1 / 9

TAP Study NYSFAAA Conference 2012

TAP Study NYSFAAA Conference 2012. Patricia Thompson. History of TAP Reports 1972-1999. Higher Education in NYS - Keppel Report 1973 Created the philosophical basis for TAP Temp. State Commission on the Future of Postsecondary Education in NYS – 1977

kaylee
Télécharger la présentation

TAP Study NYSFAAA Conference 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TAP Study NYSFAAA Conference 2012 Patricia Thompson

  2. History of TAP Reports 1972-1999 • Higher Education in NYS - Keppel Report 1973 • Created the philosophical basis for TAP • Temp. State Commission on the Future of Postsecondary Education in NYS – 1977 • Commission of New York State Financial Aid – Volker/Wharton Report 1999-2000

  3. Defining Need Simple and Transparent • NYS Taxable Income • Federal Adjusted Gross • EFC • Poverty Determinations • Assets • Family Size • Deductions

  4. Schedules • Purpose of Schedules – Good and Bad • Reducing Number of Schedules – Short Term/Long Term • Using Schedules to create transparency

  5. SchedulesExamples • Dependent on Parents • Single – no children • Married – no children • Single or married with children

  6. Part-TimeEntitlement Program • Award Calculation • Use of Tap Eligibility • Summer Study • Future of APTS

  7. FinancialIndependence • Simpler – No Grade TAP • Still some issues – can a student who is claimed on TAP return be considered independent? (Small number) • Winners and Losers

  8. Remedial Study • Volker/Wharton “ducked” the issue in 2000. • Large percentage of students need “some” remediation • Students are considered FT for TAP with 3 credits and the equivalent of 9 credits of remediation. • Remediation uses TAP eligibility • Funding

  9. Merit Aid • Volker/Wharton did not address • Scholarships based on future service • “Pure” Merit • Timing of Notification by SED (Volker/Wharton)

More Related