1 / 16

Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America

Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Maxwell A. Cameron Political Science 332. The Fujimori Autogolpe. Fujimori elected in a runoff in 1990 Minority president, facing major problems Closes congress, suspends constitution, rules by decree Justification: congressional

Télécharger la présentation

Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America Maxwell A. Cameron Political Science 332

  2. The Fujimori Autogolpe • Fujimori elected in a runoff in 1990 • Minority president, facing major problems • Closes congress, suspends constitution, rules by decree • Justification: congressional obstruction, corruption • Result: re-election under a new constitution in 1995

  3. Presidential Systems Less Stable • A major finding of recent comparative research is that presidential systems are less stable than parliamentary ones. • We do not, however, have an entirely convincing explanation why. • Does presidentialism cause instability, or are presidential systems merely adopted by unstable countries (eg. Latin America)?

  4. Presidentialism Defined • Presidentialism: a political system based on • (a) the separate election of the executive and • (b) the legislature for fixed terms.

  5. Parliamentarism defined • Parliamentarism: A political system in which • (a) the legislative majority chooses the executive and which, in turn, must have the confidence of the legislature; and • (b) terms are not fixed, and the executive can typically dissolve the legislature and call elections.

  6. Problems of Presidentialism I • Presidents rarely have a majority in congress, and hence need to form coalitions to govern. Since members of congress have little incentive to cooperate, executive-legislative tensions can lead to “deadlock.” • Lame duck presidents can result—presidents who serve out their terms without fulfilling their mandates. • Alternatively, weak presidents are occasionally removed before the end of term.

  7. Problems of Presidentialism II • Winner captures entire executive branch and administration. Losers get nothing, can become disloyal • Concentration of power in hands of president. Does not need to share power in cabinet • Zero-sum game

  8. Problems of Presidentialism III • Fixed length of term creates “rigidly demarcated periods” • No constitutional means of removing executive

  9. An additional issue Some presidential systems impose term limits and successful presidents often chafe at these constraints. Result: breakdown of democratic regimes

  10. In Defence of Presidentialism • Coalitions are possible. • Deadlock is relatively rare, not always related to breakdown. • Not all presidents become lame ducks. • Impeachment provides a constitutional mechanism for removing the executive. • Term limits may be a major source of instability, but they are not an intrinsic feature of presidentialism. Term lengths can be reduced. • Separation of powers and checks and balances protect liberty

  11. Alternative Explanations • Perhaps presidentialism is not to blame for instability? • Latin American countries may be more unstable than most, and happen to be presidential. Hence the causal link is spurious (can be explained by some other factor). • Possible alternative explanations: • Multipartism (Downsian logic) • Weakness of parties • Ethnic conflict • Ideology • Rule of law

  12. Rule of Law • Coalitions can be made by illicit means: pork barrel politics or corruption • Legislative opposition can be bypassed through abuse of decree authority • Impeachment can be abused • Lame ducks are often a lightening rod for opposition, which may use unconstitutional means (eg. civil society coups). • Proscription on re-election a key source of conflict, related to need to restrain powers of the presidency (prevent maximatos)

  13. RATES OF POLITICAL STABILITY IN PARLIAMENTARY AND PRESIDENTIAL DEMOCRACIES, DIVIDED BY RULE OF LAW Type of Constitution during Democracy Parliamentary Presidential Number of democracies 54 59 Number of democracies with above average 44 18 levels of political stability Rates of political stability81% 31% Rule of Law High Low High Low (N=40) (N=14) (N=17) (N=42) 38 6 14 4 Political stability95% 43% 82% 10%

  14. Paradoxes of Presidentialism • Despite its problems, presidentialism remains the most popular system in Latin America • Direct election is popular (eg. Brazil, “directas-ya”) • Presidentialism chosen in order to create effective leaders, but it creates weaker (delegative) systems: “The stronger the president, the weaker the presidential system” (Valenzuela) • Example of Allende’s Chile

  15. An Aside: Semi-presidentialism • Semi-presidentialism combines direct election with cabinet government • President elected by voters • Cabinet leader chosen by legislature • Power shared

  16. Does Presidentialism uphold the Separation of Powers better than Parliamentarism? • Parliamentary supremacy - the idea that the abuses of power is prevented by encompassing the executive within the rule-making body • Checks and balances - the notion of ambition pitted against ambition serves to arrest abuses of power

More Related