1 / 32

Cosmology and Clusters of Galaxies

Cosmology and Clusters of Galaxies. Patrick Koch. Cosmology: - what is cosmology? - principles - Big Bang: theory and tests - structure in the Universe Clusters: - largest bound objects - X-ray observation - a many-purpose tool

june
Télécharger la présentation

Cosmology and Clusters of Galaxies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cosmology andClusters of Galaxies Patrick Koch Cosmology: - what is cosmology? - principles - Big Bang: theory and tests - structure in the Universe Clusters: - largest bound objects - X-ray observation - a many-purpose tool - the SZ effect Summer student lecture, july 17, 2007

  2. What is cosmology? • - scientific study of the large scale properties of the • Universe as a whole • tries to understand origin, evolution and ultimate • fate of the Universe • - Big Bang • scientific discipline: • theory  prediction of phenomena observations • century of high-precision cosmology • large scales and small scales and the links in between • interdisciplinary: combining all kind of physics • (plasma, gravity, particle, solid states, chemistry, biology) • tremendous future investements (satellites...) • ....

  3. The Principles (1) The location principle: - It is unlikely that we occupy a special place in the Universe - Universality: the laws of physics are the same everywhere The cosmological principle: • Homogeneity: on the largest scale the Universe has the • same physical properties everywhere • Isotropy: on the largest scale the Universe looks the same • in any direction

  4. The Principles (2) The anthropic principle: • the Universe is fine-tuned to our existence: • strength of gravity • smoothness of Big Bang • strength of strong nuclear force • finally the earth Why??? - chance - luck -‘theory of everything‘ - ...?

  5. Big Bang: theoretical pillars (1) ...expresses the idea that everything started from something very small: why do we need a Big Bang? Experiment } • expansion of the Universe • abundance of light elements • cosmic microwave background observational tests! framework given by: General Relativity (Einstein equations) + cosmological principle + microphysics (particle physics/thermodynamics) Theory

  6. Big Bang: theoretical pillars (2) ... something about General Relativity: • - generalization of Newton‘s law, special relativity • (covariant formalism) • Space (curvature) linked to matter and energy (all kinds) • → equation of state (pressure – energy relation) • missing: the small one (quantum gravity) Basic matter classification: - radiation: photons, neutrinos (positive pressure) - baryonic matter (=‚ordinary matter‘): composed of protons, neutrons, electrons (no pressure) - dark matter: no direct detection yet, but existent (no pressure) - dark energy: the mysterious one (vaccum property?) (negative pressure) Achievements: - correct gravitational bending of light by sun - Mercury perihel - gravitational wave prediction - prediction of black holes as coordinate singularities - Big Bang for a homogeneous expanding Universe

  7. Big Bang: Intermezzo ...some common misconceptions: • Big Band did not occur at a single point in space as an • explosion (space not yet born!) • there is no center of expansion • (both for finite and infinite Universes) • Universe is all space and time we know, thus no • information about the embedding • what gave rise to the Big Bang is beyond the • Big Bang model • (speculations in Pre-Big-Bang models)

  8. Big Bang tests (1): Universe expansion Hubble, 1929 on the very large scale in time and space: Einstein equations+matter distribution give global dynamics galaxies outside of Milky Way systematically moving away from us: v ~ d (Hubble Law), light from galaxies shifted towards red end Redshift z = (ν‘-ν)/ν Hubble law confirms homogeneous expanding Universe ν‘:emitted freq. ν: observed freq.

  9. Expansion: Intermezzo common misconception: redshift (z) = Doppler shift? NO! • it is not galaxies moving through space, but space is expanding, • carrying the galaxies along • the galaxies themselves are not expanding • (gravitationally bound, isolated system) • cosmological redshift (z) is NOT a Doppler shift • (Doppler shift would put us in the center of expansion, • location principle violated) • - redshift to velocity/distance conversion requires specific model

  10. Big Bang tests (2): light elements • Big Bang theory: • early Universe was very hot, 1s after • Big Bang: 10 billion degrees, filled with • neutrons, protons, electrons, positrons, • photons, neutrinos • in 3 minutes (Universe expands and cools): • T and density right for nuclear fusion: • Big Bang nucleosynthesis: • (=light element formation in early Universe) • n → p + e- , n combine with p to deuterium, • deuterium mostly combines to He, some Li •  about 24% of ordinary matter is He, • produced in Big Bang, also observed! •  abundance depends on ordinary matter in • the early Universe • next step: constrain ordinary matter • → WMAP about 8% of critical density

  11. Light elements: Intermezzo Big Bang produces no heavy elements • elements heavier than Li are all synthesized in stars • (bottleneck in BBN: triple collision of He-4-nuclei, takes • 1000 yr for He – C conversion) • late stage of stellar evolution: massive stars burn • He to carbon, oxygen, silicon, sulfur, iron • elements heavier than iron: outer envelopes of • super-giant stars and in supernovae explosion

  12. Big Bang tests (3): CMB BBN • surfaces of last scattering • = snapshots of the Universe • different opacities: • z ~ 1032: graviton opacity • z ~ 1010: neutrino opacity • z ~ 103: photon opacity: • CMB initial conditions primary fluctuations + time evolution + secondary fluctuations + foreground = today‘s CMB (primary fluctuations: intrinsic temperature change due to compression, Doppler shift, Sachs-Wolf effect)  size, matter content, age, geometry of the Universe tool: linear perturbation of Einstein equations

  13. Big Bang tests (3): ...CMB ΔT ~ 10-4 immense progress: - 30 x better resolution - 45 x higher sensitivity integration: 2 yr WMAP=4500 yr COBE

  14. CMB: Intermezzo ... the story of a Nobel Prize: The well known thing: 1963: Penzias and Wilson: radio emission from Cassiopeia A SN remnant, uniform noise source → NP in 1978 1965: Dicke et al.: explain cosmological significance of measurement The unknown things in theory: 1934: Tolman: TD in expanding Universe (no relic predicted) 1946: Gamov: Hot Big Bang model 1948: Alpher and Herman: Nucleosynthesis in early Universe, predict T ~ 10 K 1949: Alpher and Herman: T ~ 5 K 1964: Doroshkevich and Novikov suggest CMB detectability as test if Gamov’s model 1964: Dicke: search for radiation The unknown things in observations: 1940: Andrew McKellar: interstellar absorption lines from rotationally excited CN molecules, consistent with thermal equilibrium of T ~ 2.3 K (remark in footnote of PhD thesis!) 1941: Walter Adams: similar data 1955: Emile Le Roux: all sky survey at 33cm wavelength: finds isotropic emission from T ~ 3K. 1957: Shmaonov: signal at 3.2cm corresponding to T ~ 4K, independent of direction

  15. Big Bang tests (3): CMB – angular power spectrum • Decomposingpatterns of structuresin spherical harmonics (“Fourier transform” of anisotropy on the sphere) • Rotational invariance (average over m) Angular power spectrum Cl is the variance of structures on scale l, on angular scales DT/T map ΔT ~ 10-4 q

  16. Big Bang tests (3): CMB - fundamental physics geometry, age Acoustic oscillations: Interaction photon/baryon fluid with gravity Baryon density DM density detailed physics worked out in cosmological perturbation theory

  17. In summary: Universe = 95% unknown!

  18. Structure in the Universe - observed structures: from stars to galaxies to cluster to supercluster - Big Bang does NOT explain the existence of structure: structure formation scenario must be built in Big Bang framework SDSS: galaxy survey Idea: - Structure grown from gravitational pull of small fluctuations (where do the fluctuations come from?) - hierarchical formation

  19. Clusters of galaxies • largest bound objects in the universe: hot plasma • virialized, hydrostatic equilibrium • M ~ 1015 MS, T ~ 107-108K, n ~ 10-2 - 10-4cm -3, r ~1-2 Mpc • high luminosity Lbol 1041-1046 ergs/s • observations: X-rays, radio, optical Merger tree major mergers Non-linear processes: different morphologies! Linear perturbation theory Clusters of galaxies: present at least since z ~ 1.5 back in redshift z

  20. Clusters of galaxies:coma diffuse radio (Effelsberg) optical core: turbulences? Merger example: a lot of microphysics! X-ray (Rosat) X-ray (XMM) X-ray (Chandra)

  21. Clusters of galaxies same scale: very different characteristics/emission extension! high energy emission: ~ keV mechanism: thermal bremsstrahlung source: intracluster medium How can it be so hot? → deep grav. potential What is the gravitational potential? stars, galaxies the ‚invisible‘ DM

  22. Clusters of galaxies: DM (1) ... or how do we know about DM? • 1930: Fritz Zwicky discovered that the galaxies in the Coma cluster were moving too fast to remain bound in the cluster according to the Virial Theorem: • Stable galaxies should obey this law: 2K = -U • where K=½mV2 is the Kinetic Energy • U = -aGMm/r is the Potential Energy (a is usually 0.5 - 2, and depends on the mass distribution) • Putting these together, we have M=V2r/aG. • Measure M= Σi mi, r and V2 from observations of the galaxies; then use M and r to calculate Vvirial • Compare Vmeasured to Vvirial • Vmeasured > Vvirial which implies M was too small Evidence for DM  90 % DM • Mass/Luminosity comparison:

  23. Clusters of galaxies: DM (2) ... or how to measure the weight of clusters? Crude diagram of cluster atmosphere ICM in (most) clusters close to gravitational equilibrium: outward gas pressure ≈ inward gravitational pull Hydrostatic Equilibrium Spherical Symmetry Poisson’s Equation luminous matter: temp., density total mass! (including DM) Pressure reaches maximum in cluster core X-ray obs. Outward pressure force balances inward gravity at every location within the cluster • Cluster gas pressure profile: • - Separable problem: • measure gas density profile • measure gas temperature profile • - Need X-ray observations!

  24. Clusters of galaxies: DM (3) X-ray obs. spectrum  temperture Measure T in Each Annulus [millions of light years] Remark Line: Best Fit heavy elements: Hints for stellar nucleosynthesis, Supernovae, galaxy-galaxy interaction Points: Observations brightness  density

  25. Clusters of galaxies: DM (4) ... or how to use clusters as cosmological probes • Recall Primordial nucleosynthesis: • Light elements Deuterium, Helium and Lithium were produced when the universe was minutes old • Observations of the abundances of D, He and Li tightly constrain the mean baryon density WB of the universe: • Consider the universal baryon fraction fU? • ratio of mean baryon density ΩB to mean matter density ΩM • Can we use clusters as testbed for universal baryon fraction? • Galaxy clusters are the largest collapsed structures in the Universe. Next best thing to taking a census of the entire observable universe! • We can measure the fraction of galaxy cluster mass which is baryonic • Cluster baryon fraction fB • three baryon reservoirs: gas fgas, galaxies fgal and possibly even dark baryons fdb

  26. Clusters of galaxies: DM (5) • Measuring the mean matter density parameter WM • Measure cluster baryon fraction fB and calculate WM • Gas constitutes ~20% of the total mass in the most massive clusters • This provides lower limit on cluster baryon fraction, and hard, upper limit on cosmological density parameter ΩM Mohr, Mathiesen & Evrard ApJ 1999 , • Combined with measurements of the galaxy contribution to the cluster mass we get a best estimate of the density parameter

  27. Clusters of Galaxies and the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect (SZE) What is it? • Inverse Compton scattering • (CMB photons – hot cluster e- • Spectral distortion of CMB • Up-scattering of photons • (Rayleigh-Jeans to Wien) • Secondary anisotropy radio signal, very weak ~ 100 mJy Spectral (x) function Scattering process Cluster properties / state  Effect depending on frequencyandcluster!

  28. Clusters of Galaxies and the SZE(2): power of SZE 10' 10' 6' OVRO/BIMA SZE vs. X-ray (insets) • X-ray emission brightness falls off sharply with distance • SZE brightness independent of distance (hν/kTcmb~ const.) • only depends on profile (potential well growth with frequency shift) with z and slight z dependence inTcmb. • can locate very distant clusters, if they exist… X-ray X-ray X-ray (Carlstrom et al.)

  29. Clusters of Galaxies and the SZE(3): science • (1) Cluster Survey via the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect (SZE) • Evolution of number counts of galaxy clusters, N(z)  Dark Energy Equation-of-State, cosmological parameters • scaling relations: SZ(y0) – M(r500), SZ(y0) – Tx, SZ(y0) – Lx, Sν/fν – y0 (SZ only)  information of large-scale structure formation, entropy floor (non-gravitational processes) • Probing high-z universe (z>1) (2) Targeted cluster SZ observations: suitable target at right z • complementary to other SZ observations at lower frequency: e.g. additional data point for spectrum of thermal SZ fit, evolution of CMB temperature with selected clusters in z-range

  30. Clusters of Galaxies and the SZE(4): cluster microphysics multifrequency thermal SZ spectral fit: cluster microphysics • additional AMiBA data point @ 90 GHz: • further constraint on cross-over • frequency • → relativistic e- population, • cluster l.o.s velocity • further constraint on maximum • SZ decrement • → relativistic, non-thermal e- SuZIE 140,210,270 GHz BIMA/OVRO 30 GHz AMiBA 90 GHz → AMiBA science goals: next lecture by Keiichi Umetsu

  31. Clusters of galaxies: what else? • X-ray: the ‚classical‘ way • zoomed-in substructures: a lot of microphysics! • (mergers, relativistic particles, magnetic fields, • turbulences, ....) • X-ray with SZ observations: e.g. Hubble constant • clusters (huge mass!) as gravitational lenses • for background objects • (cosmological parameters, including DE)

  32. Appendix: The Beyond Einstein Program WMAP LIGO Hubble Science and Technology Precursors Chandra GLAST

More Related