1 / 15

Portfolio Committee of Police PFMA outcomes 2010/11 11 October 2011

Portfolio Committee of Police PFMA outcomes 2010/11 11 October 2011. Movements in audit outcomes of completed audits. PFMA audit outcomes 2010-11. Movement in audit outcomes from 2009-10 to 2010-11 Departments and Public Entities. 1. 2.

kermit-norton
Télécharger la présentation

Portfolio Committee of Police PFMA outcomes 2010/11 11 October 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Portfolio Committee of Police PFMA outcomes 2010/11 11 October 2011

  2. Movements in audit outcomes of completed audits

  3. PFMA audit outcomes 2010-11

  4. Movement in audit outcomes from 2009-10 to 2010-11Departments and Public Entities 1 2

  5. Corrections of material misstatements identified by auditors

  6. Predetermined objectives (PDO) findings Departments and public entities Non-Compliance 2010-11: 66% 2009-10: 100% Not useful 2010-11: 33% 2009-10: 33% Not reliable 2010-11: 66% 2009-10: 66% Presentation 2010-11: 33% 2009-10: 0%

  7. SAPS: Predetermined objectives (PDO) findings • Existence of performance information • Consistency of performance information between: • Strategic/annual performance plan, quarterly reports and annual performance report • Presentation in annual report • Reliability of reported performance information STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT ANNUAL REPORT DIVISIONS COMBINE INFORMATION, SUBMIT PROVINCIAL VERIFY, COMBINE, SUBMIT CLUSTER LEVEL VERIFY, COMBINE, SUBMIT Audit and compare reported performance information to relevant source documentation and conduct procedures to ensure validity, accuracy and completeness of reported performance information STATIONS/UNITS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

  8. SAPS: Predetermined objectives (PDO) findings • Supporting documentation at stations/units is not available • Systems for collating information are not updated • Information to be sent through is not accurate • System used does not agree to supporting documentation Reliability of PI Validity Accuracy Completeness

  9. Areas of findings on non-compliance with laws and regulations

  10. Summary of findings on supply chain management

  11. Unfair or uncompetitive procurement Through processes in SAPS (BAC) – disclosed & condoned (total of R70 million). 3 Quotations not obtained Suppliers did not declare interest Approval without all required information Police day – poor planning

  12. Unfair or uncompetitive procurement Resulted in non-compliance findings Inadequate monitoring of contract performance Price quotations not on rotation basis

  13. Findings on HR management focus areasDepartments

  14. Findings on HR management focus areasPublic entities 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

  15. Findings on IT control focus areas * IT audit was not conducted at public entity

More Related