html5-img
1 / 18

Virtuous Spiral or Vicious Circle ?

Virtuous Spiral or Vicious Circle ? Creating and Distributing Innovative Knowledge within Universities. Martin Rehm, Amber Dailey-Hebert, Katerina Bohle Carbonell & Karen D. Könings 20th International EDiNEB Conference, Milton Keynes (UK), June 2013.

kara
Télécharger la présentation

Virtuous Spiral or Vicious Circle ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Virtuous Spiral or Vicious Circle? Creating and Distributing Innovative Knowledge within Universities Martin Rehm, Amber Dailey-Hebert, KaterinaBohleCarbonell& Karen D. Könings 20th International EDiNEB Conference, Milton Keynes (UK), June 2013

  2. universities are challenged to tackle interconnected, ill-defined problems in need of innovative solutions

  3. vs. Top-Down Approach Bottom-Up Approach

  4. Bottom-Up Approach • make use of faculty’s tacit knowledge composed of their on-the-job experiences (e.g. Gherardi & Nicolini, 2000) • transforming individuals’ tacit knowledge into new explicit knowledge  contribute to the process of (innovative) knowledge creation within organizations.

  5. Tacit  Explicit Knowledge & Innovative Knowledge Communities (IKC) Social Interaction

  6. Main Research Question

  7. How do educational innovators collaborate and spread their newly gained knowledge throughout an organization in “bottom-up” initiatives?

  8. Research Model

  9. Setting • Maastricht University • 3-year project: “Learning and Working” • all faculties • new target groups • innovative learning approaches

  10. Instruments • Social Network Analysis • In- & Out-Degree Ties • The amount of connections sent / received • Knowledge Sharing Attitudes • Individuals’ knowledge sharing intentions (IKSI)(Bock, Zmund, Kim, & Lee, 2005)

  11. Social Network Analysis

  12. all ties among members

  13. only “frequent” out-degree connections

  14. Knowledge Sharing Attitudes

  15. Note: Group A; N = 10 (50%); Likert scale 1 (strong disagreement) – 5 (strong agreement)

  16. Conclusion a first preliminary idea of how educational innovators collaborate and spread their newly gained knowledge throughout an organization in “bottom-up” initiatives

  17. Outlook • expand the scope to include a broader group of individuals from within an entire organization  Groups B & C • cross comparison of initiatives • Park University • 2-year project innovate faculty development

More Related