1 / 33

Organic Chemistry textbooks and online homework systems

Organic Chemistry textbooks and online homework systems. Justin Houseknecht (Wittenberg University, Ohio). Overview. Eight best-selling organic textbooks Listed on next slide Focus on organization Corresponding online homework systems Cengage’s OWL – McMurry

kasia
Télécharger la présentation

Organic Chemistry textbooks and online homework systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Organic Chemistry textbooks and online homework systems Justin Houseknecht (Wittenberg University, Ohio)

  2. Overview • Eight best-selling organic textbooks • Listed on next slide • Focus on organization • Corresponding online homework systems • Cengage’s OWL – McMurry • McGraw Hill’s Connect Plus – Carey, Smith • Pearson’s Mastering Chemistry – Bruice, Wade • Wiley’s Wiley Plus – Klein, Solomons • Sapling Learning – any, McMurry • Web Assign – any, McMurry

  3. Which textbook do you currently use? • Bruice, 7thed • Carey, 9thed • Klein, 1sted • Loudon, 5thed • McMurry, 8thed • Smith, 4thed • Solomons, 11th • Wade, 8thed • other

  4. Organizational Overview

  5. Do you currently teach nomenclature • Consolidated – Bruice • Distributed – others

  6. Nomenclature • What are the pros and cons of teaching nomenclature as a single unit instead of the distributed model? • Other textbooks with the consolidated approach?

  7. Which statement describes you? • I currently teach nomenclature consolidated and am no more likely to change now than before. • I currently teach nomenclature consolidated and am now considering a distributed approach. • I currently teach nomenclature distributed and am no more likely to change now than before. • I currently teach nomenclature distributed and am now considering a consolidated approach.

  8. Do you currently teach the first reaction type as: • Alkenes – Bruice, Loudon, McMurry • Substitution - others

  9. First reaction type • What are the pros and cons of teaching alkenes before substitution – elimination reactions? • Other textbooks that present alkene reactions first?

  10. Which statement describes you? • I currently teach alkenes first and am not considering change now more than before. • I currently teach alkenes first and am considering change now more than before. • I currently teach substitution first and am not considering change now more than before. • I currently teach substitution first and am considering change now more than before.

  11. Do you currently teach chirality: • After alkene reactions – Loudon • Before reactions - others

  12. Chirality • What are the pros and cons of teaching chirality after alkene reactions? • Other textbooks that introduce chirality after alkene reactivity?

  13. Which statement describes you? • I currently teach alkenes before chirality and am not more likely to teach chirality first now. • I currently teach alkenes before chirality and am now more likely to teach chirality first. • I currently teach chirality before reactions and am not more likely to teach alkenes first now. • I currently teach chirality before reactions and am now more likely to teach alkenes first.

  14. Do you teach spectroscopy: • After aromatics and before carbonyls – Carey • Before aromatics and carbonyls – others • Lab topic only

  15. Spectroscopy • What are the pros and cons of teaching spectroscopy in lecture? • What are the pros and cons of teaching spectroscopy after aromatics rather than prior to aromatics? • What other textbooks approach this in a unique manner?

  16. Which statement describes you? • I am unlikely to change how I teach spectscopy based on this discussion. • I am now more likely to start teaching spectroscopy after aromatics. • I am now more likely to start teaching spectroscopy before aromatics. • I am now more likely to start teaching spectroscopy in lecture. • I am now more likely to stop teaching spectroscopy in lecture.

  17. Do you currently teach aromatics: • After carbonyls – Bruice • Before carbonyls - others

  18. Aromatics • What are the pros and cons of teaching aromatics after carbonyl chemistry? • What other textbooks introduce aromatics after carbonyl chemistry?

  19. Which statement describes you? • I teach aromatics before carbonyls and am not more likely to teach carbonyls first now. • I teach aromatics before carbonyls and am now more liokely to teach carbonyls first. • I teach carbonyls before aromatics and am not more likely to teach aromatics first now. • I teach carbonyls before aromatics and am now more likely to teach aromatic first.

  20. Do you currently teach carbonyls: • CA’s  Ald/Ket  a-carbonyls - Bruice • Ald/Ket  CA’s  a-carbonyls - others • Ald/Ket  a-carbonyls  CA’s

  21. Carbonyls • What are the pros and cons of teaching carboxylic acids and their derivatives before aldehydes and ketones? • What are the pros and cons of teaching a-carbonyl reactions before carboxylic acids and their derivatives? • What other textbooks have unique approaches to carbonyl chemistry?

  22. Which statement describes you? • I am not considering a change in how I teach carbonyl chemistry based on this conversation. • I am now considering teaching CA’s and their derivatives first. • I am now considering aldehydes and ketones first. • I am now considering teaching a-carbonyl chemistry before CA’s and their derivatives.

  23. Other Unique Features • Green Chemistry • Bruice, Loudon, McMurry, Smith, Wade • Combinatorial Chemistry • Carey and McMurry • Mid-text Introduction of MO Theory • Carey and Smith

  24. Online Homework Systems • Relevance • Examined Aldehydes and Ketones chapters of: • Cengage’s OWL – McMurry • McGraw Hill’s Connect Plus – Carey, Smith • Pearson’s Mastering Chemistry – Bruice, Wade • Wiley’s Wiley Plus – Klein, Solomons • Sapling Learning – any, McMurry • Web Assign – any, McMurry

  25. What online homework system do you currently use? • OWL (Cengage) • Connect Plus (McGraw-Hill) • Mastering Chemistry (Pearson) • Wiley Plus (Wiley) • Sapling Learning • Web Assign • None

  26. Quantitative Results

  27. Quantitative Results (cont)

  28. (Non)Unique Features • Randomized questions • Hints and feedback • Improved student outcomes

  29. Unique Features • OWL (Cengage) • Instruction oriented – Simulations and Tutorials • Very little synthesis practice • Easy to use / few choices • Includes many end-of-chapter questions • WileyPLUS • Opposite OWL – 32 RANDOM synthesis questions • 14 random mechanism questions + linked mechanisms • Includes most book questions, all test bank questions

  30. Unique Features • Connect and LearnSmart (McGraw-Hill) • Connect is mostly book questions, but not all questions from book are included • More multiple choice • Drawing interface was frustrating • LearnSmart useful for student self-assessment • Mastering Chemistry (Pearson) • Primarily book and test bank questions • Apparently no random items, but easy to pool

  31. Unique Features • Sapling Learning • Between OWL and WileyPLUS • Answers not available online (?) • Well-balanced • Web Assign • Rather limited wrt mechanism and synthesis

  32. Conclusions • Most are highly viable options with OWL and WileyPLUS impressing me the most. • I’m happy to show anyone around these systems later today or tomorrow.

  33. Acknowledgments • Kevin Bond, Wittenberg class of 2014 • Zach Gamble, Sapling Learning • Sean Hickey, University of New Orleans, WileyPLUS • Stephanie Kahle, McGraw Hill

More Related