290 likes | 446 Vues
TABLE OF CONTENTS. ACRONYMS : SLIDE 3ELECTRONIC MONITORING : SLIDES 4 - 18INMATE TRACKING : SLIDES 19 - 29. Acronyms . DCS Department of Correctional ServicesEMElectronic MonitoringGPSGlobal Positioning SystemGSMGlobal System for Mobile CommunicationsATDAwaiting T
E N D
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACRONYMS : SLIDE 3
ELECTRONIC MONITORING : SLIDES 4 - 18
INMATE TRACKING : SLIDES 19 - 29
3. Acronyms DCS Department of Correctional Services
EM Electronic Monitoring
GPS Global Positioning System
GSM Global System for Mobile Communications
ATD Awaiting Trial Detainee
FMD Field Monitoring Device
ICT Information & Communication Technology
CSIR Council for Scientific & Industrial Research
MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework
ATD Awaiting Trial Detainee
PTD Personal Tracking Device
MATD Management of Trial Detainee
A & R Admission & Release
RDOMS Remand Detainee & Offender Management System
SITA State Information Technology Agency
IJS Integrated Justice System
4. Department’s Principled Position Statement
Electronic Monitoring cannot be deployed primarily to alleviate overcrowding but encourage maximum community participation in crime prevention and rehabilitation
Department of Correctional Services believes that deployment of technology remains an enabler for improved service delivery
5. Previous Attempts to Deploy Electronic Monitoring
Department of Correctional Services piloted electronic monitoring after introduction of parole & correctional supervision in 1999 (Pretoria area)
A further Feasibility Study was conducted in 2004
The Results of the Pilot and Feasibility Study
The pilot supported the usefulness of the electronic monitoring, however
Pilot showed incarceration cost R14,75 and electronic monitoring R12,82
The Feasibility Study results showed that areas potentially covered by electronic monitoring could not match the offender population
6. The Results of the Pilot and Feasibility Study
The study “on the available technology at the time showed that electronic monitoring was only effective in 26 % of urban areas and 19% of the rural areas in the country due to reliance on electricity and telephone lines”
The current Department of Correctional Services position is informed by new technological evolution including Global Positioning System and Global System for Mobile Communications
7. Electronic monitoring can be employed to assist in monitoring the following categories of persons;
Probationers
Parolees
Offenders with Fines
Awaiting Trial Detainees (with or without Bail)
Day Parolees
Offenders Delivering Services to communities
Offenders on occasional leave DCS provides for non-custodial measures as alternative to incarceration:
Correctional supervision (Range of diversion options)
Conversions of incarceration into correctional supervision
Placement on parole
Awaiting trial offenders under supervision
DCS legally required to:
Contribute to maintaining & protecting a just, peaceful & safe society by enforcing sentences
Enable offenders to lead a socially responsible & crime-free life
Ensure compliance with conditions to protect community from offences
These requirements raise need to enhance current physical supervision of offenders to:
Improve efficiency of the community corrections system
Facilitate punishment, deterrence, correction & rehabilitation
Promote compliance with conditions such as house detention periods
Limitation of impulsive behaviour by offenders and immediate identification of suspect behaviour
Enhance trust in community corrections within the judiciary and community
Electronic Monitoring (EM) identified as possible tool to assist DCS to supervise offenders remotelyDCS provides for non-custodial measures as alternative to incarceration:
Correctional supervision (Range of diversion options)
Conversions of incarceration into correctional supervision
Placement on parole
Awaiting trial offenders under supervision
DCS legally required to:
Contribute to maintaining & protecting a just, peaceful & safe society by enforcing sentences
Enable offenders to lead a socially responsible & crime-free life
Ensure compliance with conditions to protect community from offences
These requirements raise need to enhance current physical supervision of offenders to:
Improve efficiency of the community corrections system
Facilitate punishment, deterrence, correction & rehabilitation
Promote compliance with conditions such as house detention periods
Limitation of impulsive behaviour by offenders and immediate identification of suspect behaviour
Enhance trust in community corrections within the judiciary and community
Electronic Monitoring (EM) identified as possible tool to assist DCS to supervise offenders remotely
8. Why Will Department of Correctional Services Employ Electronic Monitoring Corresponding statistics
9. SNAPSHOT OF OFFENDER POPULATION/COST
10. Reduce corruption and intimidation of Department of Correctional Services officials
Enhance family stability and community involvement in rehabilitation
Reduce prison population
Afford Department of Correctional Services personnel more time for rehabilitation
Research indicates potential savings
May be a favoured option by the judiciary DCS provides for non-custodial measures as alternative to incarceration:
Correctional supervision (Range of diversion options)
Conversions of incarceration into correctional supervision
Placement on parole
Awaiting trial offenders under supervision
DCS legally required to:
Contribute to maintaining & protecting a just, peaceful & safe society by enforcing sentences
Enable offenders to lead a socially responsible & crime-free life
Ensure compliance with conditions to protect community from offences
These requirements raise need to enhance current physical supervision of offenders to:
Improve efficiency of the community corrections system
Facilitate punishment, deterrence, correction & rehabilitation
Promote compliance with conditions such as house detention periods
Limitation of impulsive behaviour by offenders and immediate identification of suspect behaviour
Enhance trust in community corrections within the judiciary and community
Electronic Monitoring (EM) identified as possible tool to assist DCS to supervise offenders remotelyDCS provides for non-custodial measures as alternative to incarceration:
Correctional supervision (Range of diversion options)
Conversions of incarceration into correctional supervision
Placement on parole
Awaiting trial offenders under supervision
DCS legally required to:
Contribute to maintaining & protecting a just, peaceful & safe society by enforcing sentences
Enable offenders to lead a socially responsible & crime-free life
Ensure compliance with conditions to protect community from offences
These requirements raise need to enhance current physical supervision of offenders to:
Improve efficiency of the community corrections system
Facilitate punishment, deterrence, correction & rehabilitation
Promote compliance with conditions such as house detention periods
Limitation of impulsive behaviour by offenders and immediate identification of suspect behaviour
Enhance trust in community corrections within the judiciary and community
Electronic Monitoring (EM) identified as possible tool to assist DCS to supervise offenders remotely
11. Basic system:
A transmitter within anklet/bracelet attached to offender
Emits signals to a field monitoring device connected to a Communication System/Control Room
Field monitoring device register when offender moves outside of set boundaries / tamper with the equipment
Field monitoring device send alert to central control room for response
Active GPS
System for monitoring an individual’s movement and compliance to time/location parameters 24/7/365 in real time
Programmable to remember zones that are off-limits and areas where the offender is required to be at certain times
Tracks an offender at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters
Tracking unit cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation
As soon as offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available
Information can then be stored
Passive GPS
Also monitoring an offender ‘s movement and compliance with time/location parameters 24/7/365
Continuously records location data throughout the day and is programmable to remember zones that are off limit
At given intervals, the recorded information is downloaded to verify compliance
Passive systems are usually cheaper than active systems and are ideal for applications that do not require immediate notification
Active GPS
System for monitoring an individual’s movement and compliance to time/location parameters 24/7/365 in real time
Programmable to remember zones that are off-limits and areas where the offender is required to be at certain times
Tracks an offender at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters
Tracking unit cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation
As soon as offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available
Information can then be stored
Passive GPS
Also monitoring an offender ‘s movement and compliance with time/location parameters 24/7/365
Continuously records location data throughout the day and is programmable to remember zones that are off limit
At given intervals, the recorded information is downloaded to verify compliance
Passive systems are usually cheaper than active systems and are ideal for applications that do not require immediate notification
12. WHAT IS ELECTRONIC MONITORING AND HOW DOES IT WORK? Active monitoring system
It is a system for monitoring an individual’s movement and compliance to time/location parameters 24/7/365 in real time.
The unit is programmable to remember zones that are off-limits and areas where the offender is required to be at certain times Active
The unit tracks an individual at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters.
The tracking unit then cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation.
As soon as the offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available.
Information can then be stored.
Passive
The unit tracks individuals at specified time intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds)
The unit remembers the offender’s boundaries and stipulations in its memory.
Its on-board processor immediately detects and records when an offender is in violation but does not contact the monitoring centre immediately
The unit can call the monitoring centre once a day or when it is charged to transfer the day ‘s information
Active
The unit tracks an individual at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters.
The tracking unit then cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation.
As soon as the offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available.
Information can then be stored.
Passive
The unit tracks individuals at specified time intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds)
The unit remembers the offender’s boundaries and stipulations in its memory.
Its on-board processor immediately detects and records when an offender is in violation but does not contact the monitoring centre immediately
The unit can call the monitoring centre once a day or when it is charged to transfer the day ‘s information
13. WHAT IS ELECTRONIC MONITORING AND HOW DOES IT WORK? Passive monitoring system
It is also a system for monitoring an offender’s movement and compliance with time/location parameters 24/7/365.
It continuously records location data throughout the day and is programmable to remember zones that are off limit.
At given intervals, the recorded information is downloaded to verify compliance.
Passive systems are usually cheaper than active systems and are ideal for applications that do not require immediate notification.
Active
The unit tracks an individual at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters.
The tracking unit then cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation.
As soon as the offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available.
Information can then be stored.
Passive
The unit tracks individuals at specified time intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds)
The unit remembers the offender’s boundaries and stipulations in its memory.
Its on-board processor immediately detects and records when an offender is in violation but does not contact the monitoring centre immediately
The unit can call the monitoring centre once a day or when it is charged to transfer the day ‘s information
Active
The unit tracks an individual at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters.
The tracking unit then cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation.
As soon as the offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available.
Information can then be stored.
Passive
The unit tracks individuals at specified time intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds)
The unit remembers the offender’s boundaries and stipulations in its memory.
Its on-board processor immediately detects and records when an offender is in violation but does not contact the monitoring centre immediately
The unit can call the monitoring centre once a day or when it is charged to transfer the day ‘s information
14. WHAT IS ELECTRONIC MONITORING AND HOW DOES IT WORK? An ankle bracelet with a radio transmitter as a component that works with a Field Monitoring Device connected to a home telephone line
A transmodal (transfer through skin) alcohol testing device
A mini breathalyzer, measuring the offender‘s breath alcohol content. The unit identifies the offender using voice verification.
Active Global Positioning System that utilizes an ankle bracelet
15. EXAMPLES OF COUNTRIES WITH ELECTRONIC MONITORING Canada
United Kingdom
Australia
New Zealand
Singapore
16. Coverage and reach of ICT infrastructure
Lack of electricity & telephone infrastructure
Currently Department of Correctional Services does not have specific budget for implementation
Offender stigmatisation arising from anklet / bracelet
Public intolerance of people associated with criminal activities
Lack of support systems & residential addresses where offender can be physically supervised
Electronic Monitoring does not stop re-offending Active GPS
System for monitoring an individual’s movement and compliance to time/location parameters 24/7/365 in real time
Programmable to remember zones that are off-limits and areas where the offender is required to be at certain times
Tracks an offender at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters
Tracking unit cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation
As soon as offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available
Information can then be stored
Passive GPS
Also monitoring an offender ‘s movement and compliance with time/location parameters 24/7/365
Continuously records location data throughout the day and is programmable to remember zones that are off limit
At given intervals, the recorded information is downloaded to verify compliance
Passive systems are usually cheaper than active systems and are ideal for applications that do not require immediate notification
Active GPS
System for monitoring an individual’s movement and compliance to time/location parameters 24/7/365 in real time
Programmable to remember zones that are off-limits and areas where the offender is required to be at certain times
Tracks an offender at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters
Tracking unit cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation
As soon as offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available
Information can then be stored
Passive GPS
Also monitoring an offender ‘s movement and compliance with time/location parameters 24/7/365
Continuously records location data throughout the day and is programmable to remember zones that are off limit
At given intervals, the recorded information is downloaded to verify compliance
Passive systems are usually cheaper than active systems and are ideal for applications that do not require immediate notification
17.
Partnership with CSIR
Undertake Best Practice review
Cost Benefit Analysis (equivalent of the Regulation 16 requirements)
Complete the planning processes in time to allow for (inclusion in MTEF) budgeting for 2009/10 Active GPS
System for monitoring an individual’s movement and compliance to time/location parameters 24/7/365 in real time
Programmable to remember zones that are off-limits and areas where the offender is required to be at certain times
Tracks an offender at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters
Tracking unit cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation
As soon as offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available
Information can then be stored
Passive GPS
Also monitoring an offender ‘s movement and compliance with time/location parameters 24/7/365
Continuously records location data throughout the day and is programmable to remember zones that are off limit
At given intervals, the recorded information is downloaded to verify compliance
Passive systems are usually cheaper than active systems and are ideal for applications that do not require immediate notification
Active GPS
System for monitoring an individual’s movement and compliance to time/location parameters 24/7/365 in real time
Programmable to remember zones that are off-limits and areas where the offender is required to be at certain times
Tracks an offender at given time intervals (e.g. every 10s) and has records of the offender’s time/location parameters
Tracking unit cross-checks parameters and realizes when the offender has committed a violation
As soon as offender is in violation, the system communicates with the monitoring centre over a telecommunication network and makes information available
Information can then be stored
Passive GPS
Also monitoring an offender ‘s movement and compliance with time/location parameters 24/7/365
Continuously records location data throughout the day and is programmable to remember zones that are off limit
At given intervals, the recorded information is downloaded to verify compliance
Passive systems are usually cheaper than active systems and are ideal for applications that do not require immediate notification
19. 1. Decrease detention cycle time of Awaiting Trial Detainees.
2. Optimise the management of facilities and population.
3. Assist in security management within the detention facilities.
4. Support the following processes: Admissions, Releases, Roll Calls, Bail and Visitations within the broader IJS.
5. Support detainee scheduling processes.
20. BRIEF BACKGROUND The system’s main purpose is to provide electronic tracking, including the biometric identification and verification of Awaiting Trial Detainees, within a Correctional Center.
The system was identified and sponsored by the Integrated Justice System Cluster
2 pilot sites (Durban Westville Medium A & JHB Medium A ) were identified.
The system has been rolled out to both facilities at an initial value of R28m.
23. FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION INTO MISSING PTDS Findings
The then Area Commissioner was not cooperative with investigations
3236 PTDs unaccounted for (R2,7m)
Some were discovered after investigation
Recommendations
Unaccounted PTDs be written off
No one be held accountable – inmates doings
Disciplinary steps be taken against Area Commissioner
26. CURRENT STATUS Personal Tracking Device Development
A User Requirements Specification has been completed for both the Development of the Prototype and the Integration of the Biometrics Identification and Verification Mechanism into the A&R.
SITA is finalizing requirements for the Magic software and the tender process will ensue before the end of the financial year
27. CURRENT STATUS Identity Verification Roll-out
The sites identified and correspond with the MATD project (and video arraignment) sites
Roll-out awaits completion of integration and upgrade of A&R