1 / 9

Comments on “Estimating Potential Output for Argentina” Escude, Gabrielli, Lanteri and Roulliet

Comments on “Estimating Potential Output for Argentina” Escude, Gabrielli, Lanteri and Roulliet. Armando Pinell Central Bank of Bolivia September, 2004. General Comments.

keola
Télécharger la présentation

Comments on “Estimating Potential Output for Argentina” Escude, Gabrielli, Lanteri and Roulliet

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comments on“Estimating Potential Output for Argentina”Escude, Gabrielli, Lanteri and Roulliet Armando Pinell Central Bank of Bolivia September, 2004

  2. General Comments • Nearly exclusive accounting methodology to calculate potential output, except for conventional seasonal adjustment and some implicit filter to “smooth” series (to be discussed later) • The main benefit of this approach is transparency (absence of a “black box”) and simplicity to perform historical decomposition and forecast • Nevertheless, an econometric methodology could be desirable in order to verify that factor shares and factor elasticities do not differ • Econometrics also allows us to analyze the convenience of the functional form chosen (Cobb-Douglas)

  3. A Simple Econometric Exercise • A simple regression is informative about the first issue (factor shares vs. elasticities): • This result could be confirmed with more advanced and usual cointegration analysis a la Johansen (1988) and Pesaran and Shin (1999) • Then, the scope of the paper could be extended in this way to obtain stronger and robust results

  4. Statistical Filters and Smooth Series • Use of statistical filters (Hodrick and Prescott or Baxter and King) is avoided in the paper, in order to preclude some results (like a potential GDP growth fall, as will be discussed later) • Then, some issues arise: • What is the relation between 19 quarters geometric average of TFP and those others obtained with usual filters? • NAIRU methodology is not explained explicitly in the paper, and its relation with monetary policy is crucial • This methodological question goes beyond TFP and covers the other two series: Capital and TFP

  5. Comparison with Statistical Filters • Comparisons with other methodologies raise some important questions: • What is the potential GDP growth at “real time” now? • How was it affected by the deep crisis of 2001?

  6. Some Extensions • A prospective analysis could be important, addressing some of these questions: • How Argentina could improve its economic policies (especially monetary and exchange policy) to obtain greater GDP growth in the near future? • What investment rate (as % of GDP) is needed to resume growth and reduce the employment (and social) gap? • Is Argentina competitive in a context of faster technological change? • A future extension with annual series could be the use of “stochastic frontier analysis” to decompose TFP in efficiency and productivity, because the methodology used in the paper assumes the usual efficiency concept implicit in production functions.

  7. The Main Question • How would Argentina set a sustainable growth path, avoiding the fluctuations in the last 30 years of its economic history?

More Related