1 / 20

Financial Structure and Moral Hazard

Financial Structure and Moral Hazard. Chapter 8. Nat Springer sprinn@rpi.edu. Sage 3602 (the Annex) Office Hours Monday 12:00-2:00 Thursday 12:00-2:00 By appointment. Overview. In equity contacts (stocks)

kelsie-raymond
Télécharger la présentation

Financial Structure and Moral Hazard

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Financial Structure and Moral Hazard Chapter 8

  2. Nat Springer sprinn@rpi.edu • Sage 3602 (the Annex) • Office Hours • Monday 12:00-2:00 • Thursday 12:00-2:00 • By appointment

  3. Overview • In equity contacts (stocks) • Principal-agent problem • Asymmetric Information • Solutions • In debt markets (bonds) • Moral hazard • Solutions

  4. Eight Great Puzzles • Stocks only 9.2% of external funding • Bonds only 35.5% of external funding • Bank loans 55.3% of external funding • Only large, est. firms have access to securities market • Collateral req’d for most debt contracts • Debt contracts are complicated and lengthy • 5% of investment is direct between saver/investor • Highly regulated financial system

  5. Principal Agent Problem Separation of owners from managers: agent (manager) acts in own interest, not in interest the interest of the of the principal (stockholder) • ‘Play’ with other people’s money • Not pursue profit maximization • Failure to modernize, satisfied with status quo • No incentive to work ‘too hard’ • Spend on unnecessary things • High personal salaries • Embezzlement

  6. I know what you don’t know… • Managers have control over information • Monitor their own activities (accounting, work hours, extra funds for ‘company lunch) • Orchestrated information asymmetry (CEO projects company image, talking points) • Pre-dated stock options • Make risky business decisions • Negative feedback loop • Enron, World.com • Can get away with a lot • Later chapter, U.S. savings and loan crisis 1980’s

  7. Jerome Kerviel and Societe Generale • Go to clip…

  8. Conflicts of Interest • Economies of scope • Underwriting and researching in investment banking • Tweak information to increase underwriting value • Spinning: underpriced IPO’s to CEO’s for future business • Auditing and consulting in accounting firms • Don’t criticize their own systems • Skew results to increase business (Arthur Andersen)

  9. Solutions to Principal/Agent • Monitor and Audit • Government Regulation • Financial Intermediation

  10. Monitor or Audit • Reduce asymmetric information • Principal knows what the agent is doing • Debt contract: periodic payments • Problems • Conflicts of interest • Costly • If private, though, can keep information proprietary • Regulatory disclosure creates free riders, disincentive to audit at all since it’s costly **Why banks, not securities markets, provide most funds

  11. Government Regulation • Federal Exchange Commission • Require Standard Audit practices • Laws against fraud, stealing • Problem: detection difficult, costly (cost-benefit)

  12. Two Examples • Elliot Spitzer vs. Investment Banks • No research/underwriting for investment banks • No spinning • Recommendations must be public (free rider) • Sarbanes-Oxley 2002 • Created public accounting oversight board • Increased SEC budget • No audit/consulting for accounting firms • Independent auditors • CEO must sign-off on financial statements

  13. Financial Intermediation • Mutual/Retirement Funds • Can afford to audit (still free rider) • Diversify risk of bad and good investors • Venture Capital Firms • Put partners on board of directors • No outside sales of stock until after initial period

  14. In Debt Markets/Contracts • Borrowers have wrong incentive • To be risky: only have to pay back fixed amount, so why not ‘go for broke’! • Proposes one investment, proceeds on another • Lose some of the money on bad investment simply increases the need for a more risky investment

  15. Tools to solve MH • Net worth • Restrictive Covenants • Financial Intermediation

  16. Net Worth and Collateral • Net worth: difference between assets and liabilities • Have something to lose • Incentive compatible: reverses MH, now borrower also has something to lose • Problem: People with collateral don’t need loans as much!

  17. Restrictive Covenants • Write restrictions and monitor compliance • Example: loss of collateral if miss monthly payment, default on loan • Restrictive covenants • Specific activities permitted • Encourage activity (link mortgage and life ins.) • Require collateral to be kept in good condition • Require information, audit of borrower

  18. Problems with Covenants • Free riders • Restrictions lessen the attractiveness of loan • Can’t rule out every risk • Always hidden information, intentions • Subprime mortgage crisis

  19. Financial Intermediation • Use banks! • Non-traded private loans • Economies of scale with auditing, paperwork, etc. (even have client pay for it) • 2 benefits • Cuts out free riders (can’t bid on loans) • Keep information proprietary

  20. Agency Theory and Development • Economic analysis of AS and MH • Akerlof and Stiglitz • Asymmetric info, underdeveloped financial mechanisms, and growth • Bad property rights • Red tape • Bad info • Corruption • Hernando de Soto - The Mystery of Capital

More Related