kare
Uploaded by
5 SLIDES
203 VUES
50LIKES

Engaging Students in Scientific Measurement: Methods, Tools, and Organisational Strategies

DESCRIPTION

This masterclass explores the organisational and didactic aims of teaching measurement tasks in scientific research, focusing on stability, methodology, and student engagement. Key discussions include improving measurement task stability, the balance between using automated tools versus hands-on techniques, and how to involve students authentically in the scientific process. By addressing the preferred methods, collaborative learning, and the essence of scientific inquiry, we aim to foster a deeper understanding of measurement concepts while inspiring students to feel like real researchers.

1 / 5

Télécharger la présentation

Engaging Students in Scientific Measurement: Methods, Tools, and Organisational Strategies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MasterclassPremeeting Questions for wrapup and discussion: General Organisatorial Didactic Aims collectedby Michael Kobel

  2. General Questions to discuss Stability of measurementtasks Pro: easierorganisation Contra: exciting to followwhatscientists do (e.g. Higgs discovery in WW, ZZ, gg) Severity of measurementtasks .vs. upcomingboredom Work harder in feweventsorgothroughmanyevents ? Beascloseaspossible to scientists‘ real way of working or just measuring the same quantitiesdifferently (byvisualinspection) Are therepreferredmethods? Countingand buildingratios (like W+/W- and formerly Z at LEP) Histogramming of massesorangles Even programming (e.g. new ALICE)

  3. OrganisatorialAspects Diversity versus Unification wrtmeasurementtasks wrttools for histogramming and combining How to assurethat 120 institutescanjoin in? normallybyfar not all experts, needsomestability International use .vs. localuse Onemeasurementversion for both? Ortwovariants? Onewebsite for both (via „metro plan“) ortwo? How to reallytest the toolsbefore the events?

  4. Didacticaspects to discuss How to assurethatstudents understand whatquestionsscientistsareafter? howscientistssolvethesein practice? How to balancebetween use of automatictools (danger: black box) real, but tedioushands-on working (curvature, zooming, counting…) Leaveroom for discussion, errors and correction of errors Maybeevenroom for own (inquirybased) investigations? Whatshouldbe the take-homescientificconcepts? particle ID, massreconstruction, Signal vsbackground Learning bycomparing (ratios)- collaborativework

  5. Whatareouraims, after all? Makestudentsfeellike a researcher for oneday They do „measurements“ (!), not exercises Theyfeelable to „do itthemselves“ They understand the basicconcepts They understand the meaning of theirmeasurement Whatdidthey find out? Whredoesitplay a role in ourUniverse? They understand the scientificprocess Not try to teach the whole Standard Model in oneday but just fascinatebysharingauthentic fundamental research

More Related