90 likes | 197 Vues
This document outlines the development and application of the Water Safety Plan (WSP) Assessment Tool in Asia, presented at the Water Safety Conference held in Kuching, Malaysia, from November 2-4, 2010. Key areas include the background of the WSP Project Phase 1 (2006-2008), the process of tool development and testing, insights gained during the conference, recommendations for tool improvement, and future directions for the implementation of WSP guidelines. The focus is on enhancing water safety across regions by refining assessment tools and guidelines.
E N D
Water Safety Conference 2010 Bonifacio B. Magtibay Application of WSP Assessment Tool in Asia
Outline • Background • Process undertaken • Insights and Impressions • Comments/recommendations • Way forward Water Safety Conference November 2-4 2010, Kuching, Malaysia
Background Water Safety Plan Project Phase 1: 2006-2008 ext 2009 • Key Outputs • 1 Pilot WSP • Trained 135 water districts • on WSP devt • Developed 16 draft WSPs • Expressed Need • Guidelines for the review • and approval of WSPs Water Safety Conference November 2-4 2010, Kuching, Malaysia
Process Undertaken TWG workshop on WSP QA Tool (October 2010) Maynilad & Manila Water tested the tool (4th version) with comments (October 2010) TWG review of draft tool (4 versions) with comments (June-Oct 2010) WHO/HQ suggestion to use the draft WSP QA tool (June 2010) TWG Mtg to identify a tool for WSP review & approval (March-June 2010) Water Safety Conference November 2-4 2010, Kuching, Malaysia
Insights and impressions 3 possible uses of the tool -WSP review/approval -WSP monitoring -WSP audit Improving versions of draft tool - 4, 5, 5b, 6.5 Philippine version of WSP QA tool TWG User-friendly and flexible
General Comments/Recommendations Purpose of WSP QA tool will modify some questions WSP Monitoring Team? WSP manual vs WSP QA tool -Number of risks and control measures WSP QA tool to be part of WSP training Process of submission, clearinghouse, consolidation?
Specific Comments/Recommendations • Uncontrolled areas • vs performance • - Stakeholders, catchment • Customer premises • and water quality issues • Unwanted pop-ups • Security warning: Enable • Macros • Guidance window at the start • of clicking each table Graphs -Color coding? -Threshold ? Scoring system -Checklist? -Pass or Fail per section? - High score but with presence of an incident -Any single indicator to determine overall status? Link to CD-ROM for references if no internet access
Way forward • Develop guidelines for: • - reviewing and approving WSPs • - monitoring WSP implementation • - WSP audits • Tailor fit the WSP QA tool as a major component of the 3 guidelines Water Safety Conference November 2-4 2010, Kuching, Malaysia