100 likes | 251 Vues
Early Learning Standards (ELS) serve as benchmarks for children's learning and development, focusing on realistic expectations at varied levels. In India, these standards aim to shift the emphasis from academic outcomes to developmental milestones. Developmentally appropriate goals, set by experts, guide teachers and parents on essential skills for young children. While ELS promote structured assessments and equitable outcomes, challenges include rigid standards and cultural biases. This document explores the phases of ELS, their benefits, and the dilemmas faced in categorizing and applying them in diverse educational settings.
E N D
Definition: Early Learning Standards • “expectations for the learning and development of young children” (NAEYC, National Association for the Education of Young Children) • “set of standards of what children are expected to know and be able to do” (ARNEC, Asia-Pacific Regional Network for Early Childhood)
Rationale • Expectations vary dramatically • experts (developmentally appropriate goals) • teachers/ anganwadi workers (learn to read & write, recognize letters, learn to come to school neat & clean, survive competition, know ‘good’ language, know rhymes) • parents (learn to sit quiet, follow instructions, to learn, to study)
…continued • To reorient ECCE to developmental outcomes rather than academic outcomes • To structure assessment tools & strategies • To use criteria based assessment to develop curriculum differentiate teaching for different age groups • Help to track progress of children and programs • Enables national organisations to collect data, compare, inform and advocate
Development process • Five phases (ARNEC) • Orientation • Writing • Validating • Implementing • Reviewing/ Revisiting
Benefits • Precision – give perspective to curriculum, instruction and practices • Clarity in outcomes – scaffold appropriate and educationally beneficial experiences • Consensus – discussion amongst stakeholders • Equitable outcomes – children from adverse life situations would not be left behind in school readiness
Challenges • Rigid, culturally and educationally narrow standards • Positing responsibility on children rather than on programme • Labeling children, retention of children or taking away educational services • Children from cultural & linguistic disadvantages at higher risk of being labeled • Blaming children for their failure
Dilemmas and questions? • Should ELS be categorized by domains? What are the other better ways to categorize? • Is it helpful to have age distinctions? • Is it helpful to show linear progression when we know that development is not linear?
Dilemmas and questions? • Is a detailed ELS helpful for anganwadi workers who have limited training in early childhood development? • How do we address variation in culture, language, and socio-economic background?