1 / 18

LHCONE – Linking Tier 1 & Tier 2 Sites Background and Requirements

LHCONE – Linking Tier 1 & Tier 2 Sites Background and Requirements. Richard Hughes-Jones DANTE Delivery of Advanced Network Technology to Europe LHCONE Planning Meeting , RENATER Paris, 5 April 2011. Introduction:.

karl
Télécharger la présentation

LHCONE – Linking Tier 1 & Tier 2 Sites Background and Requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LHCONE – Linking Tier 1 & Tier 2 SitesBackground and Requirements Richard Hughes-Jones DANTE Delivery of Advanced Network Technology to Europe LHCONE Planning Meeting , RENATER Paris, 5 April 2011

  2. Introduction: • Describe some of the changes in the computing model of the LHC experiments. • Demonstrate the importance and usage of the network. • Show the relation between LHCONE and LHCOPN. • Bring together and present the user requirements for future LHC physics analysis. • Provide the information to facilitate the presentations on the Architecture and the Implementation of LHCONE.

  3. A Little History • Requirements paper from K. Bos (Atlas) and I. Fisk (CMS) in autumn 2010. • Experiments had devised new compute and data models for LHC data evaluation basically assuming a high speed network connecting the T2s worldwide. • Ideas & proposals were discussed at a workshop held at CERN in Jan 2011. Gave input from the networking community. • An "LHCONE Architecture" doc finalised in Lyon in Feb 2011. • Here K. Bos proposed to start with a prototype based on the commonly agreed architecture. • K. Bos and I. Fisk produced a "Use Case" note with list of sites for the prototype. • In Rome late Feb 2011 some NRENs & DANTE formed ideas for the "LHCONE prototype planning" doc.

  4. LHC: Changing Data Models (1) • LHC computing model based on MONARC served well > 10 years • ATLAS strictly hierarchal; CMS less so. • The successful operation of the LHC accelerator & start of data analysis, brought a re-evaluation of the computing and data models. • Flatter hierarchy: Any site might in the future pull data from any other site hosting it. LHCOPN LHCOPN ArturBarczyk

  5. LHC: Changing Data Models (2) • Data caching: A bit like web caching.Analysis sites will pull datasets from other sites “on demand”, including from Tier2s in other regions, then make it available for others. • Possible strategic pre-placement of data setsDatasets put close to physicists studying that data / suitable CPU power.Use of continental replicas. • Remote data access: jobs executing locally, using data cached at a remote site in quasi-real time. • Traffic patterns are changing – more direct inter-country data transfers

  6. ATLAS Data TransfersBetween all Tier levels • Average: ~ 2.3 GB/s (daily average) • Peak: ~ 7 GB/s (daily average) • Data available on site within a few hours. • 70 Gbit/s on LHCOPN ATLAS reprocessing Daniele Bonacorsi

  7. Data Flow EU – US ATLAS Tier 2’s • Example above is from US Tier 2 sites • Exponential rise in April and May, after LHC start • Changed data distribution model end of June – caching ESD and DESD • Much slower rise since July, even as luminosity grows rapidly KorsBos

  8. LHC: Evolving Traffic Patterns • One example of data coming from the US • 4 Gbit/s for ~ 1.5 days (11 Jan 11) • Transatlantic link • GÉANT Backbone • NREN Access Link • Not an isolated case • Often made up of many data flows • Users getting good at running gridftp

  9. Data Transfers over RENATER • Peak rates a substantial fraction of 10 Gigabits, often for hours. • Several LHC involved. • Demand variable depending on user work. Francois-Xavier Andreu

  10. Data Transfers over DFN Two different weeks from GÉANT to Aachen • Peak rates saturate one of the10 Gigabit links DFN-GÉANT. • Demand variable depending on user work. Christian Grimm

  11. Data Transfers from GARR - CNAFT0-T1 + T1-T1 + T1-T2 • Peak rates 14-18 Gigabit/s. • Traffic shows diurnal demand & is variable depending on user work. • Sustained growth over last year Marco Marletta

  12. CMS Data TransfersData Placement for Physics Analysis • Once data is onto the WLCG, it must be made accessible to analysis applications. • Largest fraction of analysis computing at LHC is at the Tier2s. • New flexibility reduces latency for end users. T1‐T2 dominates T2‐T2 emerges Daniele Bonacorsi

  13. Data Transfer Performance Site or Network? 1 Gbit Bottleneck at receiver • Test NorthGrid to GÉANT PoP London • UDP throughput from SE 990 Mbit/s. • 75% packet loss. • Data transmitted by SE at 3.8 Gbit/sover 4 1 Gigabit interfaces. • TCP transmits in bursts at 3.8 Gbit/spacket loss & re-tries mean low throughput • Even more data with end-hosts fixed. Classic packet loss from bottleneck

  14. LHCOPN linking Tier 0 to Tier 1’sLHCONE for Tier 1’s and Tier 2’s • LHCONE prototype in Europe. • T1 are connected but not LHCOPN Other regions Other regions LHCONE T2s in a country

  15. Requirements for LHCONE • LHCOPN provides infrastructure to move data T0-T1 and T1-T1. • New infrastructure required to improve transfers T1-T2 & T2-T2: • Analysis is mainly done in Tier 2, so data is required from any T1 or any T2. T2-T2 is very important. • Work done at a Tier 2: Simulations & Physics Analysis (50:50) • Network BW needs of a T2 include: • Re-processing efforts: 400 TByte refresh in a week = 5 Gbit/s • Data bursts from user analysis : 25 Tbyte in a day = 2.5Gbit/s • Feeding a 1000 core farm with LHC events: ~ 1Gbit/s • Note this implies timely delivery of data not just average rates! • Access link “available bandwidth” for Tier 2 sizes: • Large  10 Gbit; Medium  5 Gbit; Small  1 Gbit

  16. Requirements for LHCONE • Sites are free to choose the way they wish to connect. • Flexibility & extensibility required: • T2s change • Analysis usage pattern is more chaotic – Dynamic Networks of interest • World-wide connectivity required for LHC sites. • There is concern about LHC traffic swamping other disciplines. • Monitoring & fault-finding support should be built in. • Cost effective solution required – may influence the Architecture. • No isolation of sites must occur. • No interruption of the data-taking or physics analysis • A prototype is needed.

  17. RequirementsFitting in with LHC 2011 data taking • Machine development & Technical Stops provide pauses in the data taking. • This does not mean there is plenty of time. • LHCONE prototype might grow in phases.

  18. Any Questions ?

More Related