1 / 22

Hermosa Creek A ‘One TU’ Initiative

Hermosa Creek A ‘One TU’ Initiative. Sustaining chapters through leveraging money, partnerships and collaboration. Hermosa: For the next generation of sportsmen and sportswomen. For habitat For a creek For cutthroat For a community For wildlife Forever!.

kamil
Télécharger la présentation

Hermosa Creek A ‘One TU’ Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hermosa CreekA ‘One TU’ Initiative Sustaining chapters through leveraging money, partnerships and collaboration

  2. Hermosa: For the next generation of sportsmen and sportswomen

  3. For habitat For a creek For cutthroat For a community For wildlife Forever!

  4. A Question of Wild and Scenic • 2006 - The San Juan Nat’l Forest Draft Plan • Numerous local rivers found to be ‘preliminarily suitable’ for W/S designation • Hermosa Creek • Upper San Juan • Pine/Vallecito • Piedra • Upper Animas (Alpine Triangle) • Standard public comment sought by USFS

  5. Colorado’s Constitution – trouble? • W/S is the river equivalent to Wilderness for public land – prevents human development (dams) • W/S comes with an automatic Federal Reserve water right – to honor the value being protected with W/S • To abdicate CO water to the ‘Feds’ is something our Constitution, and water developers, can’t support • This is why the Poudre is our only W/S river • OH, NJ and even Puerto Rico have more W/S rivers • Conservation community wants W/S designations • Water development folks do not

  6. What to do? Fight? Lawsuits? • Public comments sure to be conflicting • Thousands of comments likely • Time consuming for the USFS • Years of debates/fights • Costly! • Confrontational • Possible lawsuits costing agency more $ TU to the rescue! A 5 Rivers chapter board member comes up with a plan!

  7. The Rivers Protection Workgroup (RPW) • Chuck Wanner goes to the CWCB, FS and SWWCD • “Let’s work this out as a collaborative, as stakeholders and avoid the fighting, costs and problems” • Water developers, USFS and conservation community agree – “WORK IT OUT” • A steering committee is formed • A process is created – ‘The Hermosa Process’ • Outreach is performed • A workgroup is created • Funding must be obtained!!!

  8. The ‘Process’ • Anyone with an interest is welcome; ‘a stakeholder’ • Open and transparent • Operate on consensus, not votes • Values-based decisions (what value are we trying to protect?) • Protect the value while allowing for water development to occur or continue • Look for alternatives to W/S, if additional protections are needed at all • Colorado River Cutts are the ORV • All “tools” available are an option, including W/S • Developers agree to support one W/S river, if other development opportunities are not hindered • Each ‘suitable’ segment gets its own workgroup; 5 in all • Hermosa is first, the ‘test’

  9. Putting TU’s chapter money to work • Locally raised money employed for local rivers • Seed money for a large collaborative effort • Partnering with others for our rivers & public land • Gov’t agencies (state, fed, county) • Water buffalos • Traditional enviro groups • Other user groups (OHV, mountain bikers, miners etc…) • Rivers being discussed are our “bread and butter” • Give the TU funders something tangible!! • Give your volunteers something to ‘work for, fight for’ • Hermosa has long-been a focus for all of TU’s programs

  10. ‘ONE TU’ • 5 Rivers (Chuck and volunteers) • Steering committee member • Creator of the process • Funding source – 5 Rivers - $7000 over six years • Mely Whiting for CO Water Project • W/S rivers are her specialty, her objective • Our workgroup’s on-call water law advisor • Legislative drafting committee • Myself for Sportsmen’s Conservation Project • public lands program • wilderness/roadless objective

  11. Leveraging chapter $$ • ‘Rivers Protection Workgroup’ needed funding • Facilitation can be horribly expensive • Five separate workgroups over six+ years • Cost $140,000 • 5 Rivers commits first - seed money - $1000 • CWCB • SWWCD • Wilderness Society • San Juan Citizen’s Alliance • Nat’l Forest Foundation • S. Ute Indian Tribe

  12. Hermosa – TU has been committed • SCP’s (then PLI’s) Hermosa Media Tour - 2008 • Home to CPW’s most important and largest native CRCT reintroduction program - (1991-present) • ‘Outstanding Waters’ designation for highest natural water quality (CWQCC) - 2009 • ‘On the Rise’ episode – 2010 • Two, ongoing Embrace-a-Stream restoration projects – 5R • The poster child for CO’s Roadless Rule (largest in CO) • A primary source of diluting clean waters for the Animas’ metal-laden toxic mess • Advocacy for land swap of the only inholding - 2009 • A Durango area recreational treasure

  13. Hermosa RPW comes up with a proposal – Consensus! • A public land proposal – SCP objective • A legislative protection proposal • It takes an act of Congress • Funders LOVE permanence (sustain Nat’l funding) • Locals see their money succeeding (sustain support from local donors/retailers/members for chapter) • Big media opportunities • Social media fodder (Facebook highlights) • CTU, NTU and 5 Rivers blogs • “Keep TU relevant” in the news • Wild/Scenic component coming, SOON!

  14. The Hermosa Creek Watershed Protection Act - 2013 • 1st entire watershed bill, ever! • Basin divided into 3 zones • Special Management Area • Roadless Area • Wilderness • Set-backs for W/S designation • Honors historic uses • Mining claims grandfathered • Main trail stays ‘mechanized’ • Win, win, win!!!

  15. Sportsmen for Hermosa – will Congressman Tipton listen to us? • TU leads a coalition of sportsmen in support • CTU/5 Rivers • SCP • BHA • TRCP • Bull Moose • Nat’l Wildlife Fed • Fly shops • Guides/outfitters • Rod manufacturers • Project Healing Waters

  16. Another example from the Animas basin • Animas River Stakeholder’s Group • 20 year collaborative working on mine restoration and acid mine drainage – water quality • TU a long-time participant • 5 Rivers • E. Russell’s mine restoration program • Sportsmen’s Conservation Project • Alpine Triangle

  17. Partners of the ARSG –TU working alongside agency, industry & miners • CO Water Quality Control Commission • BLM • EPA • Dept. of Reclamation, Mining and Safety • SW Water Conservation District • San Juan County • Sunnyside Gold Corp • Colorado Goldfields • Kinross • Mountain Studies Institute • San Juan Citizen’s Alliance

  18. Chapter money partnered with miners? • How to fund an Innocentive Challenge? • Three TU entities bring seed money • $2000 • 5 Rivers, SCP, Watersheds • Kinross matches $2500 • TU as financial partners with one of the world’s largest mining conglomerates from Canada • Working TOGETHER to resolve the Animas’ water quality problems

  19. Alpine Triangle Ranger (OHV) • Off highway vehicle patrol for one of TU’s most important resources • 5 TU entities help fund • GGA • 5 Rivers • Lake City (defunct) chapter • Sportsmen Ride Right • SCP • Relationship builder w/ counties • Tom Reyburn is a life member of TU and Backcountry Hunters/Anglers

  20. 5 Rivers putting money to work • The 9th Street Project • 2009 • Partnered with: • City of Dgo • Animas Riverkeeper • 5 Rivers seed money • $8000 • CWCB/Riverkeepers - $5000 • Fishing is Fun - $85,000 • City of Durango - $30,000

  21. Share your successes!!!! • Stay relevant in your community!!! • Relationships are massively important! • Provide regular updates to local and regular funders • Make sure members and donors see your efforts, successes and accomplishments • Seek regular media • Gotta Facebook, that’s just the way it is (for now) • Websites are static, not interactive, not visited • Can easily engage others who are not members • Blog, post, get photos up… • “Thank your donors and volunteers”

  22. Questions?

More Related