70 likes | 763 Vues
WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION. Continued Application of 5 LPNCs even on TERMINAL PROCEDURESMostly NPAs ( VOR/DME, LORAN, FMS, GPS-OVERLAY, RNAV-GPS )Few DEPARTURE TRIAL PROCEDURESSTATUS : CNFs- NOT ATC- Relevant. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION. INTRODUCTION of NAVDB-SYSTEMsARINC 424- SPECIFICATIONP
                
                E N D
1. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION ICAO STATE LETTER  1978
INTRODUCTION 5 LPNC-CONCEPT
DIFFERENTIATION NAV AIDs vs SIGNIFICANT POINTs
DIFFERENTIATION ENROUTE vs TERMINAL
RULE : 5 LPNC    NOT   TMA 
2. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION Continued Application of 5 LPNCs even on TERMINAL PROCEDURES
Mostly NPAs  ( VOR/DME, LORAN, FMS, GPS-OVERLAY, RNAV-GPS )
Few DEPARTURE  TRIAL PROCEDURES
STATUS : CNFs- NOT ATC- Relevant 
3. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION INTRODUCTION of NAVDB-SYSTEMs
ARINC 424- SPECIFICATION
PROCEDURAL POINTS NOT NAMED
COMPUTER LANGUAGE DEVELOPED        ( D 067Q, CF 062 FF 142 , f. e. )
NOT TRANSPARENT to FLIGHT CREWs or AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 
4. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION DIFFERENCE CNF vs TACTICAL WPT
DIFFERENCE RV    vs TACTICAL WPT
NEED for UNAMBIGIOUS DESIGNATION
5 LPNC =  NO PRACTICAL SOLUTION 
5. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION 
6. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION ALPHANUMERIC IDENTIFICATION of WPTs
BUILDING RULE =   LL NNN
CLEARANCE  vs FLIGHT CREW- ACTION
ALL TMA- WAYPOINTs  NAMED AND CHARTED
CHART vs ND vs CDU  = SAME 
7. WAYPOINT NAMING CONVENTION International Agreement  NOT necessary
NO  Duplicates
SIMILAR to RADAR VECTORING
Hear Back  /  Read Back  IDENTICAL
SIMPLE, EASY to HANDLE , even under HIGH WORKLOAD 
HIGHEST LEVEL of STANDARDIZATION