1 / 14

SUBJECT ACCESS

This document explores the evolution of the phrase "Subject Access" from pre-1890s to modern-day practices in information organization. It delves into the historical significance of subjects in relation to the classification of knowledge, contrasting earlier associations with more recent document-centric approaches in library cataloging. The impact of technology from the 1960s onward, leading to automatic indexing and the subsequent challenges of subject atomization, is also examined. By discussing various content access attributes and structural relationships, the paper highlights the complexities involved in categorizing knowledge and subjects.

kimball
Télécharger la présentation

SUBJECT ACCESS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SUBJECT ACCESS INF 389F: Organization of Records Information Professor Fran Miksa October 29, 2003

  2. What Does the Phrase “Subject Access” Mean?—Pre-1890s—I • Subject Access associated with Classification of Knowledge (i.e., with a classificatory structure of subjects) • Subjects are the products of human mental discovery • Subjects are socially established and are naturally classified • Kinds of subjects (General—Concrete—Individual)—where “specific” means most concrete • Chief value—subjects considered part of a grand structure of knowledge

  3. What Does the Phrase “Subject Access” Mean?—Pre-1890s—II • Subjects and IEs • IEs “treat” a subject • IEs have “themes” but these themes are of a “treated” subject • Virtually all “Subject Access” up to 1850s is based on the association of subjects as elements of classifications of knowledge

  4. Classification of Knowledge and an IE

  5. What Does the Phrase “Subject Access” Mean?—1890s-1950 • Shift towards equating “subject” with document content • Library cataloging (1890s-present) • Document has a subject like a human being has a personality • Forcefulness of Card Catalog format • Documentation (1890s—1920s—1950s) • A document has many “subjects” • Subject = a “topic” (where topic is a word/term denoting where in a document some idea is mentioned) • Attempts to keep subject structures intact.

  6. Classification of Knowledge and IEs as Sources of Subjects

  7. What Does the Phrase “Subject Access” Mean?—III • 1960s— • The computer revolution • Documentation becomes ISAR • Perceived “bottleneck” & Automatic indexing • Atomization of subjects & the loss of structure • Position of other traditions of practice

  8. The Complications Raised by Other IE Features • Medium of IE • Presentation format & Genre • Audience & Use • Complex subjects/Compound subjects • Physics of music; Sociological aspects of sports; History of Chemistry • Physics in India; Sports in 20th century England • Combinations of subjects & Other features of IEs • Dictionary of the physics of music • Humorous aspects of sports [i.e. an essay] • Children’s book of sports stories

  9. Content Access Attributes • Generator of content • Topicality of content (“Aboutness”? “Of-ness”?) • Form (of presentation) & Genre (“in-ness”) of content • Audience & Use (“for-ness”) of content • Relationships of content with other “contents” • Same content • Augmented content • Transformed content (Essentially the same—Essentially different and therefore a new content)

  10. Content Attribute Issues • Natural language vs. Controlled vocabulary • Automatic extraction vs. Manual assignment • Questions related to Structure • No structure—Minimal structure—Extensive structure • Structural relationships

  11. Structural Relationships • Ordinate structure • Superordinate - Coordinate - Subordinate • Chains; Arrays • Kinds • Equivalence • Hierarchical • Generic • Part • Instance • Associative • Thesaurus relators: BT, NT, RT, Use/Used for

  12. Methods for Identifying and Employing Content Attributes • Automatic extraction (if text is digital) • Read/study an IE • Gather clues • Clues from the IE itself (Title page; Table of contents; Index; Illustrations, etc.) • Clues from outside the IE itself (Container; Reviews; Reference works, etc.) • Convert Findings to Vocabulary of a Given System.

  13. Subject Structures • Value related to purpose • Formats of: • Alphabetical only • Alphabetical with term relationships (Thesauri; Topic maps?) • Systematic • Ontologies of domains • Hierarchical taxonomies • Straight hierarchies • Faceted structures

  14. Classical Library Taxonomies • Dewey Decimal Classification (1876- ) • Universal Decimal Classification (1895- • Library of Congress Classification (1898- ) • Bibliographic Classification (1st version, 1933-1960; BC2, 1960- ) • Colon Classification (1933- ) • BBK (Russian) (1955- )

More Related