150 likes | 236 Vues
Practices to Manage Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity. NCHRP Project 20-05 Synthesis Topic 42-12. Paul Carlson June 21, 2011. Synthesis Objective. Document the state-of-the-practice Provide examples of effective strategies Show how other agencies can remain in compliance
E N D
Practices to Manage Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity NCHRP Project 20-05 Synthesis Topic 42-12 Paul Carlson June 21, 2011
Synthesis Objective • Document the state-of-the-practice • Provide examples of effective strategies • Show how other agencies can remain in compliance • Determine needs and areas of future research
Report Status • Draft Final Report complete • Panel meeting June 28, 2011 • Irvine, California • Report published before end of the year
Report Outline • Background • Description of MUTCD Maintenance Methods • Range of Practices • Case Studies • Best Practices • Research in Progress and Research Needs • Conclusions • Appendices – Policies, Practices, Guidelines, Documentation / Reporting
MUTCD: Section 2A.08 Maintaining Minimum Retroreflectivity Standard: Public agencies or officials having jurisdiction shall use an assessment or management method that is designed to maintain sign retroreflectivity at or above the minimum levels in Table 2A-3.
MUTCD Methods • Visual assessment • Measured retroreflectivity • Expected sign life • Blanket replacement • Control signs • Future methods • Combination of methods
Current Compliance Dates • Jan 2012 • Implementation and continued use of an assessment or management method • Jan 2015 • Replacement of noncompliant regulatory, warning, and post-mounted guide signs • Jan 2018 • Replacement of noncompliant street name signs and overhead guide signs
Survey Participants 16 states, 9 cities, 15 counties, and 9 others
Case Studies • St. Louis County, Minnesota • City of Phoenix, Arizona • Missouri Department of Transportation
FHWA-SA-07-020 FHWA-HRT-08-026