1 / 23

Quark deconfinement in compact stars:

Quark deconfinement in compact stars:. connection with GRB. Irene Parenti. University of Ferrara, Italy INFN of Ferrara, Italy. International symposium: “The QCD-phase diagram”. Skopelos, Hellas 29 May – 2 June 2004. 1 June 2004. Irene Parenti. Summary.

kellerb
Télécharger la présentation

Quark deconfinement in compact stars:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quark deconfinement in compact stars: connection with GRB Irene Parenti University of Ferrara, Italy INFN of Ferrara, Italy International symposium: “The QCD-phase diagram” Skopelos, Hellas 29 May – 2 June 2004 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  2. Summary • Short overview on Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) • Delayed nucleation of Quark Matter • How to generate Gamma-Ray Bursts from deconfinement • Conclusions 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  3. short GRBs few ms – 2 s long GRBs 2 s – few 100 s Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) Spatial distribution:isotropic Distance:cosmological (1-10)∙109 ly Energy range:100 KeV – a few MeV Emitted energy:1051 erg (beamed/jets) Duration:(0,01-300) s J.S. Bloom, D.A. Frail, S.R. Kulkarni, ApJ 594, 2003 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  4. time delay Δt between the Supernova explosion and the Gamma-Ray Burst. GRB and supernovae Connection between GRB and Supernovae Evidence for atomic lines in the spectra of the X-ray afterglow 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  5. GRB990705ΔT ≈ 10 yr Amati et al., Science 290, 2000, 953 GRB011211ΔT ≈ 4 days Watson et al., ApJ 595, 2003, L29 GRB030227ΔT ≈ 3-80 days Reeves etal. , Nature 2002 Time delay from SN to GRB 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  6. 2nd “explosion”: CENTRAL ENGINE OF THE GRB (ass. with the NS) open questions • What is the origin of the 2nd “explosion”? • How to explain the long time delay • between the two events? A two-stages scenario 1st explosion: SUPERNOVA (birth of a NS) 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  7. Pure HSHybrid Star or Quark Star when color superconductivity is taken in to account: A. Drago, A. Lavagno and G. Pagliara Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 057505 Delayed collapse of a HS to a QS Z. Berezhiani, I. Bombaci, A. Drago, F. Frontera and A. Lavagno ApJ. 586 (2003) 1250 Possible central engine for GRB • The conversion process can be delayed due to the effects of the surface tension between the HM phase and the QM phase. • The nucleation time depends drammatically on the central pressure of the HS. • As a critical-size drop of QM is formed the HS is converted to a QS or a HyS. • The conversion process releases: Econv. ≈ 1052 - 1053 erg 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  8. The Quark-Deconfinement Nova model 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  9. quark-flavor must be conserved during the deconfinement transition. Finite-size effects • The formation of a critical-size drop of QM is not immediate. It’s necessary to have an overpressure to form a droplet having a size large enough to overcome the effect of the surface tension. • A virtual droplet moves back and forth in the potential energy well on a time scale: ν0-1~10-23 s « τweak 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  10. Quark deconfinement virtual droplet of deconfined quark matter real droplet of deconfined quark matter real droplet of strange matter hadronic matter in a metastable state stable phase This form of deconfined matter has the same flavor content of the β-stable hadronic system at the same pressure. We call it: Q*-phase. The drop grows with no limitation. when p overcomes the transition point in a time τ Soon afterwards the weak interactions change the quark flavor fraction to lower the energy. 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  11. Equation of State Hadronic phase:Relativistic Mean Field Theory of hadrons interacting via meson exch. [e.g. Glendenning, Moszkowsky, PRL 67(1991)] Quark phase:EOS based on the MIT bag model for hadrons. [Farhi, Jaffe, Phys. Rev. D46(1992)] Mixed phase:Gibbs construction for a multicom- ponent system with two conserved “charges”. [Glendenning, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992)] 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  12. Droplet potential energy: Quantum nucleation theory I.M. Lifshitz and Y. Kagan, Sov. Phys. JETP 35 (1972) 206 K. Iida and K. Sato, Phys. Rev. C58 (1998) 2538 nQ* baryonic number density in the Q*-phase at a fixed pressure P. μQ*,μHchemical potentials at a fixed pressure P. σ surface tension (=10,30 MeV/fm2) 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  13. Nucleation time The nucleation time is the time needed to form a critical droplet of deconfined quark matter. It can be calculated for different values of the stellar central pressure (and then of the stellar mass, as implied by TOV). The nucleation time dramatically depends on the value of the stellar central pressure and then on the value of the stellar mass. 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  14. We fixed the time of nucleation at 1 yr. • The gravitational mass corresponding to this nucleation time is called critical mass: We assume that during the stellar conversion process the total numbers of baryons in the star (and then the baryonic mass) is conserved.[I. Bombaci and B. Datta, ApJ. 530 (2000) L69] The gravitational mass of the final star is taken to be the mass in the stable configu- ration corresponding to that baryonic mass. MHS < McrHS are metastable with a long mean-life time. MHS > McrThis HS are very unlikely tobe observed. The critical mass of metastable HS 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  15. Two families of compact stars 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  16. Energy released The total energy released in the stellar conversion is given by the difference between the gravitational mass of the initial hadronic star (Min=Mcr) and the mass of the final hybrid or strange stellar configuration (Mfin=MQS(Mbcr)): 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  17. How to generate GRBs The energy released is carried out by pairs of neutrinos – antineutrinos. The reaction that generate gamma-ray is: The efficence of this reaction in a strong gravitational field is: [J. D. Salmonson and J. R. Wilson, ApJ 545 (1999) 859] 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  18. Econv ≈ 1052 – 1053 erg GRBs Conclusions • Neutron stars (HS) are metastable to HS ―> QS or to HS ―> HyS • Our model explains the connection and the time delay between SN and GRBs. • possible existence of two different families of compact stars: • pure Hadronic Stars • Hybrid stars or Strange Stars 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  19. Collaborators • Dr.Ignazio Bombaci • Dr.Isaac Vidaña INFN of Pisa University of Pisa Ref: I. Bombaci, I. P., I. Vidaña arXiv:astro-ph/0402404 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  20. Appendix 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  21. Compact stars • HADRONIC STARS (HS) • HYBRID STARS (HyS) • STRANGE STARS (SS or QS) conventional neutron stars hyperon stars 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  22. Probability of tunneling Oscillationfrequency of the virtual drop inside the potential well: Penetrability of the potential barrier: Nucleationtime: Nc=number of nucleation centers in the star core 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

  23. Matter in the droplet Flavor fractions are the same of the β-stable hadronic system at the same pressure: The pressure needed for phase transition is more larger than that without flavor conservation. 1 June 2004 Irene Parenti

More Related