1 / 25

Molecular Modeling of Crystal Structures

Molecular Modeling of Crystal Structures. molecules. surfaces. crystals. 1. Potential energy functions. QM ab initio: distribution of electrons over the system. Gaussian94, Gamess, ... Semi-empirical methods: pre-calculated values or neglect

karinh
Télécharger la présentation

Molecular Modeling of Crystal Structures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Molecular Modelingof Crystal Structures molecules surfaces crystals

  2. 1. Potential energy functions QM ab initio: distribution of electrons over the system. Gaussian94, Gamess, ... Semi-empirical methods: pre-calculated values or neglect of some parts of the ab-initio calculation. MOPAC (mopac6, 7, 93, 2000) Empirical methods: observed/fitted values for interactions between atoms. Sybyl, Cerius2, Gromos, ...

  3. Potential energy functions Differences: * Speed (as a function of system size) * Accuracy * Intended use (heat of fusion; conformational energies; transition states; vibrations/spectra; …) * Transferability / applicability * Availability / user interface

  4. Potential energy functions Focus: Molecular Mechanics (MM) “Ball and Spring” model of molecules, based on simple equations giving U as function of atomic coordinates G = U + pV - TS H = U + pV EMM = U

  5. EMM = Estretch + Ebend + Etorsion + Evdw + Ecoul + ... bonded non-bonded Molecular Mechanicssystem from atoms + bonds H H • stretching • bending • torsion H C C H H H

  6. MM: interactions via bonds r Es = 1/2 ks(r-r0)2 … + C3(r-r0)3 + C4(r-r0)4 bond stretch E - True .. modeled via (r-r0)2 r0 r

  7. C C C C E Force field parameters: bond lengths (Dreiding) Es = 1/2 ks(r-r0)2 Bond type r0 (Å) ks (kcal/mol.A2) C(sp3)--C(sp3) 1.53 700 C(sp3)--C(sp2) 1.43 700 C(sp2)--C(sp2) 1.33 1400 C(sp3)--H 1.09 700 kS=700: E=3 kcal ~ r=0.09Å

  8. MM: interactions via bonds bending Eb = 1/2 kb(-0)2  E  0

  9. E Force field parameters: bond angles (Dreiding) Angle type 0 (°) kb(kcal/mol.rad2) X--C(sp3)--X 109.471 100 X--O(sp3)--X 104.510 100 C O H E=3 kcal ~ =14°

  10. C C Force field parameters: torsion angles (Dreiding) Etor = V1[1 - cos (-01) ] V2[1 - cos 2(-02)] V3[1 - cos 3(-03)] E V3 0 60 120 180

  11. Force field parameters: torsion angles (Dreiding) C C torsion type n V (kcal/mol) 0 (°) X--C(sp3)--C(sp3)--X 3 1.0 180 X--C(sp2)--C(sp2)--X 2 22.5 0 C C

  12. Non-bonded interactions: Van der Waals repulsive: ~r-10 attractive: ~r-6 E=D0[(r0/r)12-2(r0/r)6] (Lennard-Jones) E=D0{exp[a(r0/r)]-b(r0/r)6} (Buckingham; “exp-6”)

  13. Non-bonded interactions: Coulomb (electrostatic) atomic partial charges: Eij=(qixqj)/(rij) atomic/molecular multipoles: E=ixj/Dr3 + - + - + +

  14. additional energy terms in force fields * out-of-plane energy term * Hydrogen bond energy term

  15. MM energy calculation EMM = Estretch + Ebend + Etorsion + Evdw + Ecoul + ... bonded non-bonded bonded non-bonded 1…2 1…3 1…4 1…4: scaled 1…5 1…6/7/8 5 1 2 3 4 8 6 7

  16. Some available force fields FF software focus Gromos Gromos bio Charmm Charmm; Quanta bio Amber Amber bio Tripos Sybyl general Dreiding Cerius general Compass Cerius general CVFF Cerius general Glass2.01 Cerius ionic

  17. Force field parameters:where do they come from? 1. Mimic physical properties of individual elements or atom types, producing a “physical” force field. Properties can be taken from experimental data, or ab-initio calculations. Examples: Dreiding, Compass. + outcome will be ‘reasonable’, predictable; extension to new systems relatively straightforward. - performance not very good.

  18. Force field parameters:where do they come from? 2. Optimize all parameters with respect to a set of test data, producing a “consistent” force field. Test set can be chosen to represent the system under investigation. Examples: CFF, CVFF. + outcome often good for a particular type of systems, or a particular property (e.g. IR spectrum). - extension to new systems can be difficult; no direct link to ‘physical reality’

  19. Force field parameters:where do they come from? 3. Apply common sense and look at what the neighbors do. Examples: Gromos. + does not waste time on FF parameterization; resonable results. - ?

  20. Atomic charges Why? To include the effect of the charge distribution over the system. Some sp2 oxygens are more negative than others. How? Assign a small charge to each atom. Caveat: interaction with other force field parameters (e.g. VdW).

  21. Atomic charges • What is the atomic charge? • * Based on atomic electronegativity, optimized for a given FF. • example: Gasteiger charges. • Based on atomic electronegativity and the resulting electrical field. • example: Charge Equilibrium charges (QEq). • * Based on the electronic distribution calculated by QM. • example: Mulliken charges. • * Based on the electrostatic potential near the molecule, • calculated by a non-empirical method (or determined experimentally). • examples: Chelp, ChelpG, RESP.

  22. Atomic charges Properties and features of different charge schemes: * Depends on molecular conformation? * Easy (=quick) to calculate? * Performance in combination with force field? Known-to-be-good combinations: Tripos -- Gasteiger Dreiding -- ESP Compass -- Compass

  23. Atomic charges:charges fitted to the ElectroStatic Potential (ESP) mechanism: Coulomb interactions result from the electrostatic potential around a molecule. + + + + - - + H - - - H+ - O - - - - H + + + + +

  24. H sample point O H Atomic charges:charges fitted to the ElectroStatic Potential (ESP) molecule QM wave function electron density sample true ESP mathematical fit for each sample point: atomsq/r= ESPQM * atomic q as variables atomic charges that reproduce the true ESP

  25. Atomic charges:charges fitted to the ElectroStatic Potential (ESP) Properties and features of different fittingschemes: * Number of sample points. * Position of sample points. * Additional restraints (e.g. all qH in CH3 equal). * Fitting to multiple conformations. Known-to-be-good fitting schemes: ChelpG RESP

More Related