1 / 18

Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future

Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future. Objectives To share selected findings based on the SPP/APR and NECTC study To hear state experiences To identify resources and assistance To enable participant discussion. Session Presenters. Kathy Whaley, NECTAC

justinphelps
Télécharger la présentation

Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future Objectives • To share selected findings based on the SPP/APR and NECTC study • To hear state experiences • To identify resources and assistance • To enable participant discussion

  2. Session Presenters • Kathy Whaley, NECTAC • Beth Rous, NECTC • Phyllis Mondak, Section 619, VA • Ron Dughman, MPRRC on behalf of NM • Karen Mikkelsen, NERRC

  3. Indicator C8: Early Childhood Transition Summary of 06-07 APR

  4. C8: Early Childhood Transition • Percent of all children exiting Part C who received timely transition planning to support the child’s transition to preschool and other appropriate community services by their third birthday including: • (A) IFSPs with transition steps and services • (B) Notification to LEA, if child potentially eligible for Part B; and • (C) Transition conference, if child potentially eligible for Part B.

  5. Overall Trends Across Sub indicators • More states report higher rates of compliance in notifying LEAs of potentially eligible children (8B) and documenting transition steps within the IFSP (8A) than for holding transition conferences (8C) • More states report full compliance regarding Notification to LEA (8B)and report substantial compliance. • All states reported data on all sub indicators.

  6. Progress • IFSP Steps (8A) – 30 states made progress (8 maintained 100%) • Notification (8B) – 22 states made progress (8 maintained 100%) • Conference (8C)– 32 states made progress (4 maintained 100%)

  7. Progress attributed to:

  8. Slippage • IFSPs with Transition Steps/Services (N=11) • Notification to LEA (N=13) • Transition Conference (N=17) Reasons given: • Inaccurate or changing data systems/sources • Issues of data entry and reporting • IFSPs needed elements and instructions for documenting transition • Unclear policies • Staff shortages

  9. Themes • Improving data collection, record keeping, data analysis and data sharing • Clarifying policies and aligning the consistency of policies across C and 619 • Improving communication and collaboration across Part C and 619 • Training and TA linked to monitoring and correction of non-compliance. • Collaborative and joint training efforts with Part B, Section 619

  10. Indicator B12: Early Childhood Transition Summary of 06-07 APR

  11. B12: Early Childhood Transition Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3 and who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.

  12. Overall Trends Across Indicator • States show steady progress by national average of reported data (from baseline 72% to FFY 06-07 84%) • Changes to data systems decreased performance for some states but considered more accurate

  13. Progress and Slippage • 37 states reported progress • 11 states reported slippage • 3 states maintained 100%

  14. Progress Attributed To: • Changes in Data Collection Procedures and Systems • Changes in Monitoring Processes and Linkage to Improved Data Capacity • Improved Collaboration with Part C • Clearer Policies and Guidance • Intensive Targeted TA

  15. Slippage Attributed to: • FFY 05-06 Data considered inflated or incomplete for purposes of analysis • Selection of monitoring sites in cycle • Staffing and personnel issues

  16. Themes • Better data! • Better monitoring of compliance requirements • MOUs and improved collaboration with Part C • Clarified policies and guidance • Collaborative training and TA • Inconsistencies across states in policies regarding reasons for delay

  17. Additional Resources National Early Childhood Transition Initiativehttp://www.nectac.org/topics/transition/ectransitionta.aspNational Early Childhood Transition Centerhttp://www.ihdi.uky.edu/nectc/NECTAC Resource Collection on Transition from Part C to Preschoolhttp://www.nectac.org/topics/transition/transition.aspSPP/APR Calendar: Technical Assistance Related to SPP Indicators and Determinationshttp://spp-apr-calendar.rrfcnetwork.org/techassistance.html

More Related