1 / 24

AnDY @ IP2 MC

AnDY @ IP2 MC. Simulating DY and Backgrounds Geant3 Model of AnDY Single particle GEANT studies for background suppressions Fast simulation – Estimate of backgrounds Comparison of Simulation with Run11 Data Magnet and tracking. Akio Ogawa BNL 2012 Mar 31. DY. DY : ~7 x 10 -5 mb

keiki
Télécharger la présentation

AnDY @ IP2 MC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AnDY @ IP2 MC Simulating DY and Backgrounds Geant3 Model of AnDY Single particle GEANT studies for background suppressions Fast simulation – Estimate of backgrounds Comparison of Simulation with Run11 Data Magnet and tracking Akio Ogawa BNL 2012 Mar 31

  2. DY DY : ~7 x 10-5 mb @ 500GeV Hadronic : ~30mb 106 Hadron & photon backgrounds Charm & bottom backgrounds Need >100 G hadronic events to simulate backgrounds http://spin.riken.bnl.gov/rsc/write-up/dy_final.pdf

  3. e+e- DY expectations at large xF at √s=500 GeV Note scale of signal for same L Proposed Run13 AnDY configration reasonable efficiency can be obtained for large-xF DY with existing equipment

  4. Lepton daughters from γ* • Most important contributions for γ* at xF>0.1 at √s=500 GeV … • high energy electrons and positrons (E>10 GeV) • require detection at very forward angles • e+(e-) from γ* little affected by “modest” isolation (20mr half-angle cone) • best solution for charge sign would be a dipole magnet (difficult for collider)

  5. Geant Model for Run-11 • BBC and ZDC/ZDC-SMD • HCal is existing 9x12 modules from E864 (NIM406,227) • Small (~120 cells) Ecal • 1 layer Pre-shower detector • Goal: • Establish impact of 3 IR operation on PheniX and STAR luminosity • Calibrate Hcal absolute energy scale with r, f, Ks • Measure hadronic background to bench mark MC further • AN for jet?

  6. Geant Model for Run-13

  7. Single particle GEANT studyPreshower 1 : photon rejection GEANT simulation of a pre-shower detector made of 0.5cm thick plastic scintillation counter. Responses for 30GeV electrons and photons are simulated. A cut of 0.5MeV < dE < 1.5MeV will retain 86% of electrons, while rejecting 98% photons including ones converted to e+e- pairs in beam pipe and preshower detector itself. Retain 86% electrons (and charged hadrons) Reject 98% photons

  8. Single particle GEANT studyPreshower 2 : hadron/photon rejection GEANT simulation of 2nd pre-shower detector made of 0.5cm thick plastic scintillation counter placed after 1cm Pb converter. Responses for 30GeV electrons, charged pion and photons are simulated. A cut of energy deposit in the 2nd pre-shower above 5MeV will retain 98% of electrons, while rejecting 85% of pions and 39% of photons. Retain 98% electrons Reject 85% hadrons Reject 39% photons

  9. Single particle GEANT study ECAL hadron response ½ hadrons leave MIP in ECAL Remaining ½ leave a fraction of evergy in Ecal, thus “mismeasure” hadron energy. With falling energy spectra of hadrons, ~1/100 suppression of hadron just due to response in ECAL GEANT simulation of EMcal response to E>15 GeV π± from PYTHIA 6.222 incident on (3.8cm)2x45cm lead glass calorimeter. GEANT response not so different from 57-GeV pion test beam data from CDF [hep-ex/0608081]

  10. Single particle GEANT studyECAL hadron response : MC Uncertainty GEANT simulation with hadronic interaction package GEISHA (black) and GCALOR(red) of energy deposited in an EMcal built from 3.8 cm × 3.8 cm × 45 cm lead glass bars. Charged pions with E=30 GeV are used in this simulation. The fraction of the incident pion energy deposited in the EMcal is f.

  11. Single particle GEANT studyHcal : hadron rejection GEANT simulation for energy deposit in an EMcal and Hcal for 30GeV electrons and charged pions. A 3x3 cluster sum of deposited energy forms the ratio R=DE(EMcal)/(DE(EMcal)+DE(Hcal)) shown in top plot. With R>0.9 cut, EMcal+Hcal can reject 82% of hadrons while retaining 99% of electrons. The bottom plot shows distribution of f for hadrons that survive R>0.9 cut. Retain 99% electrons (and photons) Reject 82% charged hadrons

  12. Single particle GEANT studyHcal : hadron rejection GEANT simulation for energy deposit in an EMcal and Hcal for 30GeV charged pions. The top plot shows the distribution of f in EMcal 3x3 clusters around the high tower. The bottom plot shows the ratio R=DE(EMcal)/(DE(EMcal)+DE(Hcal)). Blue shaded area is for hadrons surviving cut f>0.7. Red shaded area is hadrons which can be identified using Hcal by R>0.94 cut. This gives 40% hadron rejection for hadrons with f>0.7. Retain 99% electrons (and photons) Reject 40% charged hadrons which left >70% of energy in ECal

  13. ECAL photon rejection Pi0 peaks from Run11 Data Reconstructing pi0 (and eta) reduces Photon background by ~90%

  14. GEANT CPU time/Storage for background simulation • 100G MinBias events for background • Filter for background at Pythia level cannot be very effective (~ 1/10) • ~5sec/event * 10G = 50Gsec = 1.5k CPU years • With 10K CPU = 1 ½ month • Simplified HCAL model in GEANT ~x3 in speed • Smarter Pythia filter ? • Storage: ~10k byte/event * 10G = 100T byte (Filter after geant to reduce storage req)

  15. Fast Simulation based on single particle geant studies • ~1012 p+p interactions in 50 / pb at √s=500 GeV ⇒ full PYTHIA/GEANT not practical • Parameterize GEANT response of EMcal and use parameterized response in fast simulator applied to full PYTHIA events • Estimate rejection factors from GEANT for hadron calorimeter and preshower detector (both critical to h±/e± discrimination) • Explicit treatment in fast simulator to estimate path lengths through key elements (beam pipe and preshower), to simulate photon conversion to e+e- pair • Estimate effects from cluster merging in EMcal (d < εdcell / use ε=1 for estimates) • Estimate/simulate EMcal cluster energy and position resolutions. σE=15%/√E and σx(y)=0.1dcell, used to date for π0→γγ rejection.

  16. QCD Background Estimate from Fast Simulation • Comments: • Conversion photons significantly reduced by π0→γγ veto • Preshower thickness tuned, although perhaps is not so critical given photon veto • Linearly decreasing dN/df estimates smaller hadronic background ⇒ increased sophistication needed for reliable estimates, although other model uncertainties could easily dominate.

  17. Open Bottom Background Estimate from Fast Simulation

  18. Data & Geant ComparisonsHcal as Ecal

  19. Hcal Cell by Cell Calibrationusing pi0 peaks

  20. Data & Fast Simulation comparison

  21. Magnetic Field Used for Charge Sign Simulations • The plan is to reuse the split-dipole magnet at IP2 designed, built and operated by the PHOBOS collaboration. • PHOBOS provided their field map and geometry files for GEANT for simulation studies. • Compared to use at IP10, split-dipole is rotated by 180o around vertical axis, to move aperture restriction from coils close to IP. • the magnetic field calculation by Wuzheng Meng that opens the gap between the poles of the split dipole to 31.4 cm Interaction Point Vertical component of B versus x,z at y=0 from modified PHOBOS split-dipole magnet

  22. Charge sign

  23. Conclusion

  24. Backup

More Related