1 / 19

The Department of Political Science Presents

The Department of Political Science Presents. The Territory of Somewhat Requited Dreams:  Creating an ethnically-sensitive state in Nunavut Dr. Annis May Timpson Director of Canadian Studies University of Edinburgh Science Building Lecture Theatre February 12, 2008 @ 7:30pm.

kamil
Télécharger la présentation

The Department of Political Science Presents

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Department of Political Science Presents The Territory of Somewhat Requited Dreams:  Creating an ethnically-sensitive state in Nunavut Dr. Annis May Timpson Director of Canadian Studies University of Edinburgh Science Building Lecture Theatre February 12, 2008 @ 7:30pm

  2. Interwar politics Socialism in one Country Liberal democracies in the 1920s

  3. USSR • Problem: what do you do next when you have made an unlikely revolution? • Lenin’s solution: the New Economic Policy (NEP) • Stalin & Stalinism

  4. Marx’s theory of revolution • Revolution as the product of class struggle • State is the instrument of the ruling class • Revolution to occur at the highest phases of capitalism • eventual conditions for communism

  5. Lenin’s modification • Revolution in a backward country can serve as a catalyst for revolution elsewhere • Instead, can be brought about by a small conspiratorial organization – a vanguard party • Bolsheviks seize power in October 1917

  6. Problems confronting the new regime • Establishing control • What to do about the war? • How to proceed with the revolution?

  7. Solutions • Sue for peace • Fight civil war • Suspend Constituent Assembly, elected in 1918 • Implement ‘war communism’ – seize food, material needed for war effort • Consolidate power in 1920

  8. The revolutionary project • What to do when revolution elsewhere fails to materialize as expected? • Options: • Continue to promote world revolution? • Try to build socialism in one country?

  9. Lenin’s interim solution: • New Economic Policy (NEP) -- a temporary reversion to capitalism (one step backward, two steps forward) in order to get the economy going again (1921-28) • Ultimate direction: determined by Lenin’s impairment (1922) and death, 1924, and Stalin’s succession to power

  10. Stalin’s succession • Stalin • A lesser figure in Bolshevik hierarchy • However, as general secretary of the Communist Party, well placed • Uses control of the administrative apparatus to advance supporters • 1925: Moves against left (Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev) in defense of NEP • 1927-28: Moves against Bukharin & moderates, promoting ‘Socialism in one country’

  11. Stalin’s policies • Use of party and state apparatus, including terror, • to industrialize USSR • Plan the economy – via five year plans • lay the conditions for socialism and communism • Justification • Bourgeoisie in Russia had failed to industrialize the country and establish the conditions for socialism • Therefore the party and state will do it instead

  12. Leninism v. Stalinism • Democratic centralism (Lenin) presumes that party has a voice • Discussion permitted until a decision made • Then everyone adheres • Under Stalin, party persists, but increasingly attacked • Purges in 1930s used to consolidate power • Centralism rather than democratic centralism

  13. Consequences • Agriculture collectivized, opponents liquidated • Russia industrialized • Decline in individual consumption • USSR substantially isolated from other countries • But until at least the mid-’30s, a beacon for others • From then “The god that failed” – for some

  14. Britain & France in the 1920s • Continual problems: • Containing social forces • Coping with “Red Menace” • Stabilizing their economies • Managing economic downturn

  15. Prevailing economic wisdom: • Stabilize currencies by returning to Gold Standard • In face of economic downturn, • reduce wages & expenditures, allow market to re-adjust • Restrict imports in order to prevent outflow of gold • Little sense of how to manage a national economy to avert recession or depression • Difficult in any case to construct a majority in favour of alternate policies • Socialist parties are either isolated, lack stable majorities to bring about change, or themselves lack solutions which might work

  16. Britain in the 1920s • Problems of boom (1918-20) followed by economic slump • Efforts to deal with social problems watered down -- • Reflect economic problems and lack of a sustained majority for change. • Return to Gold Standard in 1925 compounds economic problems: • Export markets already limited • Insufficient revenue to pay for imports • Manufacturers lower wages • Results in 1926 General Strike – defeated

  17. The Labour Party: • Founded in 1900 • After 1918, a socialist party, committed to public ownership of the means of production • Also a more serious political force, aided by splits among Liberals • But unable to come to power for sustained periods: • Ramsey MacDonald leads minority governments both in 1923-4 and 1929-31, but dependent on Liberal support • Unclear that Labour at this time had solutions other than public ownership

  18. France in the 1920s • Multiparty politics (as before) • Continued weak cabinets: • Alternation between • Bloc National (center-right), determined to make Germany pay • Cartel des Gauche – left coalition – too divided to act • Ongoing financial crisis because of war debt, reparations • Stabilization under Poincaré in late 1920s – helped by economic recovery

  19. Bottom line: • A good deal of economic dislocation, especially in the earlier part of the decade • Some advances in social policy – e.g. public housing, transport, health insurance – but a mixed bag, with reforms often watered down • Few governments or political leaders prepared to cope with the Great Depression… • those tools which were available are not widely understood • Nor in most instances was there a sufficient political basis

More Related