50 likes | 153 Vues
Comprehensive guide on basic field checks for laser tracker systems including system assumptions, setup procedures, compensations, and tolerance levels. Ensure accuracy with these common practices.
E N D
Minimal Basic Field Checks for Laser Tracker SystemsDecision Matrix
Common Recommended PracticesMinimal Basic Laser Tracker Field Checks • Assumption • System has been shipped overseas (airplane) • System has been shipped within a country (truck, airplane, car,…) • System has been moved from one to the other plant (truck, car, …) • System has been moved from one to the other working area (put on measurement cart or transportation in white shipping containers “disassembled”, …) Independent of the transportation way, we recommend a basic minimal test procedure. This recommendation is also applicable for daily work. Unterentfelden 2007-07-18, D.Moser -785
Common Recommended PracticesMinimal Basic Laser Tracker Field Checks Basic System Check 2F-Measurement Setup:2 @ -40°, separated horizontally by 90°(measurements on the floor) Two Face Field Check No Check OK ? Yes IFM-Measurement Setup:use of IFM Distance Tool or2 reflector positions at 3m (10ft) in horizonof tracker head BB-Measurement Setup:1 @ 1m (3ft) Ball Bar Field Check IFM Field Check No Check OK ? Yes No Check OK ? Yes ADM-Measurement Setup:1 @ 3.5m (11ft)1 @ largest working range ADM Instrument Field Check Full Compensation Intermediate Compensation IFM Compensation No Yes Check OK ? ADM Instrument Compensation System in specification Unterentfelden 2007-07-18, D.Moser -785
Common Recommended PracticesTolerances for Laser Tracker Field Checks • MetricBall Bar at < 1m, bandwidth 20 mBall Bar at < 3m, bandwidth 60 mTwo Face, bandwidth 0.0012 deg 0.0013 gonBird Bath Distance (IFM) 10 m *ADM Offset Instrument, residuals 25 m • InchesBall Bar at < 3ft, bandwidth 0.0008 inBall Bar at < 10ft, bandwidth 0.0024 inTwo Face, bandwidth 0.0012 deg 0.0013 gonBird Bath Distance (IFM) 0.0004 in *ADM Offset Instrument, residuals 0.0010 in * Repeatability of two determinations Unterentfelden 2007-07-18, D.Moser -785