1 / 4

Introduction (_) Background well introduced? (_) Problem & purpose clear ? Analysis/Method

Introduction (_) Background well introduced? (_) Problem & purpose clear ? Analysis/Method (_) Appropriate ref. to SOTA? (_) Problem well exposed/analysed? (_) Approach well motivated? (_) “Implementation” well outlined ? Test & evaluation (_) relevance & design

kaden-bradshaw
Télécharger la présentation

Introduction (_) Background well introduced? (_) Problem & purpose clear ? Analysis/Method

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction (_) Background well introduced? (_) Problem & purpose clear? Analysis/Method (_) Appropriate ref. to SOTA? (_) Problem well exposed/analysed? (_) Approach well motivated? (_) “Implementation” well outlined? Test & evaluation (_) relevance & design (_) covering the ambition? Results (_) Results objectively presented? (_) Results comprehensible? (_) Results addressing the problem? Discussion/Conclusion (_) Validity of results considered? (_) Do results allow a conclusion? (_) Conclusion well presented? Overall Rating (_) General Impression (_,_) “Raw” Average Score Abstract Review Form (Date of Review: ___ / ___ – 201___)Title of Abstract: ____________________________________________________________Authors: __________________________________________________________________Reviewer(s): _______________________________________________________________Grading: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Good), 2 (Fair), 1 (Bad) SC Review Forms2

  2. Introduction (_) Background well introduced? (_) Problem & purpose clear? Analysis/Method (_) Appropriate ref. to SOTA? (_) Problem well exposed/analysed? (_) Approach well motivated? (_) “Implementation” well outlined? Test & evaluation (_) relevance & design (_) covering the ambition? Results (_) Results objectively presented? (_) Results comprehensible? (_) Results addressing the problem? Discussion/Conclusion (_) Validity of results considered? (_) Do results allow a conclusion? (_) Conclusion well presented? Overall Rating (_) General Impression (_,_) “Raw” Average Score Abstract Review Form(Date of Review: ___ / ___ – 201___)Title of Abstract: ____________________________________________________________Authors: __________________________________________________________________Reviewer(s): _______________________________________________________________Grading: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Good), 2 (Fair), 1 (Bad) SC Review Forms2

  3. Abstract Review Form (Date of Review: ____ / ____ – 201___ ) Title of Abstract: ____________________________________________________________________Authors: Group _______________________________________________________________ Reviewer(s): Group _______________________________________________________________ Generel comments: _________________________________________________________________ Grading: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Good), 2 (Fair), 1 (Bad) + specific comments Introduction (_) Background well introduced? (_) Problem & purpose clear? . Analysis/Method (_) Appropriate ref. to SOTA? (_) Problem well exposed/analysed? (_) Approach well motivated? (_) “Implementation” well outlined? . Test & evaluation (_) relevance & design (_) covering the ambition? . Results (_) Results objectively presented? (_) Results comprehensible? (_) Results addressing the problem? __________. Discussion/Conclusion (_) Validity of results considered? (_) Do results allow a conclusion? (_) Conclusion well presented? . Overall Rating (_) General Impression (_,_) “Raw” Average Score . SC Review Forms2

  4. Abstract Review Form (Date of Review: ____ / ____ – 201___ ) Title of Abstract: ____________________________________________________________________Authors: Group _______________________________________________________________ Reviewer(s): Group _______________________________________________________________ Generel comments: _________________________________________________________________ Grading: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Good), 2 (Fair), 1 (Bad) + specific comments Introduction (_) Background well introduced? (_) Problem & purpose clear? . Analysis/Method (_) Appropriate ref. to SOTA? (_) Problem well exposed/analysed? (_) Approach well motivated? (_) “Implementation” well outlined? . Test & evaluation (_) relevance & design (_) covering the ambition? . Results (_) Results objectively presented? (_) Results comprehensible? (_) Results addressing the problem? __________. Discussion/Conclusion (_) Validity of results considered? (_) Do results allow a conclusion? (_) Conclusion well presented? . Overall Rating (_) General Impression (_,_) “Raw” Average Score . SC Review Forms2

More Related