Enhancing Energy Efficiency: Integrating Measurement & Verification in Existing Building Commissioning
This presentation by David Jump, Ph.D., P.E., focuses on the essential role of Measurement & Verification (M&V) in Existing Building Commissioning (EBCx) projects. It covers the need for M&V to ensure energy savings through verification guidelines, methodologies, and case studies. Key topics include tracking quantifiable benefits such as energy savings, indoor air quality, and thermal comfort. The session outlines data requirements, the M&V process, and case studies that illustrate the tangible benefits of EBCx, with an emphasis on fostering confidence in savings and performance.
Enhancing Energy Efficiency: Integrating Measurement & Verification in Existing Building Commissioning
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Integrating Measurement & Verification in Existing Building Commissioning ProjectsIPMVP Options B and C David Jump, Ph.D., P.E.PrincipalQuantum Energy Services & Technologies, Inc. (QuEST)www.quest-world.com
Presentation Overview • This presentation will discuss: • Need for M&V in EBCx projects • CCC’s Verification of Savings Guideline • M&V Methodology & Approach • Overlap with EBCx projects • Procedure • Case Studies
Benefits of EBCx • Indoor air quality • Thermal comfort • Equipment reliability • Equipment Maintenance • More… • Most quantifiable benefit: Energy Savings
Need for M&V in EBCx • EBCx Energy Savings • Typically ~5% of whole building energy use • Cannot “see” at main meters • Based on data collected before improvements made • Called “ex-ante” savings estimates • No standard calculation methodologies for ex-ante savings
Ex-Ante Savings Calculations Savings = 24,379 – 7,603 = 16,776 kWh annually (?)
Data Requirements • In example: • Trends of fan power and weather required • Sources: • Building automation system • Independent loggers • Local weather stations • Data preparation requirements: • Merge data sets • Prepare analysis ‘bins’ • Analysis • Model systems • Make assumptions • QA on result (“reasonableness”) • Savings calculation effort takes time, focus, & resources away from commissioning the building!
Need for M&V in EBCx • Need confidence that savings are real • Typ. project cost: $20k to $100k • Owners • Need assurance of return on investment • Utility programs • Need to justify expense of ratepayer moneys
“Confidence” • Expressed as “Uncertainty” • Less uncertainty = more confidence • Ex-ante savings: • No way to determine savings uncertainty • e.g 16,776 kWh ??? • Uncertainty may only be determined by: • Calculations using measurements of energy use before and after ECM installed • e.g. 16,776 839 kWh (10%)
Methodology Overview • This methodology is based on: • Continuously monitored building data • Regression-based energy modeling • Applied to: • Whole building • Building subsystems • Written for integration in EBCx projects • Large overlap between M&V and EBCx processes
How to design a good M&V Plan Guideline - Contents • Introduction • General Description of M&V Process • M&V Approach • Required Resources • Analysis Methods • Measurement and Verification Process • Appendices • A: Empirical Models • B: Uncertainty Analysis • C: Example M&V Plan • D: Example Projects
Measurement & Verification - Graphical Concept Adjusted Baseline Measured energy use
M&V - Basic Equation Energy Savings = Baseline Energy – Post-Installation Period Energy ± Adjustments • Adjustments are: • Routine Adjustments • Non-Routine Adjustments
Routine Adjustments • Normal and expected variations in energy use due to operating conditions, normal productions, etc. • Equation becomes: Energy Savings = Adjusted Baseline Energy – Post-Installation Period Energy ± Non-Routine Adjustments
Non-Routine Adjustments • Energy use (or lack of) due to non-routine events, occupancy or equipment changes, etc. • Examples: • Tenant moving in or out of a space • Chiller failure and replacement • Major renovation project • Etc.
Focus of this Guideline • Whole Building (IPMVP Option C) • Short-term interval data from Utility or energy information systems (EIS) • Meters connected to EMCS and trended • Individual building systems (IPMVP Option B) • EMCS trends • Other energy information system data • Temporary or permanently installed meters • 2 different approaches, 1 method
(Guideline p.2) EBCx Process M&V Process Scope of Cx Activity • Identify purpose/goals of Cx activity • Describe roles of involved parties • Identify systems included in Cx process Planning Phase • Establish bldg. requirements • Review available info./ visit site / interview operators • Develop EBCx Plan • Document operation conditions Investigation Phase • Identify current building needs • Facility performance analysis • Diagnostic monitoring • System testing • Create list of findings Implementation Phase • Prioritize recommendations • Install/Implement recommendations • Commission Recommendations • Document improved performance Turnover Phase • Update building documentation • Develop final report • Update Systems Manual • Plan ongoing commissioning • Provide Training Persistence Phase • Monitor and track energy use • Monitor and track non-energy metrics • Trend key system parameters • Document changes • Implement persistence strategies
M&V Approach • Select measurement boundary • Option C - Whole Building • Option B: Retrofit Isolation (HVAC Systems) (Guideline p.9)
Retrofit Isolation • Defining Systems - by ‘Services’ provided • Chilled water system: • Chiller, CHW pumps, etc. • Air handling system: • Supply fan, return fan, exhaust fan • Hot water system: • Boiler, HW pumps (Guideline p.14)
Data Sources Utility websites, e.g. PG&E’s Interact Resource http://www.pge.com/mybusiness/energysavingsrebates/demandresponse/tools/ e,g, PG&E’s Business Tools http://www.pge.com/mybusiness/myaccount/analysis/ • Whole-Building Meters • Electric – 15 minute interval data • Monthly Gas & Electric data • Interval Gas Data (Pulse Counter) • Bolt-on pulse meter • Face plate replacement
Data Sources • Water flow meters • Portable ultrasonic • Insertion-paddlewheel • BTU meters
Data Sources • Weather • PG&E’s Interact website provides cleaned weather data on hourly basis • Other Sources: • www.gard.com/weather/index.htm • www.weatherunderground.com • Take particular note of http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/cfm/weather_data.cfm • which gives sources for weather data in a variety of formats, including real-time data.
Data Sources • For Option B Retrofit Isolation Approach • e.g. HVAC Systems
Data Sources • HVAC Systems • Cooling Tower Fans • Chillers • CDW & CHW Pumps • AHU Fans • Constant load • Variable load • Equipment Power • “Spot” measurements • Power logging instruments • Convert feedback status signals to power/energy • Proxy variables
Proxy Variables (Guideline p.21) • Generates energy variables (kWh, kW, therms, etc.) from: • Feedback status signals trended in EMCS • Constant load / constant speed equipment • on/off status, etc. • Variable load / variable speed equipment • VFD speed, amps, etc. • Independently measured or logged data • kWh, kW • Hot and chilled water flow, etc.
Proxy Variables • Example of constant and variable load feedback signals on EMCS
Proxy Variables • For ON/OFF status points • Make “spot” measurements of kW • Multiple measurements and take average • kW = kWmeasured * STATUS • For variable speed/load signals • Short term logging of equipment kW • Corresponding trended load data from EMCS • Develop relationship between kW and load
Proxy Variables • VFD Speed for kW
Should be in EBCx documentation Required Resources - Data • Gather physical information, within the measurement boundary, for the baseline period: • Energy data (kWh, kW, therms, etc.) • Assure sensors are calibrated • Independent variables: Ambient temperature, occupied hours, etc. • Static Factors: • Equipment inventory, building characteristics • Occupancy, operational schedules • Operating procedures, set points
Amount of Data (Guideline p.34) • Interval Data (Whole Building and Systems): • Issue needs more research (ASHRAE research topic) • General guidance: • Enough to cover a “cycle” of operation (IPMVP requires data through one cycle) • Constant load equipment: spot measurement • Variable load equipment: through range of its operation • Chilled water system: entire cooling season • Building – one year, or half year from coldest to warmest months • Enough to capture 80 or 90% of range of data • Data collected in season when ECMs have most impact
Preparing Data (Guideline p.25) • Different sources • Whole building electric – short term interval data • Local airport or NOAA weather file • Energy information system • Energy management and control system • Different types • COV, analog, digital, “categorical”, etc. • Different time intervals • 5-min (e.g. EMCS trend) • 15 min (utility whole-building kWh) • Hourly (NOAA weather)
Preparing Data • Methods require all data to be on common time interval • Called “analysis time interval” • Guideline recommends: • Hourly • Daily
Useful Data Preparation Software Tools • Universal Translator • Merges and aligns multiple data sets to same time stamp • Interpolates between points, etc. • Much more! • Free from www.utonline.org • Energy Charting and Metrics (ECAM) Tool • Sets up categorical variables for weekdays, weekends, etc. • Much more! • Excel add-in • Free from www.cacx.org
Important! • In almost all cases, after the ECM has been installed, you cannot go back and re-create the baseline. It no longer exists! • It is very important to properly define and document all baseline conditions before the ECM is implemented.
Short Term Interval Methods (Guideline p.29) • Empirical energy use models • E = F (xi) • Statistical regressions • Models are built directly from data • Can determine best model type and fit • Can calculate model uncertainty
Energy use B1 Energy use C C Ambient Temp 1-parameter model 2-parameter model Ambient Temp B1 B1 Energy use Energy use C C B2 B2 Ambient Temp Ambient Temp 3-parameter model (heating) 3-parameter model (cooling) B1 B1 Energy use Energy use Energy use B2 C B2 B2 C C B1 B3 B3 B4 B3 Ambient Temp Ambient Temp Ambient Temp 4-parameter model (heating) 4-parameter model (cooling) 5-parameter model Energy Modeling
Developing Models • General Procedure • Plot data • Select model type (1-P, 2-P, 3-P Cooling, etc.) • Select change point • Perform regressions (averages where needed) • Calculate CV & NMBE • Adjust change point • Perform new regressions • Calculate CV & NMBE, compare with run #1 • Iterate to lowest CV & NMBE • Can develop in spreadsheets using macros
Assess Baseline Model • Develop different energy use models • Select model that best fits data (low NMBE, CV) • Run uncertainty assessment • Determines if model can determine savings within reasonable uncertainty • May need to select alternate approach • Finalize approach • Decide how long to measure in post-installation period (Reporting Period) • Document in M&V Plan
Uncertainty Assessment (Guideline p.61) • Purpose: To determine if model will be able to distinguish savings from the model’s uncertainty • Reference: ASHRAE Guideline 14 Annex B • Appendix B in Verifying Savings in EBCx Guideline • Procedure: • Gather data • Develop model • Estimate expected savings • Calculate fractional savings uncertainty • Compare with savings estimate
Uncertainty Assessment • ASHRAE G14, Annex B, Eqn. B-15 • Uncertainty in Fractional Savings, Esave,m/Esave,m • For “weather models with correlated residuals” • Each point has a relationship with the previous point • Potential when time unit is short (e.g. daily or hourly)
Useful Software • QuEST Change-Point Model Spreadsheets • www.quest-world.com • Excel-based • Energy Explorer • Automatically determines best fit of change-point models to data, makes charts, calculates savings, uncertainty, etc. • Source: Prof. Kelly Kissock, University of Dayton • ASHRAE Inverse Modeling Toolkit (RP1050) • Purchase with Research Project 1050 • DOS-based, source and executable files • Includes test data sets
Spreadsheet Demonstration • Linear and change-point models
Post Installation Model • Similar to baseline model • Developed from post-installation data • Two Uses: • Annualizing Energy Savings • Savings Persistence/Performance Tracking • Example in Case Study
Annualizing Savings • Use when less than one year of data • Baseline or Post-Installation • Use baseline and post-installation models with independent variables • TMY weather data • Other variables • Difference is annual savings
Case Studies • UC Berkeley • Soda Hall • Computer Science Building • 109,000 ft2 • UC Davis • Shields Library • 400,070 ft2 • Undergraduate library
Soda Hall • UC Berkeley’s Computer Science Department (24/7 operation) • 109,000 ft2 • Central Plant (2 - 215 ton chillers & associated equipment) • Steam to hot water heating • 3 Main VAV AHUs, • AHU1 serves building core, • AHUs 3 and 4 serve the perimeter, with hot water reheat
M&V Approach for Soda Hall • Resources: • Whole-building electric and steam meters present • EMS that trends all points at 1 min (COV) intervals • 8-month history of data • RCx measures in AHU and Chilled Water Systems • Electric and steam savings • Very high EUI – unsure if can discern savings at whole building level • M&V Approach: • Option B – applied at systems level (electric only) • Option C – whole building level (electric and steam)
Baseline Model: Soda Hall • Total Building Electric Building Steam • Peak Period Electric HVAC System Electric