90 likes | 93 Vues
Notrees Presentation – ERCOT Integration workshop Slides for Registration/Integration challenges. Notrees Battery Storage System. 36 MW / 24 MWh output Technology: Advanced lead-acid Dynamic Power Resource OEM Partner – Xtreme Power (XP) 24 Dynamic Power Modules with 1.5 MW / 1.0 MWh rating
E N D
Notrees Presentation – ERCOT Integration workshopSlides for Registration/Integration challenges
Notrees Battery Storage System • 36 MW / 24 MWh output • Technology: Advanced lead-acid Dynamic Power Resource • OEM Partner – Xtreme Power (XP) • 24 Dynamic Power Modules with 1.5 MW / 1.0 MWh rating • Modules housed in ~ 6,000 sq. ft. building • Construction began in October 2011; fully operational Q4 2012 • Potential areas of operation: • Frequency Regulation • Energy Arbitrage • Voltage Support • Wind Firming • Curtailment Mitigation • Other Ancillary Services (Non-Spinning Reserve, Black Start)
Registration of new Storage resource • Year-long registration process • Primary source of revisions/discussion on how to ‘fit’ Storage technology into existing framework for ‘conventional’ resources Ongoing ERCOT/Duke/ XP meetings
Limitations of existing Registration/Integration process Issue 1: Resource Modeling Challenge: x1 Physical Asset, but ERCOT systems see x2 Resources - x1 Gen Resource (GR) and - x1 Load Resource (LR) Outcome: Operating duplication & complexity • Separate GR and LR qualifications • Telemetry allocation to identify 'Gen Resource' mode and 'Load Resource' mode • Complex control system functions to ensure RT consistency between modes • Separate GREDP/Performance obligations • How to avoid 'double-counting' in ERCOT market operations processes • Settlement treatment (addressed via PUC rule implementation)
Limitations of existing Registration/Integration process Issue 2: Standardized Registration & Qualification formats Challenge: Standardized RARF information requirements incompatible with operating frameworks for inverter-based Storage technologies, e.g. • Planning Data • Protection Data • Operating Parameters Outcome: Numerous "errors" and "rejections" throughout registration process • Source of automatic registration delays & much discussion • Provision of system-specific technical information to identify performance characteristics
Limitations of existing Registration/Integration process Issue 3: Alignment of existing operating procedures with alternative operating characteristics Challenge: Existing performance requirements designed around installed capabilities Outcome: Potential to limit capabilities of technology, e.g. • Static requirements on Voltage support, Frequency response limit the range of performance available from new types of resources Issue 4: Unfamiliar Commissioning activities Challenge: Project requirements in advance of Operations unfamiliar territory for System Ops e.g. • 'Cycling' of batteries to maintain battery health during construction/commissioning • Inverter testing requirements Outcome: Developer must ensure that Site activity is 'visible' from early stage
Limitations of existing Registration/Integration process Issue 5: Co-location of different asset classes Challenge: Key role for Storage to support other Resource operations and enhance overall grid management – but compounds registration, testing & modeling challenges presented by existing process… Outcome: Additional layer of complexity for both Storage and co-located resource