1 / 15

Facilitating Support of Transformative & Interdisciplinary Research at NSF

Facilitating Support of Transformative & Interdisciplinary Research at NSF. SBE Advisory Committee Cliff Gabriel November 2008. BIO Jim Collins Judith Verbeke BFA Jean Feldman Vernon Ross CISE Suzi Iacono Sankar Basu EHR Joan Ferrini-Mundy Linda Slakey Reid Schwebach ENG

keon
Télécharger la présentation

Facilitating Support of Transformative & Interdisciplinary Research at NSF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Facilitating Support of Transformative & Interdisciplinary Research at NSF SBE Advisory Committee Cliff Gabriel November 2008

  2. BIOJim Collins Judith Verbeke BFA Jean Feldman Vernon Ross CISE Suzi Iacono Sankar Basu EHR Joan Ferrini-Mundy Linda Slakey Reid Schwebach ENG Kesh Narayanan Sohi Rastegar Bill Shultz GEO Sonia Esperanca Richard Behnke MPS Deborah Lockhart Nigel Sharp MPS Deborah Lockhart Nigel Sharp OCI Abani Patra OIA Cliff Gabriel Jim Lightbourne OLPA Marc Rothenberg OPP Neil Swanberg OISE Mark Suskin SBE Rita Teutonico Julia Lane Working Group on Facilitating Transformative & Interdisciplinary Research(FacTIR) http://www.inside.nsf.gov/od/factir/factir.jsp

  3. NSF Approach to PTR • Infuse support of Potentially Transformative Research (PTR) throughout NSF and all its programs • Learn how to facilitate PTR • Lead the community through opportunities for PTR proposal submissions

  4. Transformative ResearchWorking Definition Transformative research involves ideas, discoveries, or tools that radically change our understanding of an important existing scientific or engineering concept or educational practice or leads to the creation of a new paradigm or field of science, engineering, or education. Such research challenges current understanding or provides pathways to new frontiers.

  5. Transformative ResearchWorking Definition (cont’d.) Transformative research results often do not fit within established models or theories and may initially be unexpected or difficult to interpret; their transformative nature and utility might not be recognized until years later.

  6. Transformative ResearchWorking Definition (cont’d.) Characteristics of transformative research are that it: • Challenges conventional wisdom, • Leads to unexpected insights that enable new techniques or methodologies, and/or • Redefines the boundaries of science, engineering, or education.

  7. Potentially Transformative Research (PTR) • Modified Intellectual Merit Review Criterion (done) • Complete GPG documentation for RAPID and EAGER funding mechanisms (done) • Recommend training modules for NSF program officers and division directors (done) • Develop FAQ and tools for communication to the community • Recommend tracking mechanisms for PTR proposals

  8. Current SGER Mechanism • Internal Review only • Limits: $200,000 for up to 2 years • 6 month extensions/$50K supplements • Up to 5% of program funds in a given FY (FY07: $35M or 0.6% of NSF program funds used but this varies by directorate; SBE was 0.4% ($1M)

  9. EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research(EAGER) • Exploratory work in its early stages on untested, but potentially transformative, research ideas or approaches  • Replace part of SGER • “High Risk-High Payoff" • Radically different approaches, new expertise, or novel disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspectives • Budget consistent with project scope and existing programmatic activities (up to $300K for 2 years) Only one of the ways NSF supports PTR

  10. More EAGER • Program Officer approval needed: PI needs to convince appropriateness for EAGER submission Vs “regular” NSF proposals • Require internal review/with optional external input • 5-8 page project description • No cost extensions/supplements -- existing NSF policies

  11. Grants for Rapid Response Research(RAPID) • Rapid release of funds and expedited merit review • Replace part of SGER • having a severe urgency with regard to availability of, or access to data, facilities or specialized equipment, including quick-response research on natural or anthropogenic disasters and similar unanticipated events

  12. More RAPID • Budget consistent with project scope and existing programmatic activities (up to $200K for 1 year) • Require internal review/with optional external input • 2-5 page project description • No cost extensions/supplements -- existing NSF policies

  13. Benefit of EAGER/RAPID Vs SGER • Separates two very different functions within SGER • Provides increased clarity • Provides more flexibility • Explicitly invites PTR proposals as EAGER • Optional external input • Existing NSF policies on extensions/supplements • Increases awareness • To the community • Within NSF

  14. Interdisciplinary Research (IDR) FacTIR’s focus is on “unsolicited” IDR proposals. Recommendations along the following three lines: • reinforcing NSF commitment to IDR; • Making technical adjustments to NSF’s processes/systems; and • identifying internal resources to help POs handle cross-boundary and IDR proposals.

  15. Next Steps for FacTIR • Finalize Recommendations • Brief SMaRT • Finalize Report (December) • Brief NSB (February) • Congressional Report

More Related