300 likes | 427 Vues
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011. Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department. Agenda. City of Phoenix Water System Overview Legal Requirements & Industry Standards Rate Setting Process Reasons for Last Rate Increase Water Rates Rate Comparisons.
E N D
City Of PhoenixWater RatesJune 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department
Agenda • City of Phoenix Water System Overview • Legal Requirements & Industry Standards • Rate Setting Process • Reasons for Last Rate Increase • Water Rates • Rate Comparisons
Phoenix Water Services Background • Service Area: 540 square miles • System Includes: 6 treatment plants 7,000 miles of water mains 21 active wells 109 water pump stations 53,000 fire hydrants • Fiscal Year 2011-12 Budget: $411 million • Number of positions (2010-11): 803 • Net Assets FY 2010 = 1.2 billion • AAA Bond Rating
Distribution of Water Accounts by Major User Groups FY 2010 Multi-Family 4% Single-Family 88% Non-Residential 8% Accounts 403,000
Distribution of Water Consumption by Major User Groups FY 2010 Multi-Family 15% Single-Family 51% Non-Residential 34% Consumption 119,411,848 ccf 1 ccf equals 748 gallons
Water & Wastewater Annual Budgeted Expenditures Debt Service 25% Pay as you Go Capital 27% Personnel 17% Chemicals, Water & Electricity 15% Materials, Supplies, & Outside Services 16%
Legal and Industry Standards • “Just and Reasonable” per ARS - Cost of Service Based • Federal Equal Protection Regulations - equity • Cost Recovery per Phoenix City Code • Revenue Stability • Cost of Providing Service Using Industry Standards (AWWA M1) • Rates Approved Through The Public Process per ARS
Public Notice Requirementsper ARS title 9, ch 5, art 2, sec 9-511.01 & 9-499.15
Phoenix Annual Rate Development Process Develop 10-Year CIP & (2 year) O&M Budget Develop Revenue Estimates Prepare Financial Plan Determine Rate Increase Necessary to Support Financial Plan City Council Approves 5-Year CIP and Financial Plan City Council Authorizes First Year Rate Increase and Bond Authorizations
FACTORS IMPACTING ADDITIONAL RATE REVENUE • Debt payments for $1 billion in capital improvement projects for bonds issued in the last five years. • $200 million construction expenses required to comply with the Federally mandated Safe Drinking Water Act. • $15 million additional operational costs associated with Safe Drinking Water Act compliance. • Continued maintenance and replacement of an aging infrastructure. • And continued implementation of cost saving programs like the automatic meter reading equipment.
Water Fund Available Cash/Liquidity as Compared to Debt Service (With March 2011 Increase) FISCAL YEAR Available Cash/Liquidity Debt Service Assumes all future increases after March 2011 implemented and no change in expenditures. Financial policy is for available fund balances to equal, at a minimum, total debt service. Higher liquidity is required if debt service coverages are below recommended levels as is the case through 2015.
Water Fund Available Cash/Liquidity as Compared to Debt Service(No Increase in March 2011) FISCAL YEAR Available Cash/Liquidity Debt Service Assumes all future increases after March 2011 implemented and no change in expenditures. Financial policy is for available fund balances to equal, at a minimum, total debt service. Higher liquidity is required if debt service coverages are below recommended levels.
Standard & Poors: Phoenix, Arizona; Water/Sewer assigns AAA Rating and Stable - April 4, 2009 • The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the systems’ strong financial performance will continue as the city implements its large CIP and regular annual rate increases. • The water system has a consistent history of city-approved rate increases, having implemented 19 rate increases in the last 20 years.
Water Base Charge • Covers the cost to read the meter, bill and support the customer and maintain the meter • Charge varies by meter size • Includes 6 ccf of water in winter months and 10 ccf in summer months. (Lifeline) Rates effective April 1, 2011
Water Volume Charge • Raw Water Costs • All Other Costs to Treat and Deliver Water • Rate based on Seasonality of costs Rates effective April 1, 2011
Water Environmental Charge • Environmental Charge Environmental Costs to Treat and Deliver Water • Charged to total consumption Rates effective April 1, 2011
WATER & WASTEWATER RATE COMPARISONSCOMBINED AVERAGE SINGLE-FAMILY MONTHLY BILL20 LARGEST U.S. CITIES $/MONTH $58.46 $56.25 Water Wastewater Based on rates in effect October 1, 2010
WATER & WASTEWATER RATE COMPARISONSCOMBINED AVERAGE SINGLE-FAMILY MONTHLY BILLSOUTHWEST REGION $/MONTH Water Wastewater Based on rates in effect October 1, 2010
WATER & WASTEWATER RATE COMPARISONSCOMBINED AVERAGE SINGLE-FAMILY MONTHLY BILLPHOENIX METRO AREA $/MONTH $105.99 $66.27 $60.88 $58.46 $58.28 $56.48 $56.25 $54.52 $46.39 Water Wastewater Based on rates in effect October 1, 2010
Objectives of Current Rate Structure • Understandable • Simpler to forecast revenues • Flattens peaks in Summer • Includes essential lifeline water demands • Stable monthly water bill for low volume users • Equitable by the fact that each customer pays same rate for water • Provides an incentive for all customers to conserve
Why Seasonal Rates • System capacity is designed to meet peak demands • Peak Demand in Phoenix is in Summer Months • Rate structure focuses on degree of variability in usage between seasons • Provide a price signal to the consumer during the peak period • Encourage efficient use of water system
Costs of Service Allocation Environmental Model Cost of Service Rate Model Environmental • Customer Services • Base Charge Meter Maintenance • Raw Water • Treatment • Volume Charge • Distribution • Base costs to meet average usage • Extra costs to meet max day and max hour usage (Summer) • Environmental Charge
Why No Customer Classes • Rates should allocate peak costs based on a customer’s contribution to that peak water demand • Customer classes are not the only method to fairly allocate peaking costs • City of Phoenix data shows that peaking characteristics do not vary materially among customer classes • Seasonal structure results in fairer and more equitable rates
Rates Compared to Billed ccfs Volume Charge per Month $ Monthly Billable Units CCfs
Water & Wastewater Annual Budgeted Expenditures $761 Million Debt Service 25% Pay as you Go Capital 27% Personnel 17% Chemicals, Water & Electricity 15% Materials, Supplies, & Outside Services 16%