1 / 18

Project specification

Project specification. READ IT CAREFULLY MORE THAN ONCE!. Project initiation. Send to Helena and Lena before 13.00 Friday: Group constellation (5 members in each group: first name, surname, user name)

kalona
Télécharger la présentation

Project specification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project specification • READ IT CAREFULLY MORE THAN ONCE! Helena Lindgren

  2. Project initiation • Send to Helena and Lena before 13.00 Friday: • Group constellation (5 members in each group: first name, surname, user name) • Suggestion of two alternative ”times” Tuesday 27/1 and Thursday 29/1 that suite all in the group for start-up support • Send project plan to Helena and Lena before Wednesday 17.00 • To be approved Helena Lindgren

  3. Project outline • Project plan • Phase 1: Design • Literature study • Activity and user analysis • Design and implementation of prototypes • Phase 2: Evaluation and re-design • Evaluation of other prototypes within same theme • Re-design • Continuous documentation in a report • To be peer-reviewed Helena Lindgren

  4. Assignments are provided by research groups • Theme 1: Promoting health and control over work-related injuries for construction workers • 3 groups working on the project ”Injury-Guide” • domain expert: physician in environmental health • Theme 2: Promoting health, control and autonomy for older people who are not familiar with computer use • 3-4 groups divided between the two sub-projects ”The Nice Guide” and ”Chat-Room” • domain expert: occupational therapist Helena Lindgren

  5. Differences between the themes • Challenges: • Theme 1) designing for mixed types of users and different expert/worker domains; and providing knowledge and support for decision making • Theme 2) special demands when designing for novice users and older persons • For both themes issues concerning design for learning, empowerment and development in organised interaction with others, focussing the activity in the design process and creating innovative solutions for the future are vital. • Different obligatory and suggested literature based on theme • Theme 1) needs to put more effort in searching research literature, Theme 2) has more obligatory literature given but needs to put more effort in finding subjects Helena Lindgren

  6. Project • Tools for analysis: • Main theory: Activity Theory (all constructs shall be used and an assessment protocol) • Complement: HTA Helena Lindgren

  7. Multi disciplinary development of HCI • Sciences • Sociologi, antropologi, psykologi, filosofi, fenomenologi, datavetenskap, kognitionsvetenskap, ... • Theories / models • Verksamhetsteori (Activity theory), Situated Action, Action Science, information processing, Distributed Cognition, ... • Methods • Etnografi, etnometodologi, tillämpad experimentell psykologi (TEP), cognitive modelling, participatory design (PD), konversationsanalys, contextual design, formella metoder, ... • Tools • Activity checklist, scenarios, arbetsmodeller, task analysis (TA), design rationales, cognitive walkthrough, GOMS, ... Helena Lindgren

  8. Example of an Activity theory-based assessment of the activity ”Dementia Investigation” Helena Lindgren

  9. Assessment of use environment Initial process analysis of dementia investigation Main reasoning process Supportive reasoning processes Logistic work process (patient’s perspective) Data Databases Helena Lindgren

  10. Determine the existence of cognitive disease Determine the type of cognitive disease Determine the type of dementia disease Choice of and providing treatment Follow-up on treatment, disease progress Level 3. Main reasoning process for investigating cognitive diseases Investigating cognitive ability Investigating other body functions & structures Investigating behavioural psychological symptoms Investigating social ability Investigating activity hinders Investigating other diseases Level 2. Object-analysing and decisive sub-processes Level 1. Logistic process and object-creating sub-actions SPECT Behave-AD SPECT WAIS MMSE MMSE Blood test Blood test EEG ECG EEG ECG Patient-interview and observation Relative-interview Helena Lindgren

  11. Development of HCI Theory and Practice • Lindgren, H., Nilsson, I.: (2009) Activity Theory as Base for Designing Activity Support System for Health Promotion and Autonomy in Older Persons. (Draft for Interact’09) • For assessment of patients’ situation and capacities a range of validated occupational therapy scales were used in a project focusing older people and computer use: • AMPS, OCAIR-S, MNPS • (ACRS – not validated) • A protocol emerged from the activity theory-based analyses, which was used for assessing development, ability and attitudes towards computer-supported activity Helena Lindgren

  12. Activity theory-based protocol for Evaluation • Table 2. Levels of independence in relation to Internet-mediated activities. • The four main categories of activities identified at baseline are marked in bold face. • To be used by all groups for assessing the level of autonomy of subjects in computer-based activities • To be evaluated and modified accordingly if found to some extent useful (results shall be reported in the project report) Helena Lindgren

  13. Activity theory-based protocol for Evaluation • Can be used as protocol at sessions with users where user activity is observed. For relevant posts in the protocol, a note can be added whether the activity lies in the ZPD for the subject, or if the subject does the activity autonomously to a sufficient degree. • “Sufficient degree” may refer to whether there are time limits or limited interest, motivation, etc. that makes the performance insufficient. • Furthermore, the protocol can serve as base for the creation of key questions in interviews or questionnaires, as well as motivations for re-design or activity schemes for sessions. Helena Lindgren

  14. Helena Lindgren

  15. Helena Lindgren

  16. Literature List: obligatory for all • * Lindgren, H., Nilsson, I.: (2009) Activity Theory as Base for Designing Activity Support System for Health Promotion and Autonomy in Older Persons. (Draft for Interact’09) • * Beaudouin-Lafon, M. 2004. Designing interaction, not interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual interfaces (Gallipoli, Italy, May 25 - 28, 2004). AVI '04. ACM, New York, NY, 15-22. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/989863.989865 • * Beaudouin-Lafon, M.: Instrumental interaction: An interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces. (2000) • And the course book of course! Helena Lindgren

  17. Literature List: obligatory for Theme 1) • * Documents providing the knowledge content of a system. Järvholm, B. Drafts only to be used within this project! • * Singh, G., Hawkins, L., Whymark, G.: (2007) An Integrated Model of Collaborative Knowledge Building. Interdisciplinary Journal of Learning Objects vol 3, pp 85-105. • * Dickinson, A., Gregor, P.: Computer use has no demonstrated impact on the well-being of older adults. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 64 (2006) 744–753 • * Additional articles on subjects related to the project. The project report should include at least 10 peer-reviewed articles! Helena Lindgren

  18. Literature List: obligatory for Theme 2) • Dickinson, A., Smith, M., Arnott, J., Newell, A., & Hill, R. (2007). Approaches to Web Search and navigation for older computer novices. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI 2007, pp.281-290. • A. F. Newell, A. Dickinson, M. J. Smith and P. Gregor : Designing a portal for older users: A case study of an industrial/academic collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions (TOCHI), 13(3) (2006), ACM Portal, pp.347-375.  ISSN: 1073 0516 • A. Dickinson, A. F. Newell, M. J. Smith and R. Hill, : Introducing the internet to the over-60's: developing an email system for older novice computer users. Interacting with Computers, 17 (2005), pp.621-642.  ISSN: 0953 5438 • S. Milne, A. Dickinson, A. Carmichael, D. Sloan, E. Eisma and P. Gregor,: Are guidelines enough? An introduction to designing web sites accessible to older people. IBM Systems Journal, 44(3) (2005), pp.557-571.  ISSN: 0018 8670 • Dickinson, A., Roos, E., Gregor, P., Syme, A., Milne, S.: Strategies for teaching older people to use the World Wide Web. Univ Access Inf Soc (2005) 4: 3–15 • Dickinson, A., Arnott, J., & Prior, S. (2007). Methods for human – computer interaction research with older people. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26, 343-352. • * Additional articles on subjects related to the project. The project report should include at least 10 peer-reviewed articles! Helena Lindgren

More Related