Download
1 / 7
70 likes | 193 Vues
This document delves into the evolution of accountability within the University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (UCEDD) from 1963 to 2009. It emphasizes the partnership model where both the Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD) and UCEDD share responsibilities towards funding sources such as ADD, MCH, and NIH. The transition from a deficit model to a proactive, strengths-based approach highlights the importance of quality enhancement. Recommendations are provided for improving partnerships, program criteria, site visits, technical assistance, and increasing consumer and family involvement.
E N D
About Accountability • It is a partnership- both parties are responsible • ADD invests in UCEDD and in the AUCD network • Both are responsible to be clear • Who we are accountable to: • Funding sources: ADD, MCH, NIH, etc. • University, state, community, consumers and family members
Evolution of Accountability Transition in the field over past 30 years Deficit model to proactive strengths-based model Quality Enhancement as opposed to Quality Assurance Core Functions and Impact Program logic model- clear understanding of what inputs, outputs, outcomes (short term, long term impacts) Understanding of impact of partnerships
Recommendations Partnerships Relevant Program Criteria Return to Site Visits Technical Assistance Reporting- NIRS and annual reports New level of consumer and family involvement Trust
