Greenhouse Gas Reduction

1. FEMP’s mission is to “work with you to reduce the cost of government by advancing energy efficiency, renewable energy, and water conservation. Together we: • create partnerships, • leverage resources, • transfer technology, and • provide training and support.”

2. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is one of DOE’s multi-program research and development laboratories • located in Richland, Washington • combined GOCO/COCO operation • operated for DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute • ~4200 staff members

3. Executive Order 13123 • Greenhouse Gas Reduction • Greenhouse gas emissions attributed to facility energy use reduced by 30% by 2010 compared to 1990 levels • Energy Efficiency Improvement • Energy consumption per gross square foot reduced by 30% by 2005 and 35% by 2010 relative to 1985 • Industrial and Laboratory Facilities • Energy consumption per square foot, per unit of production, or per other unit as applicable by 20% by 2005 and 25% by 2010 relative to 1990 • Renewable Energy • Strive to expand the use of renewable energy by implementing renewable energy projects and purchasing electricity from renewable energy sources

4. Executive Order 13123 (con’t) • Petroleum • Reduce the use of petroleum by switching to a less greenhouse gas-intensive, nonpetroleum energy source; by eliminating unnecessary fuel use; or by other appropriate methods • Source Energy • Strive to reduce total energy use and associated greenhouse gas and other air emissions, as measured at the source. Undertake cost-effective projects in which source energy decreases, even if site energy use increases • Water Conservation • Reduce water consumption and associated energy use to meet goals set by the Secretary of Energy http://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/about/legislation.cfm

5. FEDS Process Survey Analyze Integrate Implement Verify

6. FEDS Process Survey • Purpose of survey • helps organize and examine available information • prioritize and direct resources for additional data gathering • estimate resource efficiency potential • characterize and prioritize the most promising retrofit opportunities • estimate capital investment requirements and potential energy and cost savings • Information acquisition • don’t go any deeper or broader than needed • focused approach to minimize cost and effort

7. FEDS Process Analyze • Technical analyses • baseline energy analyses • identify alternatives • resource assessment • Comply with 10 CFR 436

8. FEDS Process Integrate • Technology Opportunities • Buildings • Non-building end use • Non-Technology Opportunities • O&M • Processes

9. FEDS Process Implement • Funding • Stakeholders • Developing projects • Creating an implementation plan • Ensure persistency

10. FEDS Process Verify Verification is important, yet its requirements can reduce the cost-effectiveness of selected measures! • Quality • Commissioning • Verification • Evaluation

11. Energy Management Sites Northwest Fisheries Science Center Hanford Forest Products Laboratory Fort Campbell Fort Knox Fort Lewis Griffiss AFB Fort Drum Sierra Army Depot Hanscom AFB NAS Willow Grove Travis AFB Fort Dix Camp Parks Social Security Administration Forrestal Building Presidio of Monterey Fort Irwin Bluegrass AD Vandenberg AFB Fort Bragg Camp Pendleton MOT Sunny Point Naval Hospital San Diego Fort Jackson Fort Gordon NAS North Island Robins AFB Fort Stewart / Hunter AAF 29 Palms Cape Canaveral AFS Fort Carson Fort Huachuca Patrick AFB Fort Polk Fort Riley Fort Hood Fort McPherson / Gillem Anniston AD Fort Sam Houston Fort Benning Redstone Arsenal Schofield Barracks Fort Buchanan Fort Shafter

12. Introduction to FEDS • What is FEDS? • Who developed it? • Why was it developed?

13. FEDS - What is it? • FEDS is a fuel-neutral, technology independent, comprehensive method for quickly and objectively identifying building energy efficiency improvements that offer maximum savings

14. Who Developed FEDS? • The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) developed FEDS with funding from: • U.S. Department of Energy’s Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) • U.S. Army Forces Command (FORSCOM) • U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USA-CERL) • U.S. Army Installation Management Agency, Southeast Region (IMA/SERO) • U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC) • Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA) • Rebuild America (RBA) • World Bank

15. Why was FEDS Developed? • Large military bases needed a tool to help them determine where their energy was going and what energy opportunities existed • Bases had: • hundreds and often thousands of buildings, and usually only one meter • little detailed engineering information on individual buildings • limited understanding of utility information • Key elements missing in existing software programs

16. FEDS Design Goals • FEDS was designed with two major purposes in mind: • estimating current energy consumption for all energy systems under consideration • determining the minimum life-cycle-cost retrofits to systems within a facility and on an installation (considering all interactive effects) and includes estimating: • pre- and post-retrofit consumption • first cost of the retrofits • recurring O&M costs for the retrofits • value of the change in annual energy consumption and annual O&M requirements • net present value of the retrofits

17. How to Obtain the Software • Visit www.pnl.gov/FEDS to submit a request on-line and to view latest software news and update information • Once you’re listed on the official distribution list, you will be notified of all upgrades & updates

18. FEDS Capabilities • What can FEDS do? • What is unique about FEDS?

19. What Can FEDS Do? • Assess and analyze energy efficiency in multiple buildings and at multiple sites • Identify retrofits, determine payback, and enable users to prioritize options • Provide a consistent basis for decision-making on retrofit options 1/03 1/04 1/05

20. Calculate lowest life-cycle and cost-effective energy systems for all building types • Accept generic or very detailed inputs • Determine the optimal set of retrofits to the current system - considering interactive effects = Replace inefficient lights with efficient lights = Less heat into the space, and people begin to feel like penguins Therefore, heating system must make up the difference

21. Provide very detailed efficiency recommendations, including technology selection • Model use areas • Model buildings with seasonal occupancy • Track emissions impacts Warehouse Office

22. FEDS is Unique Peak tracking Life-cycle cost optimization Technology & fuel independence Financial options

23. Peak Tracking • FEDS determines the hourly contribution of each technology in each building to the facility’s peak demand • FEDS allows accurate determination of the value of the energy and demand savings associated with a retrofit

24. Life-Cycle Cost Optimization • FEDS • Selects the minimum life-cycle cost retrofit for a single building or an entire facility • Accounts for energy, demand, O&M, and replacement costs over the study period • Considers the interactions between building systems as well as the interactions between buildings when selecting the optimal retrofits

25. Technology and Fuel Independence • FEDS chooses the retrofit technology that provides the required service at the minimum life-cycle cost • No technology type or fuel is favored over another

26. Financial Options • FEDS allows: • Modification of project cost components • Comparison of various financing mechanisms: • Appropriated or site funding • Utility or third party loans • Leases • Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC)