice in regional debates • Small town does not mean small problem • Tailored measures (place-based approach?) • Supporting alternative visions of the local economy • Collective action within/among small towns • Supporting the definition of micro-regionalism processes • CLLD?

  16. THANK YOU Loris.servillo@asro.kuleuven.be

More Related